This is a perfect, real life example of Global Warming Hysteria and the Carbon Tax mania. As I have said so many times before: This is a politicians and bureaucrats heaven since they can TAX ANYTHING in the name of ”offsetting carbon emissions”.
Achieving nothing but economic gloom and doom for the local communities and the common man who have to pay for it. In addition, as a thank you from the politicians for the lower economic standard they give YOU, and which YOU PAY FOR, they give you the Blame and Gilt for things that you cannot control.
Yes, there you have the Global Warming Hysteria in a nutshell!
And I cannot resist giving you one comment to the article:
”The inmates are truly running the asylumn…there is a reason we don’t let bureaucrats or academia types in charge of anything important…they lack basic vision and are beholden to their pet projects that get them grant $$$….
This is truly paralysis by analysis….”
Se also my older posts: Environmental Hysteria by Penn and Teller, Rajendra Pachauri, The head of IPCC endorses and defends India’s aggressive coal plant building!, Carbon quacks and reality denying politicians!, A factory that makes 30 TIMES MORE MONEY by selling ”carbon credits” to fight global warming than it makes by selling it’s products., The scariest organization you ever seen – Take your children and run before they tax you to death!, Billions wasted on UN climate carbon offsetting programme, GREEN CORRUPTION: UNITED NATIONS CARBON CREDIT SCHEME ACCUSED OF FRAUD, Russia will not sell it’s emission rights, Why the carbon trading scheme is impossible and unjust, Green tax revolt: Britons ‘will not foot bill to save planet’, A Big Nyet: Russia Doesn’t Want any Binding Caps on Carbon!, Global warming proposals would gut N.C. economy, An Organization Diagram from Hell – Welcome to carbon trading!, Carbon plan ‘to cost business $22bn’, ”Emissions Trading – a Weapon of Mass Taxation”, Giant Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your Way, Don’t bother with emissions trading law, the Chambers of Commerce tells MPs, Europe finds that cutting carbon emissions is far easier said than done. Geschäftet och fusket med handeln av utsläppsrätter!, A Carbon fantasy that will bankrupt us!, EU:s CO2 policy – The hot air of hypocrisy!, Self-Interest: Inconvenient Truth of Climate Change!, The Price Tag – Kostnaderna för Global Warming för VANLIGT FOLK -2!, The Price Tag – Kostnaderna för Global Warming för VANLIGT FOLK!, $ 2,9 Biljoner i sänkt BNP för en sänkning av CO2 på 25 ppm!, De ekonomiska realiteterna av Global Warming Hysterin,
And these posts:
Democratic Senators rebelled against their leadership and opposed the Boxer Climate Tax Bill, America’s native criminal class – The Congress, The USA policy towards Kyoto, Global Warming Hysterics view rising fuel costs as ‘the best thing that can possibly happen.’, They Will Tax You to Death by cap and trade, But They Can’t Even Run a Restaurant! Cap and Burn – Bye Bye Lieberman-Warner, The scariest organization you ever seen – Take your children and run before they tax you to death!, This carbon bill isn’t the answer, Cap and Spend – The largest income redistribution scheme since the income tax!, An Organization Diagram from Hell – Welcome to carbon trading!, We Don’t Need a Climate Tax on the Poor, Climate Reality Bites with Cap and trade – This is a giant revenue grab, Sacrifices to the Climate Gods Beware Lieberman-Warner, Just Call It ’Cap-and-Tax’, The Economic Costs of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Change Legislation, Democrats Fall Out, McWavering: What’s the Deal-Breaker for Lieberman-Warner?, Obamas Big Carbon Footprint, How Hawaii Will Be Affected by the Lieberman-Warner Global Climate Change Legislation, Climate Catastrophe for The state of Washington, Global warming proposals would gut N.C. economy, An Open Letter to the Presidential Candidates on Global Warming, Carbon plan ‘to cost business $22bn’,
The Article is here:
”Sustainability” runs amok in my town of Chico
About two years ago I was asked by my local city councilman Larry Wahl to serve on the city of Chico ”sustainability task force”. I was initially enthusiastic, but the talk soon turned away from alternative energy solutions that I embrace, to getting a city wide inventory of carbon emissions. The task force, chaired by Vice Mayor Ann Schwab didn’t seem the least bit interested in solutions, but focused on tallying carbon emissions in town. That effort didn’t make a lot of sense to me then, since it gained the city nothing.
Now I know why, it was a prelude to taxation followed by wanton spending. They had to inventory to know how to tax. The ”greenhouse gas” report they issued on September 2nd of this year had a number of oddball fees, taxes, giveaways, and edicts, such as a city wide gasoline tax, and even free electricity handouts to city employees for sustainable commuting. All of this while we are in an economic downturn and city financial crisis. This is why I can no longer support Ann Schwab, even though I worked with her.
There is a backstory to my involvement with this, but first things first, here is a copy of the sustainability task force ”work plan” from September 2nd.
The local newspaper also did a story on the preliminary report, but not on the work plan from the link above.
Most important to note is that while my name is on this report, I had no hand in it whatsoever, as I was unceremoniously booted off the task force on December 20th, 2007 by vice mayor Schwab who sent me a letter advising of my termination. The reason? Attendance. But this goes to show how messed up things are with this task force, as they could not even get my termination straight and had me listed as a member 9 months afterwards.
For the record, there is little in this report I agree with and my name should not be on it. Two weeks ago I sent an email to Vice Mayor Schwab and the City Clerk Debbie Presson asking that my name be removed. No response.
When I was on the task force I had the distinction of being one of the few people that actually walked the talk, as I had put solar on my home and a local school, plus I drive an electric car (though I’ve since upgraded to a newer model electric).
No matter, I wasn’t well liked because I really didn’t want to play the carbon emissions tally game, preferring solutions instead. So I’m not surprised that Schwab booted me off when she had the chance.
The task force was made up of a few people like myself, that ran businesses in town, but the vast majority were city employees, university employees, and other publicly paid people. The meetings were on Mondays in the middle of the afternoon. People like me that run businesses found it hard to attend, because with us lost time at work means lost revenue, City and university employees don’t have those problems. Prior to my dismissal, another local businessman, Lon Glazner, voluntarily left because he had the same issues.
OK, enough about why my name is on the report, and why it tends to be public employee centric rather than more representative of our community makeup.
First there is the cost: $30,000 which went to a university employee (already on the public payroll) to produce this report. Another consultant fee in the same cozy city-university sustainability circle of friends. They did no outside bid advertisements that I’m aware of, they just picked the university ”sustainability guru” to do the job.
Let’s look at some of the suggested ”community reduction” actions in this report presented by Schwab and her task force:
A suggestion to pay city employees to give up their parking spot.
Require energy audits on residential units at the time of sale.
Increased fees on waste disposal.
A local gasoline tax to generate local revenue.
Forcing a lights out policy on local businesses after hours
Free electricity and free parking for city employees that drive electric vehicles
Free or reduced cost electricity and parking for citizens that drive electric vehicles
You can find these items in Appendix C of the report, near the end under ”Community Reduction Measures” which are designed to meet a carbon emissions target.
Here’s an interesting graph from the consultant’s report:
I don’t know about you, but spending 30 grand for information telling us that cars are the biggest source of CO2 in or city of Chico?. Shocker. No worries, we’ll attack that problem. On page 39 of the September 2 Greenhouse Gas Report there is this gem: ”By implementing a local gas tax, the City could generate revenue to put toward sustainability projects”.
Yep, tax and spend. Darn those evil cars driven by irresponsible citizens.
The task force also favors doling out taxpayer money for ”sustainability”, page 42: ”For employees who own electric vehicles, the City could provide prime parking locations that offer free electric filling stations.” and for the public, page 39: ”Electric fueling station-provide free or low-cost electric fueling stations for EVs.”
I drive an electric car. I’d gladly pay $1-3 per hour for park n’ charge. Vice mayor Schwab not only misses this dirt simple revenue opportunity, she wants to give away free electricity during a city budget crisis.
Just yesterday the state of California announced it was already 10 billion in the hole this year, and our county government announced it was 10 million in the red. Chico‘s own sales tax revenue has been falling, and the city budget has been in the red for at least two years now, and there has been little substantial movement by city leaders to really solve the problem.
From my friend Lon Glazner’s Commission Impossible blog Commission Impossible Blog, here is a recent memo to all city councilors about the current tax revenue situation:
This isn’t news, as city sales tax revenue has been sliding for quite awhile now and the City of Chico’s budget has been in the hole and will likely continue to be:
Image: The city General Fund and Parks deficit in red without transfers away from road and transportation improvements. Money from a gas tax we all pay has been transferred away from roads to cover the costs of other spending. If you wonder why bike routes are planned but not built, or why roads and traffic issues take so long to address, here is the culprit.
For those reading that don’t live here, the business climate of our town is getting grim. Departments stores, restaurants, and other local businesses are closing almost daily due to the economic climate. The trickle down effect from state budget cuts will also affect the city’s largest state funded employers soon, such as Chico State University, and the Chico Unified School District.
So with the city budget headed for a certain train wreck, and the state economy in a shambles, I am absolutely gobsmacked that Schwab and her sustainability task force are suggesting gasoline taxes and free electricity giveaways at the same time. Then there’s the idea that businesses should be forced to turn out their lights at night. Saving energy is a fine idea, but at the expense of inviting crime into an unlit business?
This shows a level of disconnect that only a bureaucrat could muster. And, it’s why I strongly recommend that people reading this don’t vote for Schwab, but choose a city council candidate that has some business sense.
I’m all for efficiency and alternate energy ideas that are cost neutral or revenue generators, but the reality is those things aren’t being considered.
Public giveaways, new taxes, and visions of a sustainable future won’t solve the budget problems, sensible management combined with spending cuts and plans that will enhance the local business environment will.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>