The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data

Här kommer e mycket intressant jämförelse mellan GISS  och UAH monthly average anomaly temperature data.

Och SURPRISE! SURPRISE! GISS (NASA och Mr Gloom and Doom Hansen) LIGGER KONSTANT ÖVER TILL MYCKET ÖVER UAH DATAT.

This 1980-2008 discrepancy between GISS and UAH is important, as it is nearly equal to the claimed warming trend since 1980.”

”As you can see below, the discrepancy has increased over time.”

”The fact that GISS shows 2008 temperatures much higher than 1980, and UAH shows 2008 temperatures lower than 1980, is also a clear indicator that the two data sets are divergent.”

Det är på sådan här lösan grund och ovetenskapliga metoder som hela Global Warming Hysterin bygger. Läs och begrunda – det är på sådana här ”fakta” som som våra intälägänta politiker vill offra vanligt folks välfärd och våra länders ekonomi.

Se även mina inlägg: Minus 60 C or not?,  More on the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data and the mess they haveThe world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data,  Annual North American temperature is FALLING at a rate of 0.78C/decadeThe fight to get the temperature data that Global Warming Hysterics don’t want you to seeTemperature data – What it really means. GLOBAL TEMPERATURE TRENDS FROM 2500 B.C. TO 2008 A.D,  Documenting the global warming fraud – ”Getting Rid” of the Medieval Warming Period20, 000 year of Temperature, CO2 and sea level change dataAn Eighteen-Hundred-Year Climate Record from China

Och

How we know that they, the Global Warming Hysterics, know they are lyingThe editor of the International Journal of Climatology has finally said that they do not require authors to provide supporting dataRewriting Temperature History – Time and Time Again!NOAA Cherry Picking on Trend Analyses50 Years of CO2 monitoring: Can you see the increase???422 700 år av temperaturdata från Antarktis,   Temperaturen för 130 000 år sedan,

Article här: 

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/uah/from:1980

Divergence Between GISS and UAH since 1980

17-01-2009

 Guest post by Steven Goddard

The GISS website shows the graph (below, which indicates a steady, steep warming trend over the last 30 years.  The monthly average anomaly for 2008 (0.44) is 0.26 degrees warmer than the monthly average anomaly for 1980 (0.18.)  Data obtained from here: http://www.woodfortrees.org/data/gistemp/from:1980/plot/uah/from:1980

2009-01-17_192153

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2008/Fig1.gif

 By contrast, the UAH monthly average anomaly for 2008 (0.05) is 0.04 degrees cooler than the UAH monthly average anomaly for 1980 (0.09.)  Again, data obtained from here: http://www.woodfortrees.org/data/uah/from:1980

2009-01-17_192244

This 1980-2008 discrepancy between GISS and UAH is important, as it is nearly equal to the claimed warming trend since 1980.

Taking this one step further, I made a graph of the difference between the GISS and UAH monthly anomalies since 1980.

As you can see below, the discrepancy has increased over time.  Using Google’s linest() function, the divergence between GISS and UAH is increasing at a rate of 0.32C/century.  (GISS uses a different baseline than UAH, but the slope of the difference should be zero, if the data sets correlated properly.)  The slope is not zero, which indicates an inconsistency between the data sets.

2009-01-17_194329

Raw data from here: http://www.woodfortrees.org/data/gistemp/from:1980/plot/uah/from:1980

Calculations done here. http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pj0h2MODqj3gD6evaxHq_bw

Factoring in the baseline

Some readers will undoubtedly again point out that the GISS baseline (”normal”) temperature is lower than the UAH baseline.  This is true, but as I said above does not affect the slope calculation.  The difference between the GISS and UAH monthly baselines is a constant, which affects the relative position along the y-axis – but it does not affect the slope. Subtracting a monthly constant from each point in a graph does not alter the slope over a large set of years.  It only alters the y-offset.

The equation of a line is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-offset.  m and b are completely independent.   The different baselines affect only b, not m.  If the UAH and GISS data were closely tracking each other, the slope (m) would be close to zero.  The fact that GISS shows 2008 temperatures much higher than 1980, and UAH shows 2008 temperatures lower than 1980, is also a clear indicator that the two data sets are divergent.

Steve McIntyre has coincidentally just done a similar comparison of NOAA USA yearly data vs. GISS USA yearly data (http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=4852), and came to the conclusion that the NOAA slope is even steeper than GISS, diverging from UAH by 0.39C/century.

This would imply that NOAA is diverging from UAH by an even larger amount than GISS is diverging from UAH.

Clearly, problems exist with both datasets.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

varning-2

About these ads

Etiketter: , ,

8 svar to “The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data”

  1. The Big dropout of weather stations since 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years By sophiaalbertina Som ett komplement till mitt inlägg The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data kommer här mera om hur GISS förhåller sig till UAH och RSS sedan år [...]

  2. GISS Climate Model already wrong after 5 years « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] Climate Models,  The Big dropout of weather stations since 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years,  The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data,  More on the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data and the mess they have,  The world has [...]

  3. All Oceans are steadily cooling « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data [...]

  4. The Globe is Cooling and the temperatures keep going down « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data [...]

  5. Fatal Errors in IPCC’S Global Climate Models « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data [...]

  6. Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 243 « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data [...]

  7. November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data. [...]

  8. How the world temperature “record” was manipulated trough dropping of stations « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    [...] The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data. [...]

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


Följ

Få meddelanden om nya inlägg via e-post.

Gör sällskap med 232 andra följare

%d bloggare gillar detta: