Which means that only 20 % where climate scientists or had ”some dealing with climate”. Talking about ”consensus” and the ”debate is over and there is nothing to discuss”.
This according to William Schlesinger (president of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies) a strong Global Warming Alarmist and a big fan of IPCC.
During the question and answer session of last week’s William Schlesinger/John Christy global warming debate, (alarmist) Schlesinger was asked how many members of United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were actual climate scientists. It is well known that many, if not most, of its members are not scientists at all. Its president, for example, is an economist. This question came after Schlesinger had cited the IPCC as an authority for his position. His answer was quite telling. First he broadened it to include not just climate scientists but also those who have had ”some dealing with the climate.” His complete answer was that he thought, ”something on the order of 20 percent have had some dealing with climate.” In other words, even IPCC worshiper Schlesinger now acknowledges that 80 percent of the IPCC membership had absolutely no dealing with the climate as part of their academic studies.
This shatters so much of the alarmists’ claim, as they almost always appeal to the IPCC as their ultimate authority. Slain.”
Se also my posts:
A Litmus Test for Global Warming and the Climate Models, CLIMATE MODELS FOR MONKEYS, 8 years of global cooling and 4 years of rapid global cooling, Lies the IPCC will tell you, Documenting the global warming fraud – ”Getting Rid” of the Medieval Warming Period
The question here (3:50-4:05):
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>