GISS Climate Model already wrong after 5 years

Här kommer mera om de felaktiga klimat modeller som hela Global Warming Hysterin bygger på. Som våra intälägänta politiker och massmedia dyrkar. Och är villiga att offra vanligt folks välstånd och sina länders ekonomier för.

I det här fallet är det GISS Modell E som har detaljstuderats från år 2003 till 2013:

”Extended trend IS ALREADY TOO HIGH by 0,15C or More in THE FIRST 5 YEARS”.

”Another way to look at is they have huge GHG temperature impacts built in (no way to get to +3.0C without it) but they need to build in almost as big negative temperature impacts from other sources to keep the hindcast close to the actual temperatures we have seen so far.

One could conclude they are just plugging the big negative numbers into the hindcast after the fact to make it work.

Which is close to the point Leland Teschler was trying to make in this article. (seen here)”

Se även min inlägg:  A Litmus Test for Global Warming and the Climate Models,  The Big dropout of weather stations since 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years,  The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data,  More on the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data and the mess they have,  The world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data,  Minus 60 C or not?,  Documenting the global warming fraud – ”Getting Rid” of the Medieval Warming Period

Graphs here:

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/2107/modeleextraev0.png

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/8594/modeleextend2013gi9.png

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/6131/modeleghgvsotherbc9.png

GISS E Model here

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/modelE/

Article here:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/02/19/short-term-trends-from-giss-model-e-the-model-would-be-off-by-about-015c-in-the-first-five-years/

Detail

Detail

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

About these ads

Taggar: IPCC, Klimatmodeller, Temperaturdata