THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!

Här kommer en mycket träffande beskrivning av ”environmentalism” och Global Warming hysterin. Om hur själva kärnan i denna religion och politik är att göra allting så OBEKVÄMT, DYRT och STATISKT som möjligt. Och hur man i grunden har en anti human inställning då man anser att människan är grunden till ALLA problem. Samt att man avskyr ALLT vad teknisk utveckling heter.

Visst är det ett trevligt gäng?

Citat:

”Environmentalism is an anti-human, anti-science-and-technology religion which has gripped the world. It worships a nebulous undefined indefinable entity called The Environment which has some of the characteristics of the Christian Heaven, is an ideal place, existing somewhere on the earth, but without humans. It is a jealous God, demanding ever increasing sacrifices to satisfy its demands.”

The essential dogma of Environmentalism is the belief that humans are destroying the earth, or, as they prefer it, the planet.. Evolution is invariably harmful, and is exclusively conducted by humans. It must be prevented at whatever cost.

”The environment” is envisaged as one or more ”ecosystems”, patterned on the Garden of Eden,  unchanging, static, ”balanced” associations of organisms which are ”fragile”, and ”threatened” by evolution, which is wielded exclusively by humans, whose every activity ”damages” this idyllic  paradise. Evolution has to be stopped, or even reversed.

The necessary and universal mechanism of evolution, the extinction of organisms which can no longer survive, to be replaced by the newcomers, is seen as evil. ”Endangered species” have to be preserved at all costs, and the newly evolving ones exterminated as pests.

Sustainability is the reverse of evolution. It is a bedfellow with conservatism and conservation.  People dislike change, so we must stop it.

Humans, like other creatures, survive by modifying the world in our favour. There is therefore something to be said for maintainability, such as measures to keep fish stocks at a reasonable level, or to preserve the fertility of soil, but retainability, keeping things the same for its own sake, is futile. Evolution happens whatever you try to do to stop it. Sustainable development is an oxymoron, a contradiction.

The Precautionary Principle does the reverse. The greatest precautions and the greatest costs are to be taken when the risk is small or even zero. All risks are exaggerated and the highest cost and greatest inconvenience are always chosen.

Developments in technology are always harmful and dangerous, and must be prevented. This applies particularly to Genetic Modification and Nuclear Power..

Instead of choosing the cheapest alternative of an action, environmentalists insist on the most expensive, because the Environment requires it. This may take the form of protracted legal cost for permission, or the use of unnecessarily expensive technology.

Thus vehicles must burn biofuels which raise the price of food and increase poverty. An extreme example is the use of hydrogen in vehicles. This is expensive, inconvenient and dangerous, so we must do it.

Reverse economics is now being applied internationally. The disasters caused by environmentalism such as the high cost of energy and food, are being tackled by the least effective method, the printing of money. This is the policy which led to the downfall of the German Weimar Republic, and is the cause of the current disaster in Zimbabwe.

The advertising industry has softened up the public to accept the most outrageous swindles by endless repetition, the use of phony logic and the endorsement by celebrities. Science is in decline and is being taken over by the pseudoscience of the environment. It has thus become possible to put over on the public the most outrageous spin ever. They have selected, distorted and fabricated scientific results to justify the environmentalist creed with huge success. Everything can be ”linked” with  disaster  whatever the probability.

They get repeated free advertising in nearly all media and ”debate” no longer exists. Every event is referred to environmentalist priests for comment. Other comments are not welcome. Some people make a lot of money out of it.

Se även inlägget Women will be returned to the Dark Ages if the eco-fundamentalists end up having their way

Artikeln finns här:

http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=252&Itemid=1

 Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>

 

NZCLIMATE & ENVIRO TRUTH NO 169

9 APRIL 2008

by Dr Vincent Gray

THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED

THE ENVIRONMENT

Environmentalism is an anti-human, anti-science-and-technology religion which has gripped the world. It worships a nebulous undefined indefinable entity called The Environment which has some of the characteristics of the Christian Heaven, is an ideal place, existing somewhere on the earth, but without humans. It is a jealous God, demanding ever increasing sacrifices to satisfy its demands.

 HUMANS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EARTH

The Christian religion considers that God is responsible for the earth. In Genesis, (Verse 28), humans merely have ”dominion” over ”every living thing”. The Environmentalists have now taken over full responsibility from God  and we not only have ”dominion” we are fully responsible. By contrast, Science, from evolutionary theory, has shown that all organisms struggle to survive, with varying success, but each is responsible for its own welfare.

HUMANS ARE DESTROYING THE EARTH

The essential dogma of Environmentalism is the belief that humans are destroying the earth, or, as they prefer it, the planet.. Evolution is invariably harmful, and is exclusively conducted by humans. It must be prevented at whatever cost.

ECOSYSTEMS

”The environment” is envisaged as one or more ”ecosystems”, patterned on the Garden of Eden,  unchanging, static, ”balanced” associations of organisms which are ”fragile”, and ”threatened” by evolution, which is wielded exclusively by humans, whose every activity ”damages” this idyllic  paradise. Evolution has to be stopped, or even reversed.

ENDANGERED SPECIES

The necessary and universal mechanism of evolution, the extinction of organisms which can no longer survive, to be replaced by the newcomers, is seen as evil. ”Endangered species” have to be preserved at all costs, and the newly evolving ones exterminated as pests.

No ”endangered species” has ever become extinct, so the danger does not actually exist.

BIODIVERSITY

Environmentalists, having canonised species, promote the doctrine that there is a moral quality in species diversity. This usually means organisms of a similar, or greater size than humans. Biodiversity never claims to include all organisms. Variety in organisms is influenced by many factors, notably climate. Tropical forests have more diverse plants and animals than a temperate-zone forest, but that does not make them morally superior.

SUSTAINABILITY

Sustainability is the reverse of evolution. It is a bedfellow with conservatism and conservation.  People dislike change, so we must stop it. King Canute learned that he could not stop the waves, but today we must continually try to do so.

Humans, like other creatures, survive by modifying the world in our favour. There is therefore something to be said for maintainability, such as measures to keep fish stocks at a reasonable level, or to preserve the fertility of soil, but retainability, keeping things the same for its own sake, is futile. Evolution happens whatever you try to do to stop it. Sustainable development is an oxymoron, a contradiction.

FUTURE GENERATIONS

Since we are ”damaging” ”the environment” we must stop doing it, and maintain a static world for future generations. The world will evolve whether we like it or not.  Future generations will face challenges and problems which we cannot comprehend. They will not thank us for making plans which may turn out to be harmful. It is enough to try and cope with our own problems, with provision for only a short time ahead, sufficient for our very limited insight into what the future may hold.

THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE

The scientific discipline of Risk Analysis assesses precautions to be taken against unexpected hazards according to the degree of risk and the cost of the precautions.

The Precautionary Principle does the reverse. The greatest precautions and the greatest costs are to be taken when the risk is small or even zero. All risks are exaggerated and the highest cost and greatest inconvenience are always chosen.

 MAXIMUM INCONVENIENCE

The Environment demands that everything we do must be as inconvenient as possible. The most convenient form of transport is cars, so they must be restricted and we must be made to travel by public transport, by bicycles, walking, or perhaps by bringing back the horses.

Riding bicycles is much more dangerous than driving cars, but we must sacrifice some human lives to the Environment God.

Plastic bags and other plastic objects are too convenient and too cheap. We must replace them with something that costs more.

ECONOMY INSTEAD OF INFRASTRUCTURE

Instead of building new power stations, better roads, or water treatment plant, we must make do with the out-of-date and poorly-maintained by economising on everything.

DEPLETED RESOURCES

”Resources” are finite, so we are running out of oil, water, food, minerals energy. History shows that there is only a shortage of prosperity and ingenuity.

TECHNOLOGY MUST BE STOPPED

Developments in technology are always harmful and dangerous, and must be prevented. This applies particularly to Genetic Modification and Nuclear Power..

TOXICOLOGY REDEFINED

All chemicals are ”toxic”. Since the entire universe, including our own bodies, consist of chemicals, everything is hostile. Scientific toxicology tells us that toxicity is a matter of dose. Most chemicals are either harmless or beneficial in small quantities. Their ”toxicity” must be exaggerated even when they are harmless..

RADIOACTIVITY INVARIABLY HARMFUL

There are three kinds of radiation, alpha, which is a helium nucleus, beta which is an electron, and gamma which is short wave form of electromagnetic radiation, such as radio or light.

Alpha, being heavy particles, is easily absorbed even by air, so presents no hazard unless swallowed. Beta is an electron and similarly without hazard externally. Gamma rays are very penetrating, but only above a certain level. Our surroundings give off radiation to which our bodies are probably immune, and slight increases are harmless. Radioactive substances with a long half-life, such as uranium (4 1⁄2 billion years, particularly when ”depleted”) and plutonium (20,000. years but beta) are harmless, unless swallowed.

REVERSE ECONOMICS

Instead of choosing the cheapest alternative of an action, environmentalists insist on the most expensive, because the Environment requires it. This may take the form of protracted legal cost for permission, or the use of unnecessarily expensive technology.

Thus vehicles must burn biofuels which raise the price of food and increase poverty. An extreme example is the use of hydrogen in vehicles. This is expensive, inconvenient and dangerous, so we must do it.

Reverse economics is now being applied internationally. The disasters caused by environmentalism such as the high cost of energy and food, are being tackled by the least effective method, the printing of money. This is the policy which led to the downfall of the German Weimar Republic, and is the cause of the current disaster in Zimbabwe.

UNIVERSAL SPIN

The advertising industry has softened up the public to accept the most outrageous swindles by endless repetition, the use of phony logic and the endorsement by celebrities. Science is in decline and is being taken over by the pseudoscience of the environment. It has thus become possible to put over on the public the most outrageous spin ever. They have selected, distorted and fabricated scientific results to justify the environmentalist creed with huge success. Everything can be ”linked” with  disaster  whatever the probability.

They get repeated free advertising in nearly all media and ”debate” no longer exists. Every event is referred to environmentalist priests for comment. Other comments are not welcome. Some people make a lot of money out of it.

Dr Goebbels lives!

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 23 April 2008 ) 

Annonser

Etiketter: ,

22 svar to “THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!”

  1. How the world was bullied into silence over the Global Warming Hysteria « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] Se my posts:  How we know that they, the Global Warming Hysterics, know they are lying,  Global Warming Hysteria – Governments AND Media Together Close Down The Debate,  Global Warming Skeptics: Why Do They Exist?,  Global Warming Mass Hysteria at it’s peak – scaremongering is the name of the game,  The Greenhouse Conspiracy,  Money Behind Warming Alarmism ‘Can Corrupt Anybody’,  Academic inquiry failing on global warming,  Enron – The BIG Sponsor of Global Warming Hysteria!,  Advice on the matter of climate change is poisoned by fear among many scientists!,  “Blue Planet in Green Shackles”,  The dangers of adopting an apocalyptic mindset when addressing the issue of climate change,  “Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion” – 2,  “Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion”,  Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism,  ‘Grantsmanship’ – The Iron triangle between researchers, government and media That Distorts Global Warming Science,  The church of green – You have to repent or be forever dammed!,  THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!, […]

  2. Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] people to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.,  THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than […]

  3. The Global Warming Crowd will Attack Anyone who dares to speak his mind « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] Se also my posts: How the world was bullied into silence over the Global Warming Hysteria,  How we know that they, the Global Warming Hysterics, know they are lying,  Global Warming Hysteria – Governments AND Media Together Close Down The Debate,  Global Warming Skeptics: Why Do They Exist?,  Global Warming Mass Hysteria at it’s peak – scaremongering is the name of the game,  The Greenhouse Conspiracy,  Money Behind Warming Alarmism ‘Can Corrupt Anybody’,  Academic inquiry failing on global warming,  Enron – The BIG Sponsor of Global Warming Hysteria!,  Advice on the matter of climate change is poisoned by fear among many scientists!,  “Blue Planet in Green Shackles”,  The dangers of adopting an apocalyptic mindset when addressing the issue of climate change,  “Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion” – 2,  “Environmentalism has replaced socialism as the leading secular religion”,   ‘Grantsmanship’ – The Iron triangle between researchers, government and media That Distorts Global Warming Science,  The church of green – You have to repent or be forever dammed!,  THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!, […]

  4. Why greens don’t want to ‘solve’ climate change « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate change,  […]

  5. The Origin and Life Cycle of Junk Science – OR Global Warming Hysteria « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology! […]

  6. Flu-Bird Says:

    A bunch of greens were at our local countu fair spreading their lies aboud dams along the KLAMATH RIVER they were saying all this poppycock that thge dams are harming the fish when that a load of cow poo we certianly dont need a wild and scenic river here in the state of JEFFERSON(NORTHERN CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN OREGON)AND WE DONT NEED ANYMORE un AT ALL

  7. The blatant hypocrisy from the UN pack and their jet set allies « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology! […]

  8. Save the Planet, Kill Yourself « brika's blog Says:

    […] the environmentalist creed: anti-human, anti-scientific, anti-technology Posted by brika Filed in Uncategorized Leave a Comment » […]

  9. brika Says:

    I like this… linked it to my blog.
    http://www.brika.wordpress.com

    thank you!

    • sophiaalbertina Says:

      Thank you yourselves.

      And welcome to the fight for facts and common sense against The Global Warming Hysteria and its so called “environmentalism” which at its roots is anti-human, anti-science and-anti-technology.

      Nice bunch!

  10. The IPCC must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices! « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.,  THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than […]

  11. Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 248 « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  […]

  12. Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 348 « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology! […]

  13. D_Spoyla Says:

    How old are you guys? (I’ll bet you I don’t see this comment posted to your site.)

  14. D_Spoyla Says:

    My mistake. It seems that you do welcome a dialogue and not just common vitriolic hyperbole. Can any one of you give me something tangible to refute. There are many nonspecific issues here I would like to understand your objections to responsible stewardship of a planet where human beings have, if not now then certainly in the near future, an impact on the well being of our environment.

  15. D_Spoyla Says:

    Sorry, my mistake again. I posted to the wrong page.

  16. Climate Gate round two « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […]  THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology! […]

  17. The ethical question no climate denier will answer - Page 35 (politics) Says:

    […] Did you bother reading it ? Do you have any opinion on it ? Agree … disagree ? …. what ? https://uddebatt.wordpress.com/2008/0…ti-technology/ Reply With […]

  18. Theron Says:

    Today, I went to the beach front with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave
    it to my 4 year oold daughter and said ”You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it inched her ear.
    Shee never wants to go back! LoL I know this iis entirely off topic
    but I had to tll someone!

  19. Tahlia Says:

    You’re so interesting! I don’t think I’ve truly read a single
    thing like this before. So nice to find another person with a few unique
    thoughts on this subject. Really.. maqny thanks for starting thhis up.
    This website is something that is required on the web, someone
    with a bit of originality!

  20. Margareta Says:

    Very good article. I absolutely lovee this site.
    Continue the good work!

  21. Mitchell Says:

    whoah this weblog is fantastic i really like reading your posts.
    Stay up the good work! You realize, a lot of people are searching around for this information, you
    could help them greatly.

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Google+-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


%d bloggare gillar detta: