Archive for 23 maj, 2008

The Unholy Alliance that manufactured Global Warming

23 maj, 2008

Här kommer en uppföljare i Tim Balls intressanta artikelserie om Global Warming Hysterin från igår. Och om hur den styrs av en politisk agenda (som jag har konstaterat flera gånger om i mina inlägg). Samt ”The Hockey Stick” skandalen.:

Artikeln finns här:

 Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>


Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism

23 maj, 2008

And when you are at it – the rest of the World too.

This is happening HERE AND NOW. People are being burnt alive and hacked to pieces. Gruesome? You bet! Horrible – yes. But desperate people do sometimes do desperate things.

        Picture from the South African newspapper Beeld


Do you think the Nobel Price winners IPCC, Al Gore and the rest of the Global Warming Hysterics pack care?   Nah…they are very busy spending trillions upon trillions of dollars of your tax money on something much, much more important than saving lives here and now.

Namely, they are ”fighting” something that MIGHT HAPPEN (IF the climate models are right – which they are not, se my previous posts) IN 100 years – a temperature rise of 2-4 F.

Wow! That’s a worthy goal isn’t. I mean how cares about people killing themselves, dying of starvation or some ”obscure” disease that take tens of thousand of lives a year here and now. And you don’t need computer models to figure that out either – you just have to go out on the streets.

There’s to much population anyway – they are actually saying that. When you instead can ”fight” the great enemy CO2 lurking in a distant future.

All of this is led by the holly church of IPCC and it’s chief priest (and saint) Al Gore. Who is constantly spreading the message of near Gloom and Doom if we do not obey him and his church. And if you question this superstition you are immediately excommunicated and shunned.

And ALL the politicians and news media are worshiping and prostrating before their altar of carbon trading. Obediently following every whim and decree from the high church.

The problem is that the priesthood of Global Warming Hysterics are not exactly living as they preach. On the contrary – they live a very luxurious life and DO ALL THE THINGS that they preach and say the common man should not do.

Seems like fair and righteous deal doesn’t it? We do ALL the hard work and ALL the sacrifices and they take ALL our money.

At the same time as they are spending enormous sums of your tax money on their VERY important (except for themselves) nonsense mission. They do not forget to tell you ALL the time what a great burden they have so we should understand how REALLY important these people are. And what an important function THEY play in saving the planet. And how grateful we the people should be for that.

And that they can not be disturbed fulfilling this important mission by such trivial matters as people dying of starvation or curable diseases and civil wars etc.

But this is not a problem (that they are not living as they preach ) since news papers and TV are very obedient and loyally preach the message and sings the Gospel. And has since long forgotten what it meant to be a journalist. Or a politician in service of the public.

This my friends is the sad state of the ”civilized” world today. If you didn’t know otherwise you would think this is some scene from medieval times with it’s pagan rituals and worship. And with the letters of indulgence (carbon credits) paying for our carbon sins and repenting to Kyoto.

And I hold all politicians and so called scientists and so called journalists accountable for this sorry state of affairs because they took ACTIVE part in it and promoted it. And they did ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO STOPP this madness for all these years.


This is the dream world according to IPCC, Al Gore and all Global Warming Hysterics:

      Girl on here way to school the carbon friendly way

            Mass transit a la IPCC and Al Gore

  Eco friendly housing in the IPCC/Al Gore future world

We in the industrialized world would be reduced to subservient living. And the developing world efforts to give it’s citizens a decent living standard would be stopped in it’s tracks and they would be reduced to mass poverty.

Lo and behold isn’t that a worthy goal!. You toil and work hard to reduce your own AND everybody else’s living standard. Yeah that’s a motivator all right!

See the picture before you – mom and dad is proudly telling their children that they are working VERY, VERY HARD to REDUCE their own living standard, their children’s and the grandchildren’s.

We would be the first generation IN HISTORY who on purpose and willingly reduce our economic, social and living standard. AND FORCE the rest of the world to do the same regardless of WHAT THEY WANT!

This global mass madness is led by politicians, newspapers/TV and so called scientists. Because they are blindly following some computer models that cannot predict even the weather two weeks from now! Or accurately simulate how the weather was two weeks ago!

All in the name of reducing the increase of global temperature 2-4 F in 100 years.

And this is the same Earth how have survived drastic shifts (often in very short time spans) in climate and weather through is long history.

On a DAILY basis the temperature can easily vary 80 F in the same location. And the difference between the warmest and coldest spot on earth THE SAME DAY can vary 220 F (Vostok and Death Valley averages). And this we have survived (and worse) without problems for centuries.

And the difference between the record coldest -129 F (the Vostok Station in Antarctica on July 21, 1983) and the record warmest 136 F (El Azizia, Libya on Sept. 13, 1922) is a whopping 265 F!

Or take the state of Montana where the difference between the record warmest and coldest is an impressive 187 F. And the people of Montana are still there and thriving.

And somehow the earth managed to survive that. But a minuscule predicted increase of 2-4 F in 100 years is supposed to mean total disaster for our civilization! And such a catastrophe that the politicians and scientist are going to sacrifice all of our wealth and living standards.

Isn’t it fantastic how suddenly the human race have become very, very fragile. We can somehow survive an 80 F variation in temperature during one day. But a predicted 2-4 F increase in 100 years we cannot handle according to the Global Warming Hysterics.

To give you just one example of how absurd this whole Global Warming Hysteria is:

Here in Stockholm the temperature recently DROPPED 38 F in a matter of 10-11 hours (Yeah that’s right! It dropped 10 -18 times more in 10 hours than the predicted rise in 100 years). But there was NO emergency meeting of the cabinet or extra session of the parliament or huge headlines in the news papers to ”deal” with this ”emergency”. Why?

Because nothing happened. Every one, including the cabinet, parliament and news media, went about their lives as normal as nothing had happened. It was colder of course but that’s about it.

Isn’t it strange that a drop in temperature 10 -18 times stronger in 10 hours than the predicted rise in temperature in 100 years, and no one reacts because it’s considered ”normal” weather and demands no action ? And yet the same governments get hysteric about the PREDICTED 2-4 F rise in 100 years by the computer models?

And they are willing to sacrifice our wealth and economic living standard and spend trillions of dollars to ”fight” this predicted rise of temperature by the computer models. And they are also willing to sacrifice the developing countries in the process.

These people – TOTALLY without any sense of proportions, priorities and what is important for the survival of the human race and the Earth – We have entrusted to rule our countries?

So in the words of  Professor Emeritus WJR Alexander, University of Pretoria, South Africa

               OUT OF AFRICA

The IPCC recommendations will destroy our continent.

Global warming fallacies:

Rainfall is NOT decreasing.

River flow is NOT decreasing.

Tropical cyclones (hurricanes) are NOT increasing.

Floods are NOT increasing.

Droughts are NOT increasing.

Desertification is NOT increasing.

Plant and animal species are NOT under threat.

The priority of African nations is the welfare of their citizens.

African nations are suspicious of the motives of the industrialised nations of


Africa wants trade not aid.

Se also my posts to name but a few: They are the worst sort of people to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate changeClearing out the environmental fogThe Flawed science behind the Kyoto protocol!Scare the wits out of people with Global warming, then make money off their fear.Giant Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your WayWomen will be returned to the Dark Ages if the eco-fundamentalists end up having their wayA ”Nobel” Folly!Global warming is probably the biggest scientific boondoggle since the days of GalileoGreen tax revolt: Britons ‘will not foot bill to save planet’Why on earth do we put up with this green extortion?Don’t Freak Out! Climate sense instead of nonsense.

His memo can be found here.

Some more quotes from Professor Alexander:

”I have no idea what the impact will be on international recipients. How can I persuade you that these real-life situations should receive more recognition than papers published in Nature or in the peer-reviewed literature? Which should interest readers most – polar bears in the Arctic or people being set alight in the streets of our cities?

There is a connection. Pressure is being exerted on the developing nations to undertake costly measures that will not only be fruitless but will endanger the alleviation of poverty that is the root cause of the disturbances. Memo 16/08″

”The developed nations of the world are failing to put their money (i.e. their taxpayers’ money) where their mouth is. With the world slowly sinking into a recession (nobody has called it a depression — yet!) there is simply no way that the taxpayers of the developed countries will be persuaded to donate their hard earned cash for some suffering communities in Africa, on the scale required for poverty alleviation. Copenhagen will fail for the same reason that Kyoto failed.

The developing nations, including South Africa, should start looking after their own interests. In particular, we should ignore the small band of intellectually challenged malcontents in South Africa, who are trying to persuade us to ”save the environment” by reducing those pesky greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power stations, heavy industries, motor vehicles and air transport. Fortunately, their attempts have become more amusing than serious.

The local climate alarmists are struggling to produce something new that will result in newspaper headlines. They dare not mention that the world stopped warming in 1998. If they did, even the dumbest readers will ask how the alarmists can claim that climate change is already causing environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity, while the climate remained stable for the past ten years. The international earth science conference held in Cape Town last week on this subject was only mentioned in one of the Sunday papers.”

”We are all getting tired of those unverifiable computer-generated predictions based on suspect science. Are we really expected to believe this nonsense? Would these alarmists dare to address a meeting in Soweto or Mamelodi? Why not?”

All that I wish to say now is that this whole climate alarmism is a madness that we could all do well without. We can then get on with solving the real humanitarian issues of this country, and not be sidelined by all this environmentalist nonsense that is permeating our government departments and research institutions.”

”I have personal knowledge and experience of this in South Africa and neighbouring countries. I have produced commissioned reports. Most of them were confidential. Others had a requirement that I destroy all material used in the reports. What I can say with complete confidence is that the only way to prevent this drift to the cities is to keep the people on the land both directly for agriculture and indirectly by the establishment of rural mining and other industries. This in turn will require the abolishment of legislation that elevates environmental concerns above human welfare concerns. Read again the last paragraph of the Sunday Times article quoted above. The ONLY long-term solution is poverty reduction.”

”Finally, please refer to the attached copy of the circular that my colleagues and I distributed illegally at the UNFCCC conference in Bali last December. The third photograph is one that I took in Alexandra. The other two were taken by my son in northern Namibia. We were not welcome at the conference. Humanitarian concerns do not feature in the United Nations Kyoto Protocol and the Copenhagen agreement that is intended to replace it. The lives and livelihood of tens of millions of starving people on the African continent are at stake. Who cares? Certainly not the environmental extremists and the scientists who fail to express humanitarian concerns.”

Where are those vociferous scientists who churned out newspaper headlines pleading for our suffering biodiversity now? They should be hanging their heads in shame.

Is it wishful thinking to believe that South Africans in the natural sciences will abandon their lucrative positions on climate change and organise a conference that specifically addresses the huge humanitarian crisis that is more likely to grow than subside unless calm heads get together to seek urgent solutions?

What about the looming drought? During the past two months I pleaded that my research predictions be evaluated by an independent body. My request was met by total silence. Or was it indifference?

These events are sure to trigger another wave of emigration. Who can blame them when there are no attempts to rectify the situation, and our scientists have their heads in the clouds figuratively as well as literally? I know that I have a lot of support in South Africa and internationally. It is now up to others to start taking action.

 Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=”” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>

%d bloggare gillar detta: