There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change

Här kommer en intressant artikel av professor Kelvin Kemm från Sydafrika i dagens Engineering News. Där han tar upp det ekonomiska vansinnet bakom hela systemet med carbon trading. Och hur ovetenskaplig hela Global Warming Hysterin är.

Se även bl.a. mina inlägg: Global Warming as Mass Neurosis, Global Warming: Has the Climate Sensitivity Holy Grail Been Found?Global Warming Hysteria – Every attempt so far to get emissions under control turns out to be about money, IPCC Expert Reviewer – The present warm phase is no more than one of those naturally driven cycles.The Greenhouse Conspiracy, This is what the Global Warming Hysteria is all about – 0,03%!A Climate of Belief – The Story of Climate models!Money Behind Warming Alarmism ‘Can Corrupt Anybody’Enron – The BIG Sponsor of Global Warming Hysteria!Validation, Evaluation and Exaggeration from the IPCC, Carbon and Kyoto zombies attack our economy and is a campaign for austerity!Greens thwart gasoline production and hurt their teammates at the same time!Global Warming must be stopped – The future of our civilization lies in the balance!Has Global Warming Research Misinterpreted Cloud Behavior?Study of Greenland Ice Finds Rapid Change in Past ClimateWorld’s Scariest Words: ‘I’m an Environmentalist and I’m Here to Help’Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalismThey are the worst sort of people to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate changeClearing out the environmental fog,

Se även mina inlägg om carbon trading: The scariest organization you ever seen – Take your children and run before they tax you to death!Billions wasted on UN climate carbon offsetting programmeGREEN CORRUPTION: UNITED NATIONS CARBON CREDIT SCHEME ACCUSED OF FRAUDRussia will not sell it’s emission rightsWhy the carbon trading scheme is impossible and unjustGreen tax revolt: Britons ‘will not foot bill to save planet’A Big Nyet: Russia Doesn’t Want any Binding Caps on Carbon!Global warming proposals would gut N.C. economy,  An Organization Diagram from Hell – Welcome to carbon trading!,  Carbon plan ‘to cost business $22bn’”Emissions Trading – a Weapon of Mass Taxation”,  Giant Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your WayDon’t bother with emissions trading law, the Chambers of Commerce tells MPsEurope finds that cutting carbon emissions is far easier said than done.  Geschäftet och fusket med handeln av utsläppsrätter!A Carbon fantasy that will bankrupt us!,  EU:s CO2 policy – The hot air of hypocrisy!,  Self-Interest: Inconvenient Truth of Climate Change!,  The Price Tag – Kostnaderna för Global Warming för VANLIGT FOLK -2!,  The Price Tag – Kostnaderna för Global Warming för VANLIGT FOLK!,  $ 2,9 Biljoner i sänkt BNP för en sänkning av CO2 på 25 ppm!,  De ekonomiska realiteterna av Global Warming Hysterin,

Och se även mina inlägg om hur USA påverkas av en carbon trading tax: Democratic Senators rebelled against their leadership and opposed the Boxer Climate Tax BillAmerica’s native criminal class – The CongressThe USA policy towards Kyoto,  Global Warming Hysterics view rising fuel costs as ‘the best thing that can possibly happen.’They Will Tax You to Death by cap and trade, But They Can’t Even Run a Restaurant!  Cap and Burn – Bye Bye Lieberman-WarnerThe scariest organization you ever seen – Take your children and run before they tax you to death!This carbon bill isn’t the answerCap and Spend – The largest income redistribution scheme since the income tax!,  We Don’t Need a Climate Tax on the PoorClimate Reality Bites with Cap and trade – This is a giant revenue grabSacrifices to the Climate Gods Beware Lieberman-Warner, Just Call It ‘Cap-and-Tax’The Economic Costs of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Change LegislationDemocrats Fall OutMcWavering: What’s the Deal-Breaker for Lieberman-Warner?Obamas Big Carbon FootprintHow Hawaii Will Be Affected by the Lieberman-Warner Global Climate Change LegislationClimate Catastrophe for The state of WashingtonGlobal warming proposals would gut N.C. economyCarbon plan ‘to cost business $22bn’,

Artikeln finns här:

There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change

By: Kelvin Kemm

Published: 4 Jul 08 – 0:00 

During 2008, have we seen many stories in the newspapers about 2007 being particularly warm as a result of global warming?

During 2006, the doomsters were predicting that 2007 would be the hottest year on record, so why have we seen no reports about this?

The answer is simple – 2007 turned out to be the coolest year for 30 years. It is also the case that there has been no global warming since 1998. In fact, since 1998, there has been steady cooling.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

Even more dramatic is the fact that the most recent computer model predictions indicate that there will be no more global warming for the next ten years. But the doomsters say that, after this ten-year period, global warming will come back with a vengeance. Why?

Certainly, mankind’s production of carbon dioxide (CO2) has continued to increase since 1998 and will continue to increase, particularly since countries such as China and India say that their economic growth comes first, so they do not intend worrying too much about CO2 production.

I have repeatedly pointed out that there is little or no link between CO2 production by mankind and a rise in global temperature. In fact, indications are that it is the opposite – an increased temperature causes more CO2 to be ejected into the atmosphere.

In the time of the Viking settlements on Greenland, about 1 000 years ago, there was a period of warming. That is why the Viking settlements flourished and they could grow grapes and maize, which puzzled the archaeologists.

Then it cooled, and the last Viking supply ship arrived at the settlements in 1410, after which it all froze up.

The world then experienced the Little Ice Age, during the time of Shakespeare and Jan van Riebeeck. The Thames froze over, and there was a period of economic decline, in comparison to the economic boom during the Medieval period of global warming.

There was also an earlier warming period, known as the Roman Warming, during the period of Roman economic prosperity.

All of this warming and cooling happened without any contribution from any man-made CO2. Indications in our modern times are that the warming observed up to the end of 2006 has been due to a natural cycle in the intensity of the sun.

This was, by all indications, the same source of warming of the Medieval and Roman Warming periods. But now South Africa wants to impose a carbon tax aimed at cutting South Africa‘s emission of greenhouse gases. I think this is wrong. The proposal is for a 2c/kWh tax to be imposed from September.

This is expected to generate R4-billion a year for the National Treasury. But the economics folks point out that this 2c tax translates into a 10% increase in the electricity cost.

One of the reasons why South Africa uses a large amount of electricity is that we have major exports whose production is energy intensive, such as gold, steel and aluminium. We do not export watches like the Swiss, or computer software like the Irish, so to quote our per capita production of CO2 is stupid.

The tax, I am told, is to incentivise the use of renewable sources of power, such as wind, solar and hydro. This is crazy too. I am all in favour of wind and solar, but only if such sources can stand on their own two feet in economic competition to our coal-fired power. To fake the economics is to do damage to our exports, and to the lifestyle of every citizen.

There is little or no indication that man-made CO2 is causing any climate change. There has been no global warming since 1998. The warming that did happen during the twentieth century happened mainly between 1920 and 1940. The year 2007 was the coolest year for 30 years.

For us to go with the flow, or dive into a panic mode, is crazy. Let us look after the health and welfare of our people first. This does not mean being irresponsible about any sources of pollution from industrial operations or any other activities. It means using genuine science, and not the scare tactics of world political manipulators, to come to really sensible conclusions.

 Copyright© Creamer Media (Pty) Ltd.

Etiketter: , ,

3 svar to “There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change”

  1. The IPCC must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices! « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] Global Warming as Mass Neurosis,  CO2 can not be blamed for Global Warming!,  There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change,   Global Warming Hysteria – Every attempt so far to get emissions under control turns out […]

  2. GLOBAL TEMPERATURE TRENDS FROM 2500 B.C. TO 2008 A.D. « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] data – What it really means.,  CO2 can not be blamed for Global Warming!,  There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change,  Climate Regime Shifts of the Past Four Centuries,  Global Warming: Has the Climate Sensitivity […]

  3. Hope_54321 (@Hope_54321) Says:

    Please see the following two articles:

    Firstly a 2009 nature article by Allen et al:

    Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne
    Myles R. Allen 1 , David J. Frame 1,2 , Chris Huntingford 3 , Chris D. Jones 4 , Jason A. Lowe 5
    , Malte Meinshausen 6 & Nicolai Meinshausen 7

    1 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK.
    2 Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, OX1 2BQ, UK.
    3 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,
    Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.
    4 Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK.
    5 Met Office Hadley Centre (Reading Unit), Department of Meteorology, University of
    Reading, RG6 6BB, Reading, UK.
    6 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14412 Potsdam, Germany.
    7 Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, OX1 3TG, UK

    And secondly a description of the theory relating to the effect of green house gasses


Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in: Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Google-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )


Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s

%d bloggare gillar detta: