The IPCC must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices!

Här kommer ytterligare ett upprop från olika vetenskapsmän MOT IPCC och hela Global Warming Hysterin. Hur ovetenskaplig denna teori är och hur skadlig de politiska besluten att ”bekämpa” CO2 är.

Som jag har konstaterat så många gånger tidigare i mina inlägg: hela Global Warming Hysterin handlar INTE om vetenskap och fakta UTAN STYRS av en politisk agenda.

Och det här är väldigt svårt för gemene man att förstå tyvärr. Som tror att det hela handlar om arr rädda vår planet när det i själva verket handlar om att reducera vår levnadsstandard till den nivå som vi hade på 1800 talet.

Först då kommer Global Warming Hysterikerna att vara NÅGORLUNDA nöjda!

Och ta hela skojeriet med dessa avgudade klimatmodellerna! Där de INTE ENS KLARAR AV ATT FÖRUTSE många av de viktiga och stora klimatpåverkande fenomen. Än mindre ALLA faktorer som påverkar klimatet. Eller vädret 10 dagar från nu eller hur vädret var för 10 dagar sedan.

 OCH DET ÄR SAMMA MODELLER SOM MAN VILL FÅ OSS ATT TRO KAN FÖRUTSÄGA TEMPERATUREN OM 100 år PÅ EN TIONDELSGRAD NÄR!

Det är alltså resultatet av dess av modeller som IPCC, Al Gore et consortes avgudar och som hela Global Warming Hysterin bygger på.  Och där man vill ”offra” större delen av värt ekonomiska välståd på dess altare för att blidka CO2 guden.

Återigen: Global Warming Hysterin är den största vetenskapliga och politiska skandalen ALLA kategorier detta århundrade!

Frågan är bara NÄR skall massmedia och våra politiker vakna upp och protestera mot detta monumentala åsiktsförtryck som pågår i ”vetenskapens” namn?

Nä, i stället så tiger massmedia och politiker och ställer sig beredvilligt i inkvisitionens tjänst. Det är beklämmande att skåda!

Se även andra protester bl.a.: An Open Letter to the Presidential Candidates on Global WarmingOpen letter to IPCC to renounce its current policy!Upproret växer – Nya omoraliska vetenskapsmän!Över 400 omoraliska vetenskapsmän!Öppet brev till FN och konferensen på Bali

 

Se även bl.a. mina inlägg: Temperature data – What it really means.This is what the Global Warming Hysteria is all about – 0,03%!The UN Climate Change Numbers Hoax eller IPCC:s lögn!The Unscientific way of IPCC:s forecasts eller IPPC:s lögn del 2!IPCC Review Editors comments reveald!, IPCC Review Editors – ”No Working Papers”, ”No Correspondence” are kept!Has the IPCC inflated the feedback factor?IPCC and its bias!Peer Review – What it actually meansIPCC models are incoherent and invalid from a scientific point of view!,  But the forecasts, especially for regional climate change, are immensely uncertain!The Greenhouse ConspiracyGlobal Warming as Mass NeurosisCO2 can not be blamed for Global Warming!There is no evidence man-made CO2 causes climate change,   Global Warming Hysteria – Every attempt so far to get emissions under control turns out to be about money, IPCC Expert Reviewer – The present warm phase is no more than one of those naturally driven cycles.,  A Climate of Belief – The Story of Climate models!Money Behind Warming Alarmism ‘Can Corrupt Anybody’Enron – The BIG Sponsor of Global Warming Hysteria!Validation, Evaluation and Exaggeration from the IPCC,  Carbon and Kyoto zombies attack our economy and is a campaign for austerity!Greens thwart gasoline production and hurt their teammates at the same time!Global Warming must be stopped – The future of our civilization lies in the balance!Has Global Warming Research Misinterpreted Cloud Behavior?World’s Scariest Words: ‘I’m an Environmentalist and I’m Here to Help’Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalismThey are the worst sort of people to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!,  The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate changeClearing out the environmental fog,   The Flawed science behind the Kyoto protocol!

Brevet från den 14 april finns här:

http://www.uncapsa.org/Topics/IPCC_letter_14April08-1.pdf

De nya brevet finns här:

http://www.tech-know.eu/uploads/Letter_UN_Sec_Gen_Ban_Ki-moon.pdf

Inlägget finns här:

http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1551

TO: UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, inquiries@un.org 14th of July, 2008

Copied to the G8 leaders

Dear Secretary General Ban Ki-moon,

The UN Climate Change Panel must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices – Policies based on false science must be ended

We, an independent group of experts in various aspects of science and the environment, ask you to redress the lack of scientific integrity of the UN’s Climate Change Panel (IPCC) and to stop them making reactionary and futile ‘Climate Change’ recommendations that hold back the developing world.

As you read this, policies that you endorse are already causing misery and starvation for the world’s poor.

On the 14th of April this year some of us wrote to the Chair of the IPCC, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, copied below and available on the UN CAPSA site (ref E), asking him to present clear and graphic evidence of the theory that carbon dioxide (CO2) drives global temperature. We pointed out that no such evidence exists and offered charts and references that refute the man-made global warming theory.

Dr. Pachauri has failed to respond. Perhaps he lacks the knowledge to defend his position. Nevertheless, the IPCC’s 51 ‘drafting and draft-contributing authors’ of the Summary for Policymakers (ref A) – not thousands as claimed – includes scientists who are surely obliged to provide such evidence if any exists.

For your illumination we refer you to:

(i) The chart in our letter of 14 April (page 3) which shows, using official data, that for the last decade World Temperatures have been falling whilst CO2 keeps rising, and

(ii) A geological (Greenland ice core) chart of polar climate covering the last 10,000 years (Ref B) which shows that while CO2 levels have been rising, temperatures have been falling since the Bronze Age around 4,000 years ago (see page 2).

The assertion that the recent rapid rise of CO2 is unique and dangerous is both deceptive and irrelevant because CO2 does not drive the world’s climate. Claims that such rapid rises have not happened before are not supported by ice-core or other geological records (ref C).

Either the IPCC is simply failing to notice these gross discrepancies or it is consciously evading or covering-up observations that challenge its theories.

Given the facts (i) above, from observations over the last decade alone, there can be no justification for trying to restrict CO2 levels and retard third-world development while temperatures are in fact falling (also see Note D). Considering data over the last 4,000 years (ii), in its Summary for Policymakers and in its Full Report, the IPCC depicts CO2 rising but fails to depict a corresponding fall in temperature.

From its obstinate resistance to answer inquiries – an insult to the public, let alone to other scientists – one can only conclude that the IPCC is engaged in a self-serving distortion of data acquired at public expense.

Whatever might have seemed the case ten years ago, now, with better data and understanding, there is clearly no evidence for the CO2-based theory of global warming. Indeed, there is only evidence against it. Therefore, as a matter of utmost importance we urge you to:

(1)Call the IPCC to account – Hold an Inquiry into its operations. Insist that it adhere to the same ‘prove and predict’ norms as other sciences. Further, noting its impotence in the face of contradictory evidence, lead the UN into abandoning the CO2-based theory of global warming and nullifying its former recommendations.

(2)Immediately announce your opposition to biofuels – whose large-scale production entails the displacement of food crops, thus raising the price of food and bringing starvation to the poor.

Please do not hesitate to ask us for further information or assistance and we will provide it directly or through other independent, qualified colleagues.

Yours sincerely,

Piers Corbyn Astrophysicist & forecaster, WeatherAction, UK piers@weatheraction.com

Vincent Gray IPCC Expert Reviewer, Climate Consultant, NZ vinmary.gray@paradise.net.nz

Richard Courtney IPCC Exp. Rev., Energy & Envir. Consultant, UK RichardSCourtney@aol.com

Hans Labohm IPCC Expert Reviewer, Economist & Author, Holland H.Labohm@freeler.nl

Will Alexander Prof. Em. Dept. Civil & Biosystems, South Africa alexwjr@iafrica.com

Don Parkes Prof. Human Ecology (Ret.) Australia & Japan dnp@networksmm.com.au

Joseph D’Aleo Certified Consultant Meteorologist, Fellow AMS, USA jdaleo@icecap.us

Svend Hendriksen Nobel Peace Prize 1988 (shared), Greenland hendriksen@greennet.gl

Alan Siddons Climate Researcher, USA alan618034@earthlink.net

Bob Ashworth Chem. Eng. (Energy & Environment), USA bobashworth@earthlink.net

Norm Kalmanovitch Geophysicist, Canada, kalhnd@shaw.ca

Jim Peden Atmospheric Physicist (Ret.), USA peden@middlebury.net

Hans Schreuder Analytical Chemist (Ret.), UK hans@tech-know.eu

NOTES and REFERENCES

A) IPCC Summary for Policymakers (Fig SPM1 on page 4 fails to include temperature data alongside CO2 estimates over the last 4,000 years or more): http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm.pdf. The Full report (via http://www.ipcc.ch/) similarly fails to include the available data required.

B) Greenland Ice data http://www.acia.uaf.edu/PDFs/ACIA_Science_Chapters_Final/ACIA_Ch02_Final.pdf page 49.

C) CO2 is a gas and diffuses through many centuries of ice layers when absorbed hence rapid ‘spike’ changes in CO2 in recent decades will be smudged out to small blips in 1,000 years time. Past peaks are also smudged out and invisible now.

Stomatal pore data from geological studies shows that there have been sharp peaks in CO2 concentrations in the past

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/20_1-2_CO2_Scandal.pdf page 6 of pdf;

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/284/5422/1971

http://www.oilcrisis.com/LaHerrere/climatechange200704.pdf p10 and p12.

D) Leaving aside the question as to whether warming is really a problem in the first place – the Bronze Age having been described as the ‘Climate Optimum’ of the period since the last ice age (the ‘Holocene’).

E) UN CAPSA site – http://www.uncapsa.org/Topics/IPCC_letter_14April08-1.pdf

Copy of Letter 14 April UN CAPSA site Letter 14th April

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

Etiketter: , , , , , ,

3 svar to “The IPCC must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices!”

  1. BeRKA Says:

    Svend Hendriksen är INTE nobelpristagare 1998.

    De två första namnen är kända klimatförnekare, och jag antar att resten inklusive Svend är påhittade, eller?🙄

  2. S.E.Hendriksen Says:

    @BeRKA

    Du har ret…jeg var ikke medmodtager i 1998, men i 1988, året hvor IPCC blev navngivet.

    Med venlig hilsen
    P.O.Box 1004
    S.E.Hendriksen
    3910 Kangerlussuaq
    Greenland

  3. Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 291 « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] The IPCC must be called to account and cease its deceptive practices! […]

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


%d bloggare gillar detta: