Archive for maj, 2009

The Best way to reduce CO2 emissions? – Civil War, Dictators, Political oppression and TOTAL poverty for the people!

24 maj, 2009

Here are some interesting statistics about CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2006.

I am going to show you the 10 “Best” and “Worst” per capita CO2 emissions. And the ones who are increasing and decreasing most.

Plus the top ones in total emissions.

So if the Global Warming Hysterics want to succeed the formula is very simple:

Start civil wars, Support dictators, Oppress ALL political freedoms and rights, and keep the people in TOTAL poverty.

Then, AND ONLY THEN, will you succeed in reducing mankind to enough poverty and slavery to be able to succeed in this “worthy” goal to reduce the CO2 in the atmosphere.

They, the Dictators, are great at reducing EVERYTHING, including CO2 emissions.

And the “best” way to stop the “worst” emitters per capita is to sink all these islands/coastal cities that are so good at spreading the CO2. So all Global Warming Hysterics should “welcome” the rise of sea levels (which is NOT happening).

Notice that all the “best” countries isn’t exactly the ‘Ten Best Places you Want to Live” either to put it middle.

And all this for reducing a gas (CO2) that is around 0,8-0,9% of the Earths atmosphere. And where the humans are responsible for around 3% of that 0,8-0,9%.

So we are talking about 0,03%.

Isn’t that a worthy goal for our politicians to sacrifice our freedom, wealth and economic living standard and spend trillions of dollars to “fight” this PREDICTED rise of temperature by the computer models. And they are also gladly willing to sacrifice the developing countries in the process.

Se also my posts:

This is what the Global Warming Hysteria is all about – 0,03%!,

The 800 year lag of carbon compared to temperature

50 Years of CO2 monitoring: Can you see the increase???

The wonderful benefits of CO2!,

När CO2 var som störst var temperaturen som lägst!

A CO2 graph that says it all!

Svenska folket – Ni har blivit grundlurade! 500 miljoner år av CO2 data

Climate Change – is CO2 The Cause?

EU:s CO2 policy – The hot air of hypocrisy!

“Sustainability” and Carbon Taxes runs amok in my town

Poland applies EU climate brakes – the French Presidency is only looking out for itself (as usual)

Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’

Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’- 2

Sea Level Rise in excess of 2 meters is physically untenable during the next 100 years

Havsnivån har SJUNKIT med 170 m de senaste 80 miljoner åren!

Havsnivån har SJUNKIT med 170 m de senaste 80 miljoner åren – 2!,

 

Data per capita here:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tableh1cco2.xls

Total data here:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tableh1co2.xls

The Top 10 “Best”per capita growth of CO2 in Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide 

1. Chad  0,02
2. Afghanistan  0,03
3. Congo (Kinshasa)  0,04
4, Burundi  0,05
5. Cambodia  005
6. Uganda  0,06
7. Mali  0,06
8. Ethiopia  0,07
9. Malawi  0,07
10. Burkina faso  0,07

The Top 10 “Worst”per capita growth of CO2 in Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide

1. Gibraltar  160,22
2. Virgin Islands  118,30
3. Qatar  61,19
4, Netherlands Antilles  49,13
5. Trinidad and Tobago  44,32
6. Bahrain  38,44
7. United Arab Emirates  35,05
8. Singapore  31,41
9. Kuwait  30,92
10. Brunei  26,89

The Top Seven with greatest fall in CO2 emissions:

1. Afghanistan
2. Congo (Kinshasa)
3. Guam
4. Eritrea
5. Gabon
6. Kyrgyzstan
7. Zimbabwe

Among the worst offenders:

1. Maldives
2. Mauritius
3. Seychelles

And most of the other nice islands we dream of ranks around here on the list.

The Top four with greatest total CO2 emissions 2006 in Million Metric Tons of CO2

1. China  6017,69
2. USA 5902,75
3. Russia  1704,36
4. India  1293,17

China has gone from 2966,52 in year 2000 to 6017,69 in year 2006.  AN INCREASE OF 103% IN 6 YEARS!

And they don’t HAVE TO DO ANYTHING ACCORDING TO THE KYOTO AGREMENT. INDIA DON’T HAVE TO DO ANYTHING EITHER.

 USA, not a signatory either, did much “better” than most European states.  Which is intresting when you think of the “hostile” propaganda from EU agianst USA, especially during the Bush years.

The Top four with lowest total CO2 emissions 2006 in Million Metric Tons of CO2

1. Niue  0,005
2. Saint Helena  0,01
3. Turks and Caicos Islands  0,01
4. Kiibati  0,01

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>

varning-2

Annonser

The Origin and Life Cycle of Junk Science – OR Global Warming Hysteria

23 maj, 2009

Below is a very good description of the cycle and the forces behind any mass hysteria and junk science.

If you go through all my posts in this blog you are going to find eminent examples of all these different stages of the Global Warming Hysteria.

I all along have said that this Global Warming Hysteria has nothing to do with science, facts, or saving the environment. It’s all a political agenda. An anti human, anti development and anti freedom agenda. They also hate the capitalistic system for obvious reasons.

And that the politicians love this Global Warming Hysteria because they can tax everyone to death, and introduce new fees etc with the “motivation” that “they” are “saving” the planet from the Global Warming treat.

Of course they don’t sacrifice anything themselves- se the glaring example of Al Gore who preaches frugality to the masses while he himself gladly continues with his great and energy rich lifestyle – they ONLY LIKE YOU TO FEEL THE PAIN and BURDEN of this sacrifice.

The sad part about this Hysteria is, besides the scientists how have betrayed everything that science should stand for, is the press and medias role in censoring and intimidating everyone who has opposed this hysteria.

And there willing participation in driving and promoting this hysteria. Not to mention their part in covering up the Giant Difference between what these high priests says and what they actually do. A total and utter shame for what journalism should be about.

These people – Global Warming Alarmists – TOTALLY without any sense of proportions, priorities and what is important for the survival of the human race and the Earth – We have entrusted to rule our countries?

As I wrote in my post on 23 may, 2008  ”Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism:

And when you are at it – the rest of the World too.

This is happening HERE AND NOW. People are being burnt alive and hacked to pieces. Gruesome? You bet! Horrible – yes. But desperate people do sometimes do desperate things.

Do you think the Nobel Price winners IPCC, Al Gore and the rest of the Global Warming Hysterics pack care?   Nah…they are very busy spending trillions upon trillions of dollars of your tax money on something much, much more important than saving lives here and now.

Namely, they are “fighting” something that MIGHT HAPPEN (IF the climate models are right – which they are not, se my previous posts) IN 100 years – a temperature rise of 2-4 F.

Wow! That’s a worthy goal isn’t. I mean how cares about people killing themselves, dying of starvation or some “obscure” disease that take tens of thousand of lives a year here and now. And you don’t need computer models to figure that out either – you just have to go out on the streets.

There’s to much population anyway – they are actually saying that. When you instead can “fight” the great enemy CO2 lurking in a distant future.

All of this is led by the holly church of IPCC and it’s chief priest (and saint) Al Gore. Who is constantly spreading the message of near Gloom and Doom if we do not obey him and his church. And if you question this superstition you are immediately excommunicated and shunned.

And ALL the politicians and news media are worshiping and prostrating before their altar of carbon trading. Obediently following every whim and decree from the high church.

The problem is that the priesthood of Global Warming Hysterics are not exactly living as they preach. On the contrary – they live a very luxurious life and DO ALL THE THINGS that they preach and say the common man should not do.

Seems like fair and righteous deal doesn’t it? We do ALL the hard work and ALL the sacrifices and they take ALL our money.

At the same time as they are spending enormous sums of your tax money on their VERY important (except for themselves) nonsense mission. They do not forget to tell you ALL the time what a great burden they have so we should understand how REALLY important these people are. And what an important function THEY play in saving the planet. And how grateful we the people should be for that.

And that they can not be disturbed fulfilling this important mission by such trivial matters as people dying of starvation or curable diseases and civil wars etc.

But this is not a problem (that they are not living as they preach ) since news papers and TV are very obedient and loyally preach the message and sings the Gospel. And has since long forgotten what it meant to be a journalist. Or a politician in service of the public.

This my friends is the sad state of the “civilized” world today. If you didn’t know otherwise you would think this is some scene from medieval times with it’s pagan rituals and worship. And with the letters of indulgence (carbon credits) paying for our carbon sins and repenting to Kyoto.

And I hold all politicians and so called scientists and so called journalists accountable for this sorry state of affairs because they took ACTIVE part in it and promoted it. And they did ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO STOPP this madness for all these years.

This is the dream world according to IPCC, Al Gore and all Global Warming Hysterics: (se the pictures in my post  Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism,)

We in the industrialized world would be reduced to subservient living. And the developing world efforts to give it’s citizens a decent living standard would be stopped in it’s tracks and they would be reduced to mass poverty.

Lo and behold isn’t that a worthy goal!. You toil and work hard to reduce your own AND everybody else’s living standard. Yeah that’s a motivator all right!

See the picture before you – mom and dad is proudly telling their children that they are working VERY, VERY HARD to REDUCE their own living standard, their children’s and the grandchildren’s.

We would be the first generation IN HISTORY who on purpose and willingly reduce our economic, social and living standard. AND FORCE the rest of the world to do the same regardless of WHAT THEY WANT!

This global mass madness is led by politicians, newspapers/TV and so called scientists. Because they are blindly following some computer models that cannot predict even the weather two weeks from now! Or accurately simulate how the weather was two weeks ago!

All in the name of reducing the increase of global temperature 2-4 F in 100 years.

And this is the same Earth how have survived drastic shifts (often in very short time spans) in climate and weather through is long history.

On a DAILY basis the temperature can easily vary 80 F in the same location. And the difference between the warmest and coldest spot on earth THE SAME DAY can vary 220 F (Vostok and Death Valley averages). And this we have survived (and worse) without problems for centuries.

And the difference between the record coldest -129 F (the Vostok Station in Antarctica on July 21, 1983) and the record warmest 136 F (El Azizia, Libya on Sept. 13, 1922) is a whopping 265 F!

Or take the state of Montana where the difference between the record warmest and coldest is an impressive 187 F. And the people of Montana are still there and thriving.

And somehow the earth managed to survive that. But a minuscule predicted increase of 2-4 F in 100 years is supposed to mean total disaster for our civilization! And such a catastrophe that the politicians and scientist are going to sacrifice all of our wealth and living standards.

Isn’t it fantastic how suddenly the human race have become very, very fragile. We can somehow survive an 80 F variation in temperature during one day. But a predicted 2-4 F increase in 100 years we cannot handle according to the Global Warming Hysterics.

To give you just one example of how absurd this whole Global Warming Hysteria is:

Here in Stockholm the temperature recently DROPPED 38 F in a matter of 10-11 hours (Yeah that’s right! It dropped 10 -18 times more in 10 hours than the predicted rise in 100 years). But there was NO emergency meeting of the cabinet or extra session of the parliament or huge headlines in the news papers to “deal” with this “emergency”. Why?

Because nothing happened. Every one, including the cabinet, parliament and news media, went about their lives as normal as nothing had happened. It was colder of course but that’s about it.

Isn’t it strange that a drop in temperature 10 -18 times stronger in 10 hours than the predicted rise in temperature in 100 years, and no one reacts because it’s considered “normal” weather and demands no action ? And yet the same governments get hysteric about the PREDICTED 2-4 F rise in 100 years by the computer models?

And they are willing to sacrifice our wealth and economic living standard and spend trillions of dollars to “fight” this predicted rise of temperature by the computer models. And they are also willing to sacrifice the developing countries in the process.

These people – TOTALLY without any sense of proportions, priorities and what is important for the survival of the human race and the Earth – We have entrusted to rule our countries?

Here are just a few posts:

Polish Academy of Sciences position on the Global Warming Hysteria

Global Warming Hysteria – It’s all about the money, YOUR money

Global Warming Hysterics – the closed-minded dogmatism of a religious zealot

Why should anyone believe The Global Warming Hysterics?

Rise of sea levels is ‘the greatest lie ever told’

If ALL human activities CEASED in Alaska TODAY the effect on global temperature in 2100 would be 0,001 C

The UN Climate Change Numbers Hoax eller IPCC:s lögn!

The Unscientific way of IPCC:s forecasts eller IPPC:s lögn del 2!

Peer Review – What it actually means

Peer Review – What it actually means 2

Assessment of the reliability of climate predictions based on comparisons with historical time series

Has the IPCC inflated the feedback factor?

Rewriting Temperature History – Time and Time Again! 

IPCC Review Editors – “No Working Papers”, “No Correspondence” are kept!

20, 000 year of Temperature, CO2 and sea level change data

Al Gore, James Hansen – Carbon Communists

Why greens don’t want to ‘solve’ climate change

The environmentalists want to change us and our behaviour – Their ambition is to control and manipulate us

Environmentalism is a Bigger Threat to Humanity than Global Warming and what is endangered is freedom and prosperity

CLIMATE MODELS FOR MONKEYS

Global Warming Hysterics – Get out of Africa Now! Or The curse of environmentalism

They are the worst sort of people to put in charge of anything – ignorant, arrogant, self-righteous, often hypocritical.

THE ENVIRONMENTALIST CREED – Anti human, anti scientific, anti technology!

The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate change

Clearing out the environmental fog

World’s Scariest Words: ‘I’m an Environmentalist and I’m Here to Help’

 

http://dailydollop.blogspot.com/2007/06/life-cycle-of-junk-science.html

Life Cycle of Junk Science

Below is the life cycle of junk science, as best I can figure it by analyzing the history of classic junk science, from diet pills to The Population Bomb. Can you think of any examples today that might fit this life cycle?

Genesis

1) Maverick Scientist has an Idea.

2) Other scientists deride the Idea.

3) SF Writers use Idea as image of bleak future.

4) Academics debate Idea.

5) Politicians begins to discuss the Idea, but don’t understand it.

6) General Public ignores the Idea.

Growth

7) Champion arrives to actively promote and publicize Idea.

8 ) Scientists form a consensus that agrees with Idea.

9) Academics teach Idea as fact.

10) Fast Adapters change lifestyle, ridicule General Public.

11) Hollywood makes disaster movie, sometimes based on SF novel from 3.

12) General Public makes token lifestyle changes.

13) Politicians use Idea to attack political enemies.

Hysteria

14) Scientific consensus begins ruthlessly crushing dissent.

15) Champion is hailed as Messianic Leader.

16) Academics announce society is doomed.

17) General public accepts Idea.

18) Opponents of Idea are cast as wicked and immoral.

19) Music Industry holds benefit, sometimes using film name from 11.

 Critical Mass

20) Dissenting Scientist proposes alternative theory to Idea.

21) Scientific consensus denounces Dissenting Scientist.

22) Messianic Leader begins making ludicrous claims unrelated to Idea.

23) Politicians propose massive social, fiscal, and moral changes to accommodate Idea.

24) Time Magazine puts Maverick Scientist, Messiah, Idea, or all 3 on cover.

Death and Rebirth

25) Dissenting Scientist is proven to be right, nothing happens.

26) Scientists form new consensus, claim they knew all along.

27) Fast Adapters are ridiculed by General Public.

28) Academics continue to teach Idea as “compelling theory”.

29) Politicians raise taxes, just in case.

30) Messiah and Entertainment Industry find new Maverick Scientist.

31) Return to Step 1.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>

varning-2

EU – The aim of this treaty is to be unreadable and unclear AND it can not be understood by ordinary citizens

23 maj, 2009

Som ett komplement till mitt inlägg EU – The inner game and the Corruption that Cost £684 931,5 per hour EVERY hour EVERY day EVERY year. And is increasing. så här inför EU valet, kommer här några officiella citat från de som var direkt inblandade i Lissabon fördraget. (Det finns mycket mer).

Som på ett glasklart sätt visar vad det handlar om. Och hur MEDVETET detta falskspel är.

Där den politiska eliten i Europa AVSIKTLIGT konstruerade Lissabon fördraget så att vanligt folk INTE skall förstå och märka vad som är på gång.

EU ’är ju gubevars ett ”demokrati och fredsprojekt” i den officiella retoriken. När det i själva verket handlar om den största makt överflyttningen i Europas historia från folket och lokala parlament till EU byråkratin. Som är utformat efter den franska byråkratiska modellen som den såg ut på 50 talet. Med en oerhört hierarkisk och centralstyrd förvaltning som inte behöver motivera eller redovisa någonting inför medborgarna.

Och som vanligt har massmedia och våra politiker fullständigt svikit i denna fråga. Det har i och för sig funnits enstaka artiklar i pressen, och enstaka politiker som har beskrivit SMÅ DELAR av detta. Men de är skrivna på ”EU byråkratiska så ingen vanlig människa förstår vad det egentligen handlar om.

Jean Claude Juncker – Prime Minister of Luxembourg

”Britain is different. Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?

There is a single legal personality for the EU, the primacy of European law, a new architecture for foreign and security policy, there is an enormous extension in the fields of the EU’s powers,”

– Daily Telegraph 3 July 2007

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1556400/Dont-tell-British-about-the-EU-treaty.html

Karel de Gucht, Belgian Foreign Minister

“The aim of the Constitutional treaty was to be more readable; the aim of this treaty is to be unreadable…The Constitution aimed to be clear, whereas this treaty had to be unclear. It is a success.”

– Flandreinfo, 23 June 2007.

Jean-Luc Dehaene,  former Belgian prime minister, and former Vice President of the Convention which wrote the EU Constitution

The Economist of 9 August 2007 quoted some revealing remarks by Jean-Luc Dehaene. The Economist said that in an interview in Le Soir, he said it was “dangerous talk” to want “too much transparency and clarity” in the EU. On 17 October 2007 European Voice quoted him as saying, “The paper [the Reform Treaty] is incomprehensible. Good! We need incomprehensible papers if we are to make progress . . . We have to be realistic.”

http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9619050

Giuliano Amato, former Italian Prime Minister and the other former Vice President of the Convention which wrote the EU Constitution.

He said, at a meeting of the Centre for European Reform, recorded by Open Europe, on 12 July 2007 that EU leaders “decided that the document should be unreadable. If it is unreadable, it is not constitutional, that was the sort of perception… . In order to make our citizens happy, to produce a document that they will never understand! But, there is some truth [in it]... any Prime Minister – imagine the UK Prime Minister – can go to the Commons and say ‘Look, you see, it’s absolutely unreadable, it’s the typical Brussels treaty, nothing new, no need for a referendum’ Should you succeed in understanding it at first sight there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new..”

The good thing about not calling it a Constitution is that no one can ask for a referendum on it.” – 21 February 2007.

Valerie Giscard d’Estaing, former president of France and president of the Convention which wrote the EU Constitution

Writing in Le Monde on 14 June 2007, a few days before the form of the “reform” proposals had been settled: ”A last good idea consists of wanting to preserve part of the Constitution and camouflaging this by distributing it among several texts. The more innovative provisions [of the Constitution] would be simple amendments to the Nice and Maastricht treaties. The technical improvements would be gathered together in a bland and uncontroversial treaty. These texts would be put to Parliaments to vote on them one at a time. Thus public opinion would be led to accept, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly….All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way.”

http://www.lemonde.fr/cgi-bin/ACHATS/acheter.cgi?offre=ARCHIVES&type_item=ART_ARCH_30J&objet_id=993865&clef=ARC-TRK-D_01

On 26 October 2007, writing again in Le Monde he said, “The Lisbon Treaty itself cannot be understood by ordinary citizens since it can be understood only by also reading the treaties which it amends. . . The institutional proposals of the constitutional treaty – the only things which mattered for the members of the European Convention – are in the Lisbon treaty in their entirety but in a different order and inserted into previous treaties. – What is the purpose of this subtle manoeuvre? First and above all to escape from the constraint of having to hold a referendum by dispersing the articles and by renouncing the constitutional vocabulary.”

http://www.lemonde.fr/opinions/article/2007/10/26/la-boite-a-outils-du-traite-de-lisbonne-par-valery-giscard-d-estaing_971616_3232.html

Dr Garret FitzGerald, former Irish Prime Minister

”The most striking change (between the EU Constitution in its older and newer version ) is perhaps that in order to enable some governments to reassure their electorates that the changes will have no constitutional implications, the idea of a new and simpler treaty containing all the provisions governing the Union has now been dropped in favour of a huge series of individual amendments to two existing treaties. Virtual incomprehensibility has thus replaced simplicity as the key approach to EU reform. As for the changes now proposed to be made to the constitutional treaty, most are presentational changes that have no practical effect. They have simply been designed to enable certain heads of government to sell to their people the idea of ratification by parliamentary action rather than by referendum.” – Irish Times, 30 June 2007.

Angela Merkel, current Chancellor of Germany and president of the EU from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2007

We have renounced everything that makes people think of a state.” Gone are the words, constitution, flag, anthem and motto.

Speaking to the European Parliament, on 27 June, Angela Merkel was keen to point out, “The agreement reached in Brussels [23 June 2007] enables us to retain the substance of the Constitutional Treaty. ”  “At the same time, the Reform Treaty contains major advances for the European Union’s capacity to act. Indeed, in some areas we even went further than in the Constitutional Treaty.”

“European integration has to be striven for and consolidated time and again.”

http://www.eu2007.de/en/News/Speeches_Interviews/Juni/0628BKinEP.html

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om =”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>

varning-2

Välkommen till Stasi och KGB land DAG 135 – IPRED och en Upphovs- och Copyrightlagstiftning som har blivit absurd för konsumenterna

15 maj, 2009

Tyvärr så gäller fortfarande denna varning dag 135 och eländet fortsätter:

varning-2

Från och med 00:00:01 den 1 januari 2009 så lever vi i ett land med en TOTAL OFFICIELL MASSAVLYSNING a la Stasi och KGB.

Tack vare våra intälägänta politiker som har, i brott mot grundlagen, sålt ut allt vad fri- och rättigheter, och rättssäkerhet heter.

Och vansinnet fortsätter! Och verkar snarast ÖKA I TAKT! Datalagringsdirektiv, Telekompaket, ACTA, IPRED, IPRED2, FRA1 och FRA 2, Remote Searching ,  Polismetodutredningen etc.

”Bonniers avtal låser författare på livstid, och författarens arvingar ytterligare en livstid.”

”Bonniers utnyttjar sin dominerande position för att få avtal som ger dem rätt att sitta på författares texter utan att faktiskt göra något. Böcker låses in i upp till tre år utan att författaren får en enda krona.”

”På det här sättet drar Bonniers med sig hela bokbranschen i samma träsk som nästan tagit kål på musikbranschen.”

Ett mycket illustrativt exempel på IPRED lagens totala vansinne och dess förödande effekter. Det är alltså dessa affärsintressen regeringen har gett större befogenheter än polisen och offrat våra fri- och rättigheter samt vår rättssäkerhet för.

Så att privata affärsintressen kan låsa in vår kultur i TVÅ livstider. Och stämma skiten ur och HOTA vanliga familjer så att de kan sitta på denna kultur utan att behöva GÖRA NÅGONTING!

Tack för det Sveriges riksdag och regeringen!

Som istället för att inse den unika möjligheten att för första gången i mänsklighetens historia göra kunskap och information åtkomlig och lättillgänglig här och nu ÖVER HELA VÄRLDEN för ALLA “instantly”, istället gör ALLT för att begränsa denna frihet och att upprätthålla några få, stora bolags förlegade och teknik/konsument fientliga affärsmodeller.

Se där ett värdigt mål att offra alla medborgares fri- och rättigheter samt vår rättssäkerhet för!

Som sagt, vi har ”värdiga” representanter i regeringen och riksdagen som ”verkligen” tillvaratar svenska folkets intressen.  Om 4 veckor är det val till EU parlamentet (se mitt inlägg EU – The inner game and the Corruption that Cost £684 931,5 per hour EVERY hour EVERY day EVERY year. And is increasing.). Då blir det ett utmärkt tillfälle att påminna dessa arroganta makthavare som har gjort allt för att inskränka våra fri- och rättigheter och vår rättssäkerhet i brott mot grundlagen,  om att det FORTFARANDE faktiskt är folket som röstar  och FORTFARANDE avgör vilka partier som kommer in.

Som det står i regeringsformens första kapitel första paragrafen: ”All offentlig makt i Sverige utgår från folket. Den svenska folkstyrelsen bygger på fri åsiktsbildning…” och ” Den offentliga makten utövas under lagarna.”

http://www.riksdagen.se/templates/R_PageExtended____6055.aspx

Jo vi har märkt det!

Det är dags att folket tar tillbaks denna makt och påminner vår politiska maktelit om att detta enkla förhållande FORTFARANDE FAKTISKT GÄLLER.

Se även mina inlägg:

Välkommen till Stasi och KGB land DAG 109 – IPRED och en Upphovs- och Copyrightlagstiftning som har blivit absurd för konsumenterna

Välkommen till Stasi och KGB land DAG 110 – Nu får det vara nog!

Välkommen till Stasi och KGB land DAG 110 – Nu får det vara nog! – 2

Artikeln här:

http://www.dn.se/kultur-noje/debatt-essa/mats-soderlund-googles-avtal-battre-an-bonniers-1.866727

Mats Söderlund: Googles avtal bättre än Bonniers

Öm Bonnier-tå. Google erbjuder författarna avsevärt högre ersättning. Det skriver Sveriges författarförbunds ordförande Mats Söderlund i ett debattinlägg.

Bonnierförlagen nobbar Googleavtalet, meddelar deras jurist Dag Wetterberg i Dagens Nyheter (8/5 – läs här). De vill ha ett eget avtal, tycker att de fått för lite betalt och jämför plötsligt USA med Kina. Dessutom oroar de sig för att Googles affärsidé inte håller.

Men samtidigt som Bonniers vill förhandla själva med Google nekar de sina egna författare samma rättighet: ”De författare som inte anpassar sig till villkoren kan söka andra förlag” (Svensk Bokhandel 7/09).

Jag gissar att Bonniers ilska bottnar i att Google satt fingret på en öm punkt. Av de 60 000 titlar Dag Wetterberg talar om tillhör en majoritet författarna och Bonniers har låg eller ingen ersättning alls att hämta där.

När de nu lanserar egna e-boksavtal är villkoren betydligt sämre än Googles. En enkel jämförelse:

Googles avtal är inte exklusivt, författaren behåller rätten att göra vad man vill med sina texter. Bonniers kräver ensamrätt.

Författaren kan när som helst begära att Google plockar bort hans eller hennes böcker. Bonniers avtal låser författare på livstid, och författarens arvingar ytterligare en livstid. Google ger författaren 63 procent av intäkterna. Bonniers ”erbjuder” 24 procent.

Sveriges Författarförbund ser inget skäl att avråda sina medlemmar att ingå i förlikningen med Google men uppmanar dem att inte skriva på Bonnieravtalet. Bonniers utnyttjar sin dominerande position för att få avtal som ger dem rätt att sitta på författares texter utan att faktiskt göra något. Böcker låses in i upp till tre år utan att författaren får en enda krona. SFF vill se en bred branschöverenskommelse som ger läsare tillgång till litteraturskatten och alla parter en rimlig ersättning, även förläggarna där de har legitima intressen.

På det här sättet drar Bonniers med sig hela bokbranschen i samma träsk som nästan tagit kål på musikbranschen.

Mats Söderlund

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>,<a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fra” rel=”tag”>fra</a>

Vindkraften som en mycket, mycket dyr bergochdalbana med liten effekt – 14

14 maj, 2009

Som ett komplement till mitt inlägg Vindkraften som en mycket, mycket dyr bergochdalbana med liten effekt – 13  kommer här mera aktuell driftstatistik från de svenska vindkraftverken från de senaste 30 dagarna.

2009-05-14_230041

De senaste dagarna så ha det varit väldigt gynnsammt ”väder” för vindkraften med ihållande vindar på 5-12 m/s i stort sett i hela landet.

Trotts dessa IDEALA omständigheter så är den SAMLADE EFFEKTEN FRÅN DE SVENSKA VINDKRAFTVERKEN IDAG 6 %.

Jäpp, HELA 6% trotts IDEALA OMSTÄNDIGHETER.

Och är det INTE FANTASTISKT MED DESSA OTROLIGA STORA VARIATIONER UPP OCH NER!

Den 10/5 så var produktionen DRYGT 7100 MWh per dygn. 1, jag säger 1 dag senare så var den drygt 2500 MWh per dygn!

EN MINSKNING AV PRODUKTIONEN PÅ DRYGT 65 %! PÅ 1 DAG!

Och en MINSKNING på drygt 79 % på 3 dagar (10-13/5)

Och detta är ju på inget sätt uniktTvärtom!

Är det inte fantastiskt att det är detta MYCKET DYRA, OSÄKRA och MYCKET SUBVENTIONERADE energislag som skall “rädda” vår energiförsörjning.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6“ rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

varning-2

EU – The inner game and the Corruption that Cost £684 931,5 per hour EVERY hour EVERY day EVERY year. And is increasing.

6 maj, 2009

Så här inför EU valet tänkte jag bidra med lite godbitar om hur det egentligen går till i Europaparlamentet och Europa byråkratin.

Och det har INGENTING att göra med det officiella trams som sprids av våra ministrar och politiker.

Nu senast så har vi ju sett ett mycket illustrativt exempel på hur det går till när det gäller Telekompaketet. Där Europarlamentet i flera omgångar röstat för att inför vissa rättsäkerhetsgarantier och vissa garantier för Internetanvändningen (tillägg 138/46 och 166).

Men där rådet och kommissionen genom trixande och manipulation (ex. röst dagordningen) ser till att det till slut blir som de och Frankrike ville från första början.

Läs här om en del av allt detta fulspel:

http://mp.se/templates/Mct_78.aspx?avdnr=11913&number=169376

http://henrikalexandersson.blogspot.com/2009/05/telekompaketet-helvetes-javla-skit.html

http://henrikalexandersson.blogspot.com/2009/05/telekompaketet-citizens-rights.html

http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=334&Itemid=9

http://www.laquadrature.net/en/telecoms-package-when-rapporteurs-betray-eu-citizens

http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=333&Itemid=9

http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=332&Itemid=9

http://www.erikjosefsson.eu/blogg/2009/04/26/faerdigfoerpackat-internet-packat-och-klart

http://www.fjellner.eu/langre-uppdatering-om-telekompaketet/

http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/victory-for-eu-citizens-amendement-138-was-voted-again

http://www.laquadrature.net/lawtracks/telecoms_package/

http://werebuild.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

http://henrikalexandersson.blogspot.com/2009/05/fragor-om-telekompaketet-till.html

http://scabernestor.blogg.se/2009/may/regeringen-far-med-osanningar-lawful-content.html

Så vad Europas folk och europaparlamentet tycker spelar inte så stor roll. I slutändan är det kommissionen och vissa länder som bestämmer hur det blir (i det här fallet Frankrike).

Det är alltså DETTA GÄNG som regeringen vill ge MERA makt genom Lissabonfördraget.

Det är därför det är SÅDAN ENORM PRESS på Irland att de måste rösta IGEN eftersom folket ”röstade FEL”. På samma sätt som folket i Frankrike, Nederländerna och Danmark tidigare ”röstade FEL”.

På samma sätt som man tvingade Irland att rösta en gång till och ”rösta rätt” efter att folket sagt NEJ till Nice fördraget juni 2001.

Inte för att en ny omröstningen egentligen spelar en så stor roll annat än politiskt. Då EU i det tysta (mycket medvetet) är i full färd med att införa alla dessa ändringar enligt Lissabonfördraget. Som alltså INTE skulle kunna införas om något land sa NEJ. Allt enligt fördraget och vad ALLA regerings chefer sa vid undertecknandet.

”Problemet” var ju Irland där MAN MÅSTE folkomrösta när det gäller viktigare förändringar i konstitutionen (artikel 46). I alla andra EU länder  behöver man inte ta en sådan hänsyn till folkviljan utan där kan politikerna glatt bestämma själva oavsett vad medborgarna tycker.

Visst är det skönt med representativ demokrati där folket får sin vilja igenom.

Se även mina inlägg

Välkommen till Stasi och KGB land DAG 110 – Nu får det vara nog! – 2

Speech of the President Václav Klaus in the European Parliament

Sverige talar om för Världen hur den borde styras

Och min kommentar: https://uddebatt.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/valkommen-till-stasi-och-kgb-land-dag-110-%e2%80%93-nu-far-det-vara-nog-2/#comment-5190

”Vi är många som har fått nog!

Det finns enstaka undantag bland de svenska europarlamentarikerna som gör ett bra arbete därnere. Men det spelar liksom ingen roll i det stora hela. Då det är partiledningar här hemma och partigrupperna därnere som verkligen bestämmer när det verkligen gäller.

Och röstsiffrorna visar just detta.

När sossar, moderater, folkpartister, Kd röstar lika i 89-91% av fallen.

Och när konservativa, liberala och socialdemokratiska ledamöter i 97 procent av alla EU-parlamentets slutomröstningar är överens.

Vad skall vi DÅ med dessa partier till? Och vad tog deras ideologier och partiprogram vägen? Och vad är det för ”parlament” där så officiellt ”motstridiga” ideologier är SÅ eniga

Det påminner lite grann om Nordkorea. Men där är man ju till 99,98% överens

Till detta tillkommer sedan detta intressanta fenomen att man i Bryssel röstar igenom saker som man officiellt i Sverige sagt att man inte stöder. Och som är 180 grader ifrån vad man säger i valmanifest och partiprogram.

Etc. Etc.”

Artikel on EU parlamentarikernas löner och alla förmåner:

http://www.dn.se/fordjupning/europa2009/parlamentarikerna-far-chockhojd-lon-1.849544

Parlamentarikerna får chockhöjd lön

Efter valet får EU-parlamentarikerna höjd lön med 49 procent, från 54.500 kronor i månaden till cirka 81.000 kronor (7.400 euro).

Men parlamentarikerna har också förmåner värda flera miljoner kronor per år:

Pengar för att anställa en eller flera assistenter (max 2,3 miljoner kronor per år).

Traktamente, exempelvis när parlamentet sammanträder (3.278 kronor per dag).

Ersättning för ”allmänna utgifter” (drygt 550.000 kronor per år. Halva denna ersättning fortsätter att betalas tre månader efter mandattiden.)

Reseersättning för deltagande i parlamentets arbete. (Inget maxbelopp).

Reseersättning för arbetsresor i länder utanför Sverige (max 45.600 kr per år).

Ersättning för språk- och datakurser (max 55.000 kr).

Olycksfallsförsäkring (täcker läkarkostnader upp till 82.500 kronor per tillfälle).

Livförsäkring (faller ut vid dödsfall eller vid 60 års ålder, om man suttit minst tio år som ledamot).

Ålderspension: För varje år som parlamentariker får man 3,5 procent av lönen i pension från 63 års ålder (max pension är 70 procent av lönen).

Siffrorna bygger på en eurokurs på 11 kronor.

DN

How many times does the voters have to vote NO before NO is really a NO? Or what part of NO! don’t you understand?

Nigel Farage on who’s who in the EU commission – Interesting “gang” wouldn’t you say:

– Jailed for embezzlement and banned from holding public office for 2 years

– Old communist apparatchik

– Another old communist apparatchik convicted for providing false information and he is in charge of the EU’s (SIC!) Audit and Anti Fraud unit

– Accused of lying to the European Parliament by auditor

– 20 of the commissionaires has said that they intend to IMPLEMENT the constitution EVEN before it is ratified

Expense Allowance Abuse by MEP

€URO-MP Millions Hit the Jackpot with EU

Daniel Hannan MEP: EU double standards on Tibet & Lisbon

On the day before the EU constitution was signed in Lisbon the resistance in Strasbourg demands a referendum across Europe.

As Italian interior minister, Giuliano Amato said at the London School of Economics last February, ”The good thing about not calling it a constitution is that no one can ask for a referendum.

EU Nationalism where you never ever take NO for an answer

Budget Busters!  The auditors have refused to sign off the accounts for 11 years in a row

Kafkesque EU Parliament: Corbett’s Report

European Parliament, Strasbourg, 7 & 9 July 2008. Richard Corbett MEP (PES) presents the Report on the amendments to the rules on the formation of political groups in the European Parliament. The report had not passed the Committee stage, but was nonetheless brought to plenary with ”compromise” amendments and adopted.

END OF NATIONS – EU Takeover & the Lisbon Treaty  – The Chicken Run in the EU Parliament

The constitution gives EU the ability to amend ITSELF in the future without having to refer to more intergovernmental conferences. It gives EU the ability to legislate over literally every single aspect of our lives.

Thos how oppose this treaty are mentally ill

The EU has become a racket

EU Hypocrisy on Climate Change

The EU and the Myth of Consensus on Climate Change

MEP Exposes The EU Lisbon Treaty!!!

They decided in the council that it’s not allowed FOR ANY institution in the European Union to print a consolidated version THAT CAN BE READ before it has been approved in ALL 27 member states

Van Buitenen’s final battle against EU corruption?

Irregularities in OLAF

The real face of European Union 1/6

The real face of European Union 2/6

The real face of European Union 3/6

The real face of European Union 4/6

“MEP sometimes vote up to 450 times in 80 minutes. I don’t know what is going on half the time. The civil servants draw up the list and if it’s vote nr 58 and the paper says vote YES you vote yes. And if it’s vote nr 59 and the paper says vote NO you vote no. It’s an absolute farce! It is a complete shame masquerading as democracy.”

The scrapping of trial by jury

The scrapping of Habeas Corpus

-The scrapping of innocent until proven guilty

-The scrapping of double jeopardy

-The scrapping of non disclosure

The real face of European Union 5/6

The cost to Britain is 1,3 million £ per hour every hour every day”

“This place is THICK with institutional corruption. You can buy an airlaine ticket to Strasburg for £45 return and be reimbursed £800. This has been going on for the last 20 years. The system is fraudulent an ROTTEN to the core.”

6 000 000 000 £ corruption per year. “They are to busy feathering their own nest.”

“The entire European Commission was forced to resign in disgrace”

The whole system is now so rotten that it is unreformable

“For the first time you are going to be ruled by people you cannot sack

The real face of European Union 6/6

“We have to vote for people who will not allow this continues surrender of sovereignty”

“A police fore with diplomatic immunity is an affront to democracy and highly dangerous”

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>

varning-2

North Pole Sea Ice TWICE AS THICK as expected

4 maj, 2009

Anyone seen any giant headlines in the media about this fact? Or some primetime network news about this finding?

I didn’t think so. Hm.. I wonder why??

How are the Global Warming Hysterics going to blame THIS on humans and CO2?

See also my posts Global Warming Appetizer – the cold is relentless, our sleeping bags are full of ice! And they are “studying global warming”

Global Warming Hysterics – the closed-minded dogmatism of a religious zealot

Why should anyone believe The Global Warming Hysterics?

Overall temperature trend since 1979 for Antarctica is slightly negative.

Glaciers in Norway Growing Again. And Alaskan Glaciers Grow for First Time in 250 years

Sunlight has more powerful influence on ocean circulation and climate than ice sheets

Global Warming Appetizer – Sea Surface Temperatures Are 2 to 8 Degrees Celsius Colder

Sea Ice INCREASES Due to Global Warming

Article here:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/10662

North Pole Sea Ice twice as thick as expected

By Editor  Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Radio Bremen

The research aircraft “Polar 5” today concluded its Arctic expedition in Canada. During the flight, researchers measured the current ice thickness at the North Pole and in areas that have never before been surveyed. The result: The sea-ice in the surveyed areas is apparently thicker than scientists had suspected. 

Normally, newly formed ice measures some two meters in thickness after two years. “Here, we measured ice thickness up to four meters,” said a spokesperson for Bremerhaven’s Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research. At present, this result contradicts the warming of the sea water, according to the scientists.

 Apart from measuring ice thickness, the composition of arctic air was also investigated. With the help of a laser, the researchers studied the level of pollution of the atmosphere by emissions from industrialized countries. In the next few weeks the results will be evaluated. Some 20 scientists from the U.S., Canada, Italy and Germany took part in the expedition. [transl. BJP]

German original here:

Überraschendes Ergebnis

Eisdecke am Nordpol ist dicker als erwartet

http://www-origin.radiobremen.de/wissen/nachrichten/wissenawipolararktis100.html

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6“ rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

varning-2

Vindkraften som en mycket, mycket dyr bergochdalbana med liten effekt – 13

3 maj, 2009

Som ett komplement till mitt inlägg  Vindkraften som en mycket, mycket dyr bergochdalbana med liten effekt – 12  kommer här aktuell driftstatistik från de svenska vindkraftverken från de senaste 30 dagarna.

2009-05-03_145719

Är det INTE FANTASTISKT MED DESSA OTROLIGA STORA VARIATIONER UPP OCH NER!

Den 30/4 så var produktionen DRYGT 4200 MWh per dygn. 1, jag säger 1 dag senare så var den drygt 1400 MWh per dygn!

EN MINSKNING AV PRODUKTIONEN PÅ DRYGT 67 %! PÅ 1 DAG!

Och detta är ju på inget sätt uniktTvärtom!

Här kommer några exempel från de svenska vindkraftverken den senaste tiden:

MED 50 % PÅ 1 DAG (18/3).

Med 89 % PÅ 2 DAGAR (23-25/1).

Med 98 % PÅ 3 DAGAR (23-26/1).

Med 84 % PÅ 2 DAGAR (12-14/1).

MED 84 % PÅ 2 DAGAR (22-24/12).

MED 67 % PÅ 1 DAG (10/12).

MED 50 % PÅ 1 DAG (11/12).

MED 87 % PÅ 3 DAGAR (27-30/11)

Lägg OCKSÅ märke till att trotts de senaste dagarnas gynnsamma vindar (3-8 M/S) så är den SAMLADE EFFEKTEN FRÅN DE SVENSKA VINDKRAFTVERKEN IDAG 10 %.

 Är det inte fantastiskt att det är detta MYCKET DYRA, OSÄKRA och MYCKET SUBVENTIONERADE energislag som skall “rädda” vår energiförsörjning.

 Allt enligt våra Global Warming Hysteriker och våra intälägänta inhemska politiker. Som säger att Sverige skall gå i “täten” och “ta ledningen” i kampen mot den mycket ondskedfulla och orsaken till ALLT ELÄNDE PÅ JORDEN – Nämligen CO2.

Se även mina andra inlägg om vindkraft:

Wind Power Exposed: The Renewable Energy Source is Expensive, Unreliable and Won’t Save Natural Gas. – And emits more CO2 than thought

The reality of wind power – Extremely high cost and unreliably

The Real Cost of Wind and Solar Power!

Why on earth do we put up with this green extortion?

All You Need To Know about Denmark and Wind Power

 Who knew a “free” source of energy – Wind Power could be so expensive?Overblown: The Real Cost of Wind Power!

Carbon Credits Fund Broken Turbine

Wind Turbines in Europe Do Nothing for Emissions-Reduction Goals

However costly, however uneconomic, however outright irrational you might have imagined windpower to be – the reality is even worse

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6“ rel=”tag”>miljö</a>

varning-2


%d bloggare gillar detta: