The greatest scientific and political scandal in modern times continues to unravel. And media is starting to cover it more and more as the consequences for politics and science is starting to sink in, really sink in.
“Warming Scandal: The architect of climate fraud steps down, the creator of the infamous ”hockey stick” is investigated, and Australia’s parliament defeats cap-and-trade. We love the smell of truth in the morning.”
“What has been passed off as climate science has taken on all the trappings of a cult. We need to hear the scientists whose work has been suppressed. We need to have the U.S. Senate follow the Australian Senate’s lead, but only after thorough hearings on what the East Anglia CRU charlatans faked.”
The Dominoes Fall
Posted 12/02/2009 07:11 PM ET
Warming Scandal: The architect of climate fraud steps down, the creator of the infamous ”hockey stick” is investigated, and Australia’s parliament defeats cap-and-trade. We love the smell of truth in the morning.
As the high priests of what Czech President Vaclav Klaus has called a ”religion” prepare their pilgrimage to worship the earth goddess Gaia in Copenhagen, complete with humanity being sacrificed, the heresy of climate truth is finally being heard.
The gospel of climate change, once expressed with the messianic fervor of an Elmer Gantry by Al Gore, is now expressed with the stammering incoherence of an Elmer Fudd by the defenders of doctored and destroyed data.
This environmental house of cards has started to collapse and hopefully heads have begun to roll. Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, fast becoming the Bernie Madoff of climate change research, has agreed to step aside for a time while his and the perfidy of his peers are reviewed.
He should be gone permanently.
”What is most important is that CRU continues its world-leading research with as little interruption and diversion as possible,” Jones said in a statement. When you are busy ”hiding the decline” in global temperatures, destroying data and e-mails, and suppressing dissent by real scientists who don’t fudge the numbers or have to, it’s not nice to be interrupted by the facts.
According to the Daily Collegian, the Penn State University student newspaper, professor Michael Mann, featured prominently in the CRU e-mails and creator of the famous and fraudulent ”hockey stick” showing a sharp and sudden increase in man-caused global warming, is being investigated by the university.
A Penn State panel will review every e-mail in question, at least the ones that haven’t been deleted, as Jones asked his co-conspirators to do. This includes Jones’ note to his colleagues telling them he had ”just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline” in temperatures.
The tragedy is that this manipulation of the truth has formed the basis of cap-and-trade bills such as Waxman-Markey and Kerry-Boxer. It’s found its way to the reports of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the driving force behind the failed Kyoto Pact and the upcoming attempt at Copenhagen to redistribute the world’s wealth as an offering to Gaia.
Meanwhile down under, a cap-and-trade scheme has gone under, defeated by a 41-35 vote in the Australian Senate. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd had hoped to take this trophy to Copenhagen, but opposition grew as it became apparent that Rudd’s Emissions Trading Scheme, a $114 billion carbon tax on emissions, would have wreaked havoc on Australia’s coal-dependent economy.
What the administration is proposing would wreak havoc on ours as well. That it’s based on made-up numbers from the lords of the tree rings at Britain’s CRU only compounds the travesty.
Which is why Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., ranking member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, is calling on Chairman Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., to conduct hearings into why America’s economic future should be sacrificed on Gaia’s altar.
Inhofe says the CRU e-mails revealed a ”possible deceitful manipulation of important data and research used by the U.S. Global Change Research Program and the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”
He suggests ”a possible conspiracy by scientists, some of whom receive or have received U.S. taxpayer funds, to stifle open, transparent debate on the most pressing issues of climate science.”
What has been passed off as climate science has taken on all the trappings of a cult. We need to hear the scientists whose work has been suppressed. We need to have the U.S. Senate follow the Australian Senate’s lead, but only after thorough hearings on what the East Anglia CRU charlatans faked.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter: Al Gore, Carbon Trading, CO2, Etanol, EU, EU Parlamentet, Global Warming Hysteri, Havsis, Havsnivå, IPCC, Isbjörnar, Journalism, Klimatmodeller, Korruption, Kyoto, Media, News, Obama, Orkaner, Peer review, Politik, Press, Riksdagen, Snötäcket, Temperaturdata, Traditional Media, UN, Vindkraft