Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar

Together with all the people in congress who voted for this bill. This is EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANTED AND INTENDED with this bill. But to get it through Congress they gladly and willfully lied through their teeth and ears, they even gladly put their lies in writing.

I, and many, many others told you so before the Obama  Care “reform” was rammed through at all costs  against the will of the American people.

Se my posts https://uddebatt.wordpress.com/tag/obama-care/

We where told by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it

Well, we REALLY did find out a lot of things, and remember it’s just the beginning:

It’s going to ruin states, it’s going to be ENFORCED by IRS, close hospitals, fewer doctors, rationing (the new government agency, the Medicare Advisory Board, Section 3403 of the senate bill, that is going to decide (ration) what kind of Medicare you are going to receive), cuts in Medicare, increase the health care costs for companies by billions (and who do you think is going to pay for that?), etc. etc.

And then there were ALL these kickbacks, bribes and pork barrel spending in there to get the bill through at ALL COST.

And worst of all, the blatant hypocrisy from this new nomenklatura:

President Obama declared that the new health care law ”is going to be affecting every American family.” Except his own, of course.

The new health care law exempts the president from having to participate in it. Leadership and committee staffers in the House and Senate who wrote the bill are exempted as well.

And as I have said before:

Meanwhile, we await Mr. Obama’s explanation why if his ”historic” health care law is so great for America, it’s not good enough for him and his family.

And remember – They DELIBERATELY PULLED THE TRIGGER ON THIS LOADED GUN knowing fully well “most” of the consequences.

Here are just two examples– abortion and IRS :

This is what president Obama said on radio August 19, 2009 about abortion funding. And remember, he was talking to religious leaders. That’s why he use such “biblical language” as “bearing false witness”:

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: “There are some folks out there who are frankly bearing false witness. But I want everyone to know what health insurance reform is all about. You’ve heard that this is all going to mean government-funding of abortion. Not true. This is all — these are all fabrications that have been put out there in order to discourage people from meeting what I consider to be a core ethical and moral obligation.”

President Obama deliberately lied strait in to the faces of these religious leaders. Nice man wouldn’t you say?

“Is the ink Mr President even dry on your executive order? What is your word worth Sir?”

Remember, President Obama issued an executive order to reassure, and promise democrat Stupack and other democrat protesters so that they would vote for the bill, that the health care bill WOULD NEVER FEDERAL FUND ANY ABORTION.

The Executive order Mach 24:

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Consistency with Longstanding Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-acts-consistency-with-longst

Obama Administration Approves First Direct Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Through New High-Risk Insurance Pools

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/69384

Obamacare Covers Abortion in Pennsylvania — and in New Mexico, Too  

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjRiNTU0ZjU1NmY0ZDZiZjJhY2UxYWM5N2U1YjJmZjk=

Maryland Becomes Second State to Offer Federally Funded Abortions under Obama care

Friday, July 16, 2010

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/69559

New Coverage Information for Maryland Residents with Preexisting Conditions

http://marylandhealthinsuranceplan.state.md.us/mhip/news/News_20100707.html

Obamacare abortions on tap

Pennsylvania program pays the piper

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/13/obamacare-abortions-on-tap/

Where have you gone, Bart Stupak? Even more importantly, where is your voice, Kathy Dahlkemper?

These Democrats – from Michigan and Pennsylvania respectively – were two of the final six supposedly pro-life House members who voted to pass Obamacare. They sold their anti-abortion principles for the fool’s gold of an executive order purportedly banning the use of federal funds for destroying unborn children. Now comes the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), in a finding released yesterday, to show proof positive just how tarnished that fool’s gold actually is.

In Rep. Dahlkemper‘s own Keystone State, the federal government on June 28 approved rules governing $160 million in federal taxpayer money for a ”high risk” insurance program that will – repeat: absolutely, positively will – cover just about any abortion before the 24th week of pregnancy. The Pennsylvania plan submitted to the feds provides coverage for ”only” those abortions that satisfy certain state laws. But the key, applicable state law allows abortion if a single doctor decides it is necessary for reasons that include psychology, emotions or the woman’s age.

This isn’t merely a loophole you can drive a truck through; it’s a canyon you can fly through in O Force One. It’s as open an invitation to taxpayer-funded abortion as can be imagined.

What’s worse is that this high-risk insurance program evades laws that ordinarily would govern the use of both federal and Pennsylvania tax money. It skirts the executive order because the order applies only to new insurance ”exchanges” and ”community health programs,” not these purportedly high risk insurance programs. It also avoids state law 3215(c), which forbids state government funds from being used for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or threats to the mother’s life. Because this state program is to be run entirely with federal funds, not state funds, 3215(c) doesn’t apply. How clever.

When the Stupak-Dahlkemper gang sold their souls to support passage of Obamacare, both the NRLC and the pro-abortion Planned Parenthood organization dismissed the executive order. The presidential concession is so loophole-ridden and so legally unenforceable to make it only ”a symbolic gesture,” in the words of Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards.

”The Obamacare law is full of faucets that can be opened to provide abortion subsidies,” NRLC legislative director Douglas Johnson told The Washington Times yesterday. ”Regrettably, this is just the first.” It also is the one that will most directly affect Mrs. Dahlkemper‘s constituents – most notably her future constituents who won’t even be born because of this program, created directly as a result of her unconscionable vote. That’s a pretty dark legacy for a congressional freshman who campaigned as a pro-lifer.

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times,

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518904575365223062942574.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_carousel_2

Lost in Taxation

The IRS’s vast new ObamaCare powers.

JULY 17, 2010

If it seems as if the tax code was conceived by graphic artist M.C. Escher, wait until you meet the new and not improved Internal Revenue Service created by ObamaCare. What, you’re not already on a first-name basis with your local IRS agent?

National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson, who operates inside the IRS, highlighted the agency’s new mission in her annual report to Congress last week. Look out below. She notes that the IRS is already ”greatly taxed”—pun intended?—”by the additional role it is playing in delivering social benefits and programs to the American public,” like tax credits for first-time homebuyers or purchasing electric cars. Yet with ObamaCare, the agency is now responsible for ”the most extensive social benefit program the IRS has been asked to implement in recent history.” And without ”sufficient funding” it won’t be able to discharge these new duties.

That wouldn’t be tragic, given that those new duties include audits to determine who has the insurance ”as required by lawand collecting penalties from Americans who don’t. Companies that don’t sponsor health plans will also be punished. This crackdown will ”involve nearly every division and function of the IRS,” Ms. Olson reports.

Well, well. Republicans argued during the health debate that the IRS would have to hire hundreds of new agents and staff to enforce ObamaCare. They were brushed off by Democrats and the press corps as if they believed the President was born on the moon. The IRS says it hasn’t figured out how much extra money and manpower it will need but admits that both numbers are greater than zero.

Ms. Olson also exposed a damaging provision that she estimates will hit some 30 million sole proprietorships and subchapter S corporations, two million farms and one million charities and other tax-exempt organizations. Prior to ObamaCare, businesses only had to tell the IRS the value of services they purchase. But starting in 2013 they will also have to report the value of goods they buy from a single vendor that total more than $600 annually—including office supplies and the like.

Democrats snuck in this obligation to narrow the mythical ”tax gap” of unreported business income, but Ms. Olson says that the tracking costs for small businesses will be ”disproportionate as compared with any resulting improvement in tax compliance.” Job creation, here we come . . . at least for the accountants who will attempt to comply with a vast new 1099 reporting burden.

Meanwhile, the IRS will be inundated with useless information, because without a huge upgrade its information systems won’t be able to manage and track the nanodetails.

In a Monday letter, even Democratic Senators Mark Begich (Alaska), Ben Nelson (Nebraska), Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) and Evan Bayh (Indiana) denounce this new ”burden” on small businesses and insist that the IRS use its discretion to find ”better ways to structure this reporting requirement.” In other words, they want regulators to fix one problem among many that all four Senators created by voting for ObamaCare.

We never thought anyone would be nostalgic for the tax system of a few months ago, but post-ObamaCare, here we are.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>

Advertisements

Etiketter: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

7 svar to “Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar”

  1. Tweets that mention Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt -- Topsy.com Says:

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Business Fun, SteveTaff. SteveTaff said: Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar …: Remember, President Obama issued an… http://bit.ly/d0KJbj – Freedom? […]

  2. Oscar Peterson Says:

    Dear Sophia Albertina
    There is not a bad thing that has not a good thing with it, right?
    There is now no money left to continue to tax the people of the United States or or other nations in the rest of the world to a living standard of a medieval cage stage because of paying for saving C02 for saving ONE DEGREE CELSIUS on the worlds clime 100 years from now! The Global Warming hysteria is finally at the beginning of the end when you read the following.

    Congratulations Sophia Albertina. It will be an interesting autumn when Al Gore presumably will be asked (a court proceeding is under way in Norway as it’s thought that the Nobel Committee has seen to it that too many individuals have received the Peace Prize wrongfully) to give back his Nobel Peace Prize which he and the UN-panel so wrongly received.

    ……………

    How Washington failed on climate change

    By Stephen Stromberg
    Thursday, July 29, 2010; A23

    Who killed the climate bill? Democrats who supported climate legislation in the House feel betrayed, The Post reports; after they approved a controversial cap-and-trade bill, Democratic leaders failed even to hold a vote on similar legislation in the Senate, and GOP challengers are on the attack. A few environmentalists blame lawmakers who led the effort for compromising some good policy out of the legislation.

    But the real answer is simpler: Too many senators have little, if any, incentives to pass climate policy that’s rational in the long term and good for the country as a whole. Also to blame is President Obama’s policy agenda, which prioritized health care.

    The ire of activists — such as Rockefeller Family Fund Director Lee Wasserman, who wrote Monday in the New York Times that the bill failed because it was one ”for historic polluters, not the American people” — is understandable. Congress toiled with industry and enviros to produce compromise legislation that was, well, compromised. In the Senate, a proposal that started out with a carbon cap on most of the economy ended up with one limiting just the utilities sector. In the House, negotiators agreed to big subsidies for ”clean coal” technology and other favored projects. Pollution permits that should be auctioned were to be given to favored groups. A simple carbon tax or a cap-and-rebate program would have been better.

    These compromises made the bills longer, more complicated and easier to criticize. But saying they were the primary reasons the Senate bill died last week is like saying it was difficult for Democrats to pass health care because the bill didn’t dismantle the employer-sponsored health system. Such a proposal might have attracted interest among lawmakers who ultimately opposed health-reform legislation. But other votes would have evaporated, too.

    Two factors enabled lawmakers to feel comfortable opposing carbon-pricing policies in whatever form they came this year.

    First was the system. There aren’t many incentives for lots of senators to vote for a reasonable climate bill. Senators from coal states and the South worried that their regions would be disproportionately hurt. The effects of climate change won’t be dire for years; and Congress, with its frequent elections, isn’t good at accepting short-term pain for long-term gain.

    With few exceptions, Republicans have behaved shamefully on climate issues in this Congress, opposing policies that their party embraced in the 1990s (think cap-and-trade). Yet none of them will pay a price in November, and many GOP challengers will benefit.

    The second factor was Obama. Someone had to change the balance of incentives acting on lawmakers. Buying them off one by one got negotiators somewhere, but not far enough. The effort required a sustained presidential push — the sort that involves plenty of face time and convinces enough senators that they could lose if they obstructed.

    Obama, however, decided to elevate another complicated, politically fraught issue first. He and his party were pummeled for months before health care passed. After that battering, Democrats chose to complete financial reform. That dragged on, too. Eventually, there wasn’t much time left on the legislative calendar for climate policy, and the president, having exhausted Congress with big initiatives, didn’t appear keen to press hard for a meaningful climate bill.

    Obama’s Oval Office address on energy policy last month barely alluded to carbon pricing. Obama brought senators to the White House to discuss climate, but those meetings lacked the prominence of previous policy summits and accomplished little. Hill staffers and environmental lobbyists complained about a lack of engagement from the administration, saying that they couldn’t get guidance on legislative language Obama would defend.

    To be fair, the president got some green initiatives into last year’s stimulus. Nevertheless, those involved in the climate debate began to sound like the supporters of union ”card check” legislation and other liberal priorities that Obama snubbed in his first two years. ”Where is the president?” became a common, off-the-record refrain, feeding a broader narrative about a White House that gave a dysfunctional Congress too much deference and failed to deliver quickly on countless commitments.

    That narrative, though, isn’t quite right. Obama didn’t sell out his supporters. He prioritized. It was never likely that he would get two major reforms in his first two years, while also cleaning up after the worst financial crisis in decades. And it will be tough to get anything grand through future Congresses with fewer Democrats. So the choice wasn’t between a climate bill and no climate bill. It was between a climate bill and health reform.

    The president had the political capital and the numbers in Congress to pass something big. He chose health care.

    —————————

    • sophiaalbertina Says:

      Oscar

      On the contrary; the effect of the health care bill, and now the financial bill, the taxes are going to increase for ALL Americans. Especially for small businesses, but ALL companies (big or small) are going to suffer.

      Add to that that Obama has more than quadrupled the budget deficit IN ONE YEAR. A new world record

      Through the Health Care bill the government control 60% of the economy. And after the now passed “financial bill” the government control 70% of the economy. US is no longer a free market economy, it is now worse that some of the European socialist ones. All in one and half year of Obama.

      And the article you are quoting is from Washington Post. A “newspaper” that actively supports AND works with the Obama administration to help their agenda.

      The so called “mainstream media” have played along and heavily supported this total takeover of the economy and transformation of the American society.

      JournoList was founded by one of Washington posts “journalists” (Ezra Klein) and others so called “journalist” from the paper were also members (Greg Sargent, Dave Weigel. Alec McGillis, Michael Hirsh, Ben Adler etc.)

      JournoList have proven ones and for all, they the so called “mainstream media” are nothing more than the prolonged propaganda arm of the ”progressive democrats”. This is nothing new, but it is a sad fact of the state of so called journalism in most of the mainstream media in US.

      AT THE SAME TIME AS THESE MEDIA HAVE TAKEN AN ACTIVE PART in SUPPRESSING FACTS and IS CENSORING AND INTIMIDATING EVERYONE WHO HAS OPPOSED THIS GLOBAL WARMING HYSTERIA.

      A truly “worthy” goal for the organizations and companies whose goals was supposed to protect and enhance freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Talking about the ultimate betrayal of all that good and independent journalism was supposed to be.

  3. Obama Care 34 – Which system does you thinks works best? « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Ett rättframt, öppet och intressant forum! « Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar […]

  4. Obama Care – Which system do YOU thinks works best? « The Daily Bayonet Says:

    […] a complement to my previous post Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar I thought it would be educational to compare the old health care and the new Obama […]

  5. America, You are at a tipping point and you have your last change to stop it – Part 1 « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar […]

  6. The US election – Yes we have NO bananas « UD/RK Samhälls Debatt Says:

    […] Obama Care 33 – President Obama is a willful and certified liar […]

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


%d bloggare gillar detta: