Part 4: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler

And the cooling continues. Even on a regional level. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind everywhere. Move on, NOTHING to see here.

Here is the last part of my regional analysis of the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a regional perspective.

I wanted to see how the national trend is, or is not, mimicked in the 9 US climate regions. And how these regional decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.

Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.

I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.

And since the October temperature data are just out today I will do a quick comparison between the 10 months (year to date, January-October) data and compare it with the 9 months data.

Part 1 here:

Part 1: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler

Part 2 here:

Part 2: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler

Part 3 here:

Part 3: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler

And as I always point out:

Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.

Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.

Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.

So to summarize this evidence of this US regional “accelerated warming” trend:

                               North West (WA, OR and ID)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 1.39 F / Decade

                                        West (CA and NV)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.38 F / Decade

                    West North Central (MT, NE, ND, SD and WY)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.19 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 2.08 F / Decade

                           Southwest (AZ, CO, NM and UT)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.18 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 1.84 F / Decade

South (AR, LA, KS, MS, OK and TX)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.01 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.19 F / Decade

East North Central (IA, MI, MN and WI)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.05 F / Decade

                     Central (IL, IN, KY, MO, OH, TN and WV)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.02 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.33 F / Decade

Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is – 0.03 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.26 F / Decade

Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)

The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.09 F / Decade

The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.83 F / Decade

And as I said in the beginningalways remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..

Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??

And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.

As I said in the beginning the temperature data for October is just out today so I thought it would be really interesting to compare the new 10 month consecutive month trend for 111 years to the 9 month data in my posts.

So here is a quick comparison for the Trend/Decade for 1900-2011 (and this time I spare you all the graphs OK):

                             North West (WA, OR and ID)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER

                                      West (CA and NV)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is none, it is the same.

               West North Central (MT, NE, ND, SD and WY)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.17 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER

                         Southwest (AZ, CO, NM and UT)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.17 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.01 F COOLER

                         South (AR, LA, KS, MS, OK and TX)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.01 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is none, it is the same.

                    East North Central (IA, MI, MN and WI)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.09 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER

                    Central (IL, IN, KY, MO, OH, TN and WV)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.00 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER

                        Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is – 0.04 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is 0.01 F COOLER

   Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.07 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER

And remember that this is the whole 10 month consecutive temperature Trend/ Decade for 111 years.

I don’t know about you, but I consider this 10 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.

And what was the difference between the 9 and 10 month Trend/Decade?

In 7 regions the COOLING increased and in 2 they stayed the same.

According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.

And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F in 100 years?

But not this ACTUAL trend?

And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.

And remember that there where two regions that had some warming during 2000-2011 (SE and NE). And that in reality it was a few states that were behind this warming in each region?

So I could not help myself but to include the new data for 2000-2011 (and I could not resist the graphs either):

                    Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.15 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.11 F COOLER

   Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)

The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.80 F / Decade

The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.03 F COOLER

So the only two regions that had some warming during 2000-2011 are COOLING too.

So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.

Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really comfortable and warm.

Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.

That is truly “Global Warming” on a regional US style.

An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.

This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.

Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>

Etiketter: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


%d bloggare gillar detta: