Posts Tagged ‘Site Information Handbook’
23 januari, 2014
Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is really an imminent threat to humankind.
The Recent 12 Months for the year of 2013 U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 0.8 F COOLER in 100 years
So far I have shown you the 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, 9 months and 10 months trend for US temperature 2013.
(See here:
January U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 9.4 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 11.3 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 4.1 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 5.4 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 5.7 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 0.7 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 1.1 F COOLER in 100 years)
So to sum it all up, here is the recent 12 months (year to date, January- December) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 12 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.12 F / Decade
(OBS! Notice how distorted the trend line of this official graph is. It looks gigantic because they on purpose chose different scale for the different axis. But in reality it is only 0,12 F/Decade)
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.48 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.42 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.33 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.08 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for January – December is exactly – 0.08 F degrees a decade. That is – 0.8 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 12 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.48 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.42 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.33 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.08 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, CMP 9, Conference of the Parties, Continental U.S., cool the past, COP 19, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January-December Temperature, January-December U.S. Temperature, January-December U.S. Temperature Trend, January-October Temperature, January-October U.S. Temperature, January-October U.S. Temperature Trend, Kyoto Protocol, land use change factors, measurement biases, Meeting of the Parties, NASA, NCDC, October temperature, October temperature trend, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 10 Months Temperature, Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature Trend, Recent 12 Months Temperature, Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature Trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Temperature trend, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, UN, UNFCCC, United Nations Climate Change Conferences, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
23 november, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is really an imminent threat to humankind. Especially in Warsaw
As I promised in my previous post from yesterday (Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 0.7 F COOLER in 100 years), here comes the follow up with the 10 month historic trend for US temperature.
As I said, all inspired by the shenanigans going on in Warsaw. Dedicated with “special love” to the traveling UN Circus now performing in Warsaw (COP 19 and CMP 9).
“The most costly, disastrous and hypocritical Political Show on Earth Paid by us the common people”
So here are the recent 10 months (year to date, January- October) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 10 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 10 months (Jan- Oct) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.13 F / Decade
US temperature recent 10 months (Jan- Oct) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.49 F / Decade
US temperature recent 10 months (Jan- Oct) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.42 F / Decade
US temperature recent 10 months (Jan- Oct) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.31 F / Decade
US temperature recent 10 months (Jan- Oct) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.11 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for January – October is exactly – 0.11 F degrees a decade. That is – 1.1 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate my previous post for nine months and their trend /decade:
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.52 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.43 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.34 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.07 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend one month later can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 10 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.49 F degrees a decade.
The recent 10 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.42 F degrees a decade.
The recent 10 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.31 F degrees a decade.
The recent 10 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.11 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
——————————————————————————
So to sum up these two last posts I am going to do an executive summary dedicated to our “intelligent” politicians, especially those now performing in Warsaw. And I am going to make a bold presumption here, namely that they know how to count, and even know the difference between + and – . You never know, there may be someone out there.
Executive Summary:
If we compare this year’s 9 month trend with last year’s 9 month trend it is COOLER this year.
And if we compare this year’s 9 month trend with this year’s 10 month trend it is COOLER.
OK?
Can you now do the math and maybe draw at least some conclusions? Or is this too hard?
—————————————————————————
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, CMP 9, Conference of the Parties, Continental U.S., cool the past, COP 19, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January-October Temperature, January-October U.S. Temperature, January-October U.S. Temperature Trend, Kyoto Protocol, land use change factors, measurement biases, Meeting of the Parties, NASA, NCDC, October temperature, October temperature trend, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 10 Months Temperature, Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature Trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Temperature trend, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, UN, UNFCCC, United Nations Climate Change Conferences, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, Warsaw, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
22 november, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is really an imminent threat to humankind. Especially in Warsaw.
I was not planning to do another update of the US temperature from a “historic” perspective. But I was so inspired by the shenanigans going on in Warsaw that I felt I had to.
So here it comes, first the 9 month trend and in a later post the 10 month trend. Dedicated with “special love” to the traveling UN Circus now performing in Warsaw (COP 19 and CMP 9).
An old advertisement for the Barnum & Bailey Circus in 1900 said: “The greatest Show on Earth”. I think a more apt one for the present one going on would be “The most costly, disastrous and hypocritical Political Show on Earth Paid by us the common people”
They were supposed to finish today but, as usual they have prolonged the proceedings. They have in negotiation speak “stopped the clock”.
I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent 9 months (year to date, January- September) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.13 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.52 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.43 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.34 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.07 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for Jan- September is exactly – 0.07 F degrees a decade. That is – 0.7 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the last years (2012) figures for nine months and their trend /decade (see my post: Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: 1.5 F Warmer in 100 years):
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.54 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.46 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.42 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is 0.15 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend one year later can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 9 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.52 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.43 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.34 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.07 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, CMP 9, Conference of the Parties, Continental U.S., cool the past, COP 19, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - September temperature, January-September U.S. Temperature, January-September U.S. Temperature trend, Kyoto Protocol, land use change factors, measurement biases, Meeting of the Parties, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, September temperature trend, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Temperature trend, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, UN, UNFCCC, United Nations Climate Change Conferences, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, Warsaw, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
16 juni, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is really an imminent threat to humankind.
Very late again, the official May temperature figures are out.
As a complement to my previous post Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 5.4 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 5 months (year to date, January- May) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 5 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.16 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.57 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.36 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.00 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.57 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for Jan- May is exactly – 0.57 F degrees a decade. That is – 5.7 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the last three, four and five months and their trend /decade (see my previous posts):
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.41 F / Decade
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.54 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.57 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 5 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.57 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.36 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.00 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.57 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, April temperature, April temperature trend, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - April temperature, January - April temperature trend, January - April US temperature, January - March temperature, January - March temperature trend, January - March US temperature trend, January - May temperature, January - May temperature trend, January - May US temperature, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, March temperature, March temperature trend, May temperature, May temperature trend, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend, Recent 4 Months Temperature, Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature trend, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
15 juni, 2013
Here we are in the end of spring and beginning of summer and it is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is really an imminent threat to humankind.
Very late, the official May temperature figures are out.so I thought I dive into it.
As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent May US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature May 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.13 F / Decade
US temperature May 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.35 F / Decade
US temperature May 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.29 F / Decade
US temperature May 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.26F / Decade
US temperature May 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.68 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for May is exactly – 0.68 F degrees a decade. That is a – 6.8 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of May ”accelerated warming” trend:
The May trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.35 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.29 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.26 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.68 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, May temperature, May temperature trend, May US temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
17 maj, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
Very late again, the official April temperature figures are out. Last year the temperature anomaly was 3.66 F and this year it is – 1.35 F.
As a complement to my previous post Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 4.1 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 4 months (year to date, January- April) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 4 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.17 F / Decade
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.63 F / Decade
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.38 F / Decade
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is – 0.07 F / Decade
US temperature recent 4 months (Jan- Apr) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.54 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for Jan- Apr is exactly – 0.54 F degrees a decade. That is – 5.4 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the 3 month January-March trend /decade (see my previous post):
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.41 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 4 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.63 F degrees a decade.
The recent 4 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.38 F degrees a decade.
The recent 4 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly– 0.07 F degrees a decade.
The recent 4 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.54 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, April temperature, April temperature trend, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - April temperature, January - April temperature trend, January - April US temperature, January - March temperature, January - March temperature trend, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, March temperature, March temperature trend, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 2 Months Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature trend, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend, Recent 4 Months Temperature, Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 4 Months U.S. Temperature trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA | 2 Comments »
16 maj, 2013
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent threat to humankind.
Very late, the official April temperature figures are out.so I thought I dive into it.
As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent April US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature April 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature April 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.43 F / Decade
US temperature April 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.22 F / Decade
US temperature April 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.39F / Decade
US temperature April 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.92 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for April is exactly – 0.92 F degrees a decade. That is a – 9.2 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And remember that this year the January trend /decade were – 0.94 F / Decade for 2000 to 2013 (see my previous post). And that’s in the middle of the winter.
And here we are in the middle of “spring” and the trend is – 0.92.
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of April ”accelerated warming” trend:
The April trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.43 F degrees a decade.
The April trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.22 F degrees a decade.
The April trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.39 F degrees a decade.
The April trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.92 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, April temperature, April temperature trend, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
15 april, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
Very late, the official March temperature figures are out. Last year the temperature was 8.55 F and this year it is – 1.09 F.
As a complement to my previous post Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 11.3 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 3 months (year to date, January- March) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 3 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.19 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.70 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.43 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is – 0.22 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan- Mar) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.41 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for Jan-Mar is exactly – 0.41 F degrees a decade. That is – 4.1 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 3 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.70 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.43 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly – 0.22 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.41 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - March temperature, January - March temperature trend, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, March temperature, March temperature trend, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 2 Months Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature trend, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
12 mars, 2013
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post February U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 12.7 F COOLER in 100 years (which I by the way was suspended by WordPress for), I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 2 months (year to date, January- February) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 2 month, a year by year consecutive trend 113 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 2 months (Jan- Feb) 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.20 F / Decade
US temperature recent 2 months (Jan- Feb) 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.75 F / Decade
US temperature recent 2 months (Jan- Feb) 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.35 F / Decade
US temperature recent 2 months (Jan- Feb) 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is – 0.56 F / Decade
US temperature recent 2 months (Jan- Feb) 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 1.13 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2013 to 2000-2013??
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for Jan-Feb is exactly – 1.13 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping – 11.3 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 2 months trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.75 F degrees a decade.
The recent 2 months trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.35 F degrees a decade.
The recent 2 months trend 1990-2013 is exactly – 0.56 F degrees a decade.
The recent 2 months trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 1.13 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - February temperature, January - February temperature trend, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 2 Months Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 2 Months U.S. Temperature trend, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
11 mars, 2013
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
The official February temperature figures are out. And as a complement to my previous post January U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 9.4 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought I dive into it.
As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent February US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature February 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.28 F / Decade
US temperature February 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 0.37 F / Decade
US temperature February 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.02 F / Decade
US temperature February 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is – 1.17 F / Decade
US temperature February 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 1.27 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for February is exactly – 1.27 F degrees a decade. That is a – 12.7 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the January trend /decade (se my previous post):
US temperature January 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.69 F / Decade
US temperature January 2000-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.05 F / Decade
US temperature January 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.94 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F ?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of February ”accelerated warming” trend:
The February trend 1970-2013 is exactly 0.37 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.02 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 1990-2013 is exactly – 1.17 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 1.27 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
15 februari, 2013
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
It is four months since I last checked the OFFICIAL USA temperature figures and now the official January temperature figures are out.
So I thought I dive into it. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent January US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 113 years
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 43 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature January 1900-2013
The trend for 1900 to 2013 is 0.11 F / Decade
US temperature January 1970-2013
The trend for 1970 to 2013 is 1.13 F / Decade
US temperature January 1980-2013
The trend for 1980 to 2013 is 0.69 F / Decade
US temperature January 1990-2013
The trend for 1990 to 2013 is 0.05 F / Decade
US temperature January 2000-2013
The trend for 2000 to 2013 is – 0.94 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2013 for January is exactly – 0.94 F degrees a decade. That is a – 9.4 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of January ”accelerated warming” trend:
The January trend 1970-2013 is exactly 1.13 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 1980-2013 is exactly 0.69 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 1990-2013 is exactly 0.05 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 2000-2013 is exactly – 0.94 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 43 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
10 oktober, 2012
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post September U.S. Temperature trend/decade: 3.2 F Warmer in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 9 months (year to date, January- September) US temperature from a “historic” perspective since we now have a whole year of official data. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month, a year by year consecutive trend 112 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
And some more glaring official change and CONSTANT manipulation of “HISTORICAL” temperature data.
http://junkscience.com/2012/02/11/hayden-lies-damned-lies-and-climate-alarmism/
“The graph below shows historical data sets from the NASA-GISS website as published in 2009 and in 2012. The manipulation is obvious. The larger temperature trend is more to the liking of the climate alarmists.”
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Hansen_etal.pdf
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/08/dear-noaa-and-seth-which-1930s-were-you-referring-to-when-you-say-july-is-the-record-warmest/
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/10/10/top-five-hottest-12-month-periods-all-ended-in-1934/
In the U.S., the warmest decade was the 1930s and the warmest year was 1934. And this is how that was erased between 1999 and 2011.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.14 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.54 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.46 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.42 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is 0.15 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2012 to 2000-2012??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 is exactly 0.15 F (0.08 C) degrees warmer a decade. That is a whopping 1.5 F (0.8 C) warmer in 100 years.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise but not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 9 months trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.54 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.46 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1990-2012 is exactly0.42 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 2000-2012 is exactly 0.15 F (0.08 C) degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - August temperature, January - August temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, September temperature trend, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Temperature trend, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
9 oktober, 2012
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
The official September temperature figures are out. So I thought I dive into it. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent September US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
Just to remind you what is going on, here is just another in a long row of examples:
Many diligent people keep track of the CONSTANT manipulation and change of “HISTORICAL” temperature data. One is Ole Humlum, professor in Geosciences at Oslo University http://climate4you.com/.
(My underline/bold and changes in the graphs and text).
“Maturity diagram showing net change since 17 May 2008 in the global monthly surface air temperature record prepared by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), USA. The net result of the adjustments made are becoming substantial, and adjustments since May 2006 occasionally exceeds 0.1oC. Before 1945 global temperatures are generally changed toward lower values, and toward higher values after 1945 resulting in a more pronounced 20th century warming (about 0.15oC) compared to the NCDC temperature record published in May 2008. Last diagram update: 17 September 2012.”
Click on the graph and it gets larger
“The diagram below exemplify adjustments made by NCDC since May 2008 for two months (see arrows in diagram above); January 1915 and January 2000.”
Click on the graph and it gets larger
So here are the trends:
US temperature September1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.07 F / Decade
US temperature September 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.49 F / Decade
US temperature September 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.59 F / Decade
US temperature September 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.44 F / Decade
US temperature September 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is 0.32 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 for September is exactly 0.32 F (0.17 C) degrees a decade. That is a 3.2 F (1.7 C) warmer in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the official figures from September last year (2011) and the trend /decade:
US temperature September 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.35 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise but not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of September ”accelerated warming” trend:
The September trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.49 F degrees a decade.
The September trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.59 F degrees a decade.
The September trend 1990-2012 is exactly 0.44 F degrees a decade.
The September trend 2000-2012 is exactly 0.32 F (0.17 C) degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, glob, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, September temperature trend, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
11 september, 2012
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous August U.S. Temperature trend/decade: 2.2 F Warmer in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 8 months (year to date, January-August) US temperature from a “historic” perspective since we now have a whole year of official data. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 8 month, a year by year consecutive trend 112 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan- Aug) 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.15 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan- Aug) 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.54 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan- Aug) 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.45 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan- Aug) 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.40 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan- Aug) 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is 0.08 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2012 to 2000-2012??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 is exactly 0.08 F degrees warmer a decade. That is a whopping 0.8 F warmer in 100 years.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 8 months trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.54 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.45 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 1990-2012 is exactly0.40 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 2000-2012 is exactly 0.08 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, August temperature, August temperature trend, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - August temperature, January - August temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Temperature trend, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
11 september, 2012
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
It is three months since I last checked the OFFICIAL USA temperature figures and now the official August temperature figures are out. (May U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 7.8 F COOLER in 100 years and Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 2.6 F COOLER in 100 years)
So I thought I dive into it. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent August US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature August 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature August 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.48 F / Decade
US temperature August 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.45 F / Decade
US temperature August 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.78 F / Decade
US temperature August 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is 0.22 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 for August is exactly 0.22 F degrees a decade. That is a 2.2 F warmer in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of August ”accelerated warming” trend:
The August trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.48 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.45 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 1990-2012 is exactly 0.78 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 2000-2012 is exactly 0.22 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, August temperature, August temperature trend, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
10 juni, 2012
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post May U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 7.8 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 5 months (year to date, January-May) US temperature from a “historic” perspective since we now have a whole year of official data. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 5 month, a year by year consecutive trend 112 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.17 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.62 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.44 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan- May) 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 0.26 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.).
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2012 to 2000-2012??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 is exactly – 0.26 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a – 2.6 F COOLER in 100 years.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 5 months trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.62 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.44 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 1990-2012 is exactly 0.12 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 2000-2012 is exactly – 0.26 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January - May temperature, January - May temperature trend, land use change factors, May temperature, May temperature trend, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
9 juni, 2012
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
I have been busy with other things but I saw that the official May temperature figures are out. So I thought I dive into it. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent May US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature May 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.14 F / Decade
US temperature May 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.36 F / Decade
US temperature May 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.29 F / Decade
US temperature May 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.30 F / Decade
US temperature May 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 0.78 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 for February is exactly – 0.78 F degrees a decade. That is a – 7.8 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of May ”accelerated warming” trend:
The May trend 1970-2012 is exactly 0.36 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 1980-2012 is exactly 0.29 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 1990-2012 is exactly 0.30 F degrees a decade.
The May trend 2000-2012 is exactly – 0.78 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, May temperature, May temperature trend, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, U.S.Temperature Trend, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
8 mars, 2012
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
The official February temperature figures are out. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent February US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 42 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature February 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.29 F / Decade
US temperature February 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 0.39 F / Decade
US temperature February 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.03 F / Decade
US temperature February 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is – 1.27 F / Decade
US temperature February 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 1.63 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 for February is exactly – 1.63 F degrees a decade. That is a – 16.3 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
And to REALLY show you this “accelerated warming” trend lets recapitulate the last three months and their trend /decade (se my previous posts):
US temperature December 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.86 F / Decade
US temperature January 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 1.18 F / Decade
US temperature February 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 1.63 F / Decade
You REALLY, REALLY can see the accelerating trend can you not?
Take cover – The sweat is really breaking out.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of February ”accelerated warming” trend:
The February trend 1970-2011 is exactly 0.39 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.03 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 1990-2011 is exactly – 1.27 F degrees a decade.
The February trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.63 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 42 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, February temperature trend, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
8 februari, 2012
It is getting cooler and cooler. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
The official January temperature figures are out. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent January US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 112 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature January 1900-2012
The trend for 1900 to 2012 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature January 1970-2012
The trend for 1970 to 2012 is 1.16 F / Decade
US temperature January 1980-2012
The trend for 1980 to 2012 is 0.72 F / Decade
US temperature January 1990-2012
The trend for 1990 to 2012 is 0.03 F / Decade
US temperature January 2000-2012
The trend for 2000 to 2012 is – 1.18 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.).
So the “warming trend” 2000-2012 for January is exactly – 1.18 F degrees a decade. That is a – 11.8 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of January ”accelerated warming” trend:
The January trend 1970-2011 is exactly 1.16 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.72 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.03 F degrees a decade.
The January trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.18 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, January temperature, January temperature trend, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 7 Comments »
8 januari, 2012
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post December U.S. Temperature trend/decade: – 8.6 F COOLER in 100 years, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 12 months (year to date, January-December) US temperature from a “historic” perspective since we now have a whole year of official data. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 12 month, a year by year consecutive trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan-Dec) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.45 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.37 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.22 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (Jan- Dec) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.60 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.60 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 6.0 F COOLER in 100 years. The freezer next!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 12 months trend 1970-2011 is exactly 0.45 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.37 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.22 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.60 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, January-December U.S. Temperature, land use change factors, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 12 Months Temperature, Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
8 januari, 2012
The official December temperature figures are out. As usual I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent December US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature December 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.12 F / Decade
US temperature December 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.34 F / Decade
US temperature December 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.40 F / Decade
US temperature December 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.86 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 for December is exactly – 0.86 F degrees a decade. That is a – 8.6 F COOLER in 100 years. That’s what I call “warming”!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of Decembers ”accelerated warming” trend:
The December trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.34 F degrees a decade.
The December trend 1990-2011 is exactly – 0.40 F degrees a decade.
The December trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.86 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 31 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, December Temperature, December temperature trend, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
22 november, 2011
As usual and as a complement to my previous post October U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.03 deg F / Decade, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent October US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature October 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.03 F / Decade
US temperature October 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.39 F / Decade
US temperature October 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
US temperature October 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.20 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 for October is exactly – 0.20 F degrees a decade. That is a – 2.0 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of Octobers ”accelerated warming” trend:
The October trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.39 F degrees a decade.
The October trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.16 F degrees a decade.
The October trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.20 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 31 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, October temperature, October temperature trend, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
21 november, 2011
The official October temperature figures are out. And it is down quite much compared with October last year – 1.01 F.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the September figures see my post:
September U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.07 deg F / Decade
For the August figures see my post:
August U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.12 deg F / Decade
October 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
October temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in October 2011 was 55.7 F. This was 0.9 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 33rd warmest October in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.03 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 0.3 F warmer in 100 years. The sweat is really breaking out! Put on the AC!
And as usual there are some wild swings from year to year. Which humankind somehow mysteriously survived without any catastrophe.
Notice the dramatic drop from 1924 to 1925. A drop of – 6.21 F degrees
And the dramatic rise from 1925 to 1926. A rise of 6.11 F degrees.
A total change of a whopping 12.32 F degrees in two years. Talking about a temperature roller coaster.
And notice the dramatic rise from 1946 to 1947. A rise of 5.59 F degrees.
And the dramatic drop from 1947 to 1948. A drop of – 5.6 F degrees.
Another temperature roller coaster that we somehow survived. A total change of a whopping 11.19 F degrees in two years.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and COOLING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And according to the “science” and “logic” of the Global Warming Hysterics humankind would have been killed 3 times over during these years. Especially in North America.
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rises and drop in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases/dropped 5 – 6 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 6.11 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
And an ACTUAL CHANGE OF 12.32 F degrees in two years is also nothing to bother about. Move on, NOTHING to see here.
So we can easily survive an actual change of temperature of 12.32 F degrees in two years. But a “predicted”, (by these “eminent” Global Warming Hysteric “scientists” and their models which cannot predict the weather one week from now), rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, October temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
9 november, 2011
And the cooling continues. Even on a regional level. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind everywhere. Move on, NOTHING to see here.
Here is the last part of my regional analysis of the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a regional perspective.
I wanted to see how the national trend is, or is not, mimicked in the 9 US climate regions. And how these regional decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And since the October temperature data are just out today I will do a quick comparison between the 10 months (year to date, January-October) data and compare it with the 9 months data.
Part 1 here:
Part 1: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Part 2 here:
Part 2: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Part 3 here:
Part 3: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So to summarize this evidence of this US regional “accelerated warming” trend:
North West (WA, OR and ID)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.39 F / Decade
West (CA and NV)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.38 F / Decade
West North Central (MT, NE, ND, SD and WY)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.19 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 2.08 F / Decade
Southwest (AZ, CO, NM and UT)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.18 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.84 F / Decade
South (AR, LA, KS, MS, OK and TX)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.01 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.19 F / Decade
East North Central (IA, MI, MN and WI)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.05 F / Decade
Central (IL, IN, KY, MO, OH, TN and WV)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.02 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.33 F / Decade
Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is – 0.03 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.26 F / Decade
Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)
The recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.09 F / Decade
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.83 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
As I said in the beginning the temperature data for October is just out today so I thought it would be really interesting to compare the new 10 month consecutive month trend for 111 years to the 9 month data in my posts.
So here is a quick comparison for the Trend/Decade for 1900-2011 (and this time I spare you all the graphs OK):
North West (WA, OR and ID)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER
West (CA and NV)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is none, it is the same.
West North Central (MT, NE, ND, SD and WY)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.17 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER
Southwest (AZ, CO, NM and UT)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.17 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.01 F COOLER
South (AR, LA, KS, MS, OK and TX)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.01 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is none, it is the same.
East North Central (IA, MI, MN and WI)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.09 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER
Central (IL, IN, KY, MO, OH, TN and WV)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.00 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER
Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is – 0.04 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.01 F COOLER
Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.07 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.02 F COOLER
And remember that this is the whole 10 month consecutive temperature Trend/ Decade for 111 years.
I don’t know about you, but I consider this 10 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And what was the difference between the 9 and 10 month Trend/Decade?
In 7 regions the COOLING increased and in 2 they stayed the same.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F in 100 years?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
And remember that there where two regions that had some warming during 2000-2011 (SE and NE). And that in reality it was a few states that were behind this warming in each region?
So I could not help myself but to include the new data for 2000-2011 (and I could not resist the graphs either):
Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.15 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.11 F COOLER
Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)
The recent 10 months (Jan-Oct) trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.80 F / Decade
The difference to the 9 months data is – 0.03 F COOLER
So the only two regions that had some warming during 2000-2011 are COOLING too.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really comfortable and warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” on a regional US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, Central region, Climate Change, Climate History, climate hysteria, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate regions, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, East North Central region, eminent treat to humankind, Florida, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Warming Hysteria, January-October U.S. Temperature, January-September U.S. Temperature, Karl and Koss, land use change factors, Maine, NASA, National Climatic Data Center, NCDC, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, NOAA, North West region, Northeast region, October temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 10 Months Temperature, Recent 10 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, region, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Regional Temperature trend, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, South Carolina, South region, Southeast region, Southwest region, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature from a regional perspective, Temperature history, temperature measurement, Temperature trend/decade, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S. Regional Temperature trend, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US climate regions, US high temperature, US low temperature, US Regional Temperature trend, USHCN, Vermont, Virginia, weather stations, West North Central region, West region
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
8 november, 2011
And the cooling continues. Even on a regional level. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind everywhere. Move on, NOTHING to see here.
Here is the third part of my regional analysis of the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a regional perspective.
To see how the national trend is, or is not, mimicked in the 9 US climate regions. And how these regional decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
Part 1 here:
Part 1: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Part 2 here:
Part 2: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that theUSstations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends for the third and last three regions:
Central (IL, IN, KY, MO, OH, TN and WV)
Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.02 F / Decade
Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.40 F / Decade
Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.36 F / Decade
Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.33 F / Decade
Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC and VA)
Southeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is – 0.03 F / Decade
Southeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.32 F / Decade
Southeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.35 F / Decade
Southeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.03 F / Decade
Southeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.26 F / Decade
Northeast (CR, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI and VT)
Northeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.09 F / Decade
Northeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.41 F / Decade
Northeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.43 F / Decade
Northeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.39 F / Decade
Northeast temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.83 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.).
As you can see this is a more mixed result, some cooling and some warming.
If we look at the 6 states in the Southeast region, it is only Virginia and to some part South Carolina that drives this value for the whole region. Florida for example has – 0.19 F trend/decade for the same period (2000-2011). And interestingly the trend for the last 111 years (1900 to 2011) is – 0.03 F / Decade for the whole region.
Also notice the swings between decades: 1980 to 2011 is 0.35 F, 1990 to 2011 is – 0.03 F and 2000 to 2011 is 0.26 F.
And if we look at the 9 states in the Northeast region it is in reality only four states that drive that temperature for the whole region – ME, DE, NJ and VT. For example New Hampshire, between Maine and Vermont does not have even half the value of the neighboring states.
Remember that NOAA /NCDC determined these 9 climate regions because they are:
“nine climatically consistent regions within the contiguous United States”.
There is not supposed to be wild swings and huge differencies in temperature trend/decade just because you pass to the neighbouring state a few a miles away. We are not talking about diffrence in temperatur over the day or week here, but temperature trend/decade within miles of each other.
Another reason to be “confident” in the “sience” behind the Global Warmin Hysteria wouldn’t you say?
But it is an interesting observation none the less.
And these states are geographically very small so I suspect that these huge differences within the same region (and between neighboring states) has more to do with the placement of stations, the urban heat island effect etc.
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.33 F, 0.26 F and 0.83 F degrees COOLER and warmer a decade for these 3 regions. That is a – 3.3 F, 2.6 F and 8.3 F COOLER and warmer in 100 years.
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The Central recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly – 0.33 F degrees a decade.
The Southeast recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly 0.26 F degrees a decade.
The Northeast recent 9 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly 0.83 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really comfortable and warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” on a regional US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Tomorrow the last part.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, Central region, Climate Change, Climate History, climate hysteria, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate regions, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, Florida, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Warming Hysteria, January-September U.S. Temperature, Karl and Koss, land use change factors, Maine, NASA, National Climatic Data Center, NCDC, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, NOAA, Northeast region, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, region, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Regional Temperature trend, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, South Carolina, Southeast region, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature from a regional perspective, Temperature history, temperature measurement, Temperature trend/decade, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S. Regional Temperature trend, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US climate regions, US high temperature, US low temperature, US Regional Temperature trend, USHCN, Vermont, Virginia, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
7 november, 2011
And the cooling continues. Even on a regional level. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind everywhere. Move on, NOTHING to see here.
Here is the second part of my regional analysis of the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a regional perspective.
To see how the national trend is, or is not, mimicked in the 9 US climate regions. And how these regional decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
Part 1 here:
Part 1: Recent 9 Months U.S. Regional Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends for the second three regions:
Southwest (AZ, CO, NM and UT)
Southwest temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.18 F / Decade
Southwest temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.64 F / Decade
Southwest temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.47 F / Decade
Southwest temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.27 F / Decade
Southwest temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.84 F / Decade
South (AR, LA, KS, MS, OK and TX)
South temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.01 F / Decade
South temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.42 F / Decade
South temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.39 F / Decade
South temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.35 F / Decade
South temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.19 F / Decade
East North Central (IA, MI, MN and WI)
East North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.11 F / Decade
East North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.41 F / Decade
East North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.06 F / Decade
East North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.14 F / Decade
East North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.05 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.84 F, – 0.19 F and – 1.05 F degrees COOLER a decade for these 3 regions. That is a whopping – 18.4 F, – 1.9 F and– 10.5 F COOLER in 100 years. The freezer next!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F in 100 years?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The Southwest recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly – 1.84 F degrees a decade.
The South recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly – 0.19 F degrees a decade.
The East North Central recent 9 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.05 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really comfortable and warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” on a regionalUSstyle.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, Arizona, Arkansas, average temperature, Climate Change, Climate History, climate hysteria, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate regions, climate stations, Colorado, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, East North Central region, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Warming Hysteria, Iowa, January-September U.S. Temperature, Kansas, Karl and Koss, land use change factors, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, NASA, National Climatic Data Center, NCDC, New Mexico, NOAA, Oklahoma, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, region, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Regional Temperature trend, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, South region, Southwest region, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature from a regional perspective, Temperature history, temperature measurement, Temperature trend/decade, Texas, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S. Regional Temperature trend, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US climate regions, US high temperature, US low temperature, US Regional Temperature trend, USHCN, Utah, weather stations, Wisconsin
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 6 Comments »
6 november, 2011
And the cooling continues. Even on a regional level. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind everywhere.
As a complement to my previous post Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – 7.8 F COOLER in 100 years, and while waiting for the October figures, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a regional perspective. To see how the national trend is, or is not, mimicked in the 9 US climate regions. And how these regional decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that theUSstations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
NOAA and NCDC define the 9 US regions like this:
“Through climate analysis, National Climatic Data Center scientists have identified nine climatically consistent regions within the contiguous United States which are useful for putting current climate anomalies into a historical perspective (Karl and Koss, 1984).”
So here are the trends for the first three regions:
North West (WA, OR and ID)
North West temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.13 F / Decade
North West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.41 F / Decade
North West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.24 F / Decade
North West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.41 F / Decade
North West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.39 F / Decade
West (CA and NV)
West temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.39 F / Decade
West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.07 F / Decade
West temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.38 F / Decade
West North Central (MT, NE, ND, SD and WY)
West North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.19 F / Decade
West North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.30 F / Decade
West North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is – 0.11 F / Decade
West North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.21 F / Decade
West North Central temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 2.08 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 2.08 F, – 1.38 F and – 1.39 F degrees COOLER a decade for these 3 regions. That is a whopping – 20.8 F, – 13.8 F and – 13.9 F COOLER in 100 years. The DEEP freezer next!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F in 100 years?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The North West recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly – 1.39 F degrees a decade.
The West recent 9 months trend 2000 -2011 is exactly – 1.38 F degrees a decade.
The West North Central recent 9 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 2.08 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really, really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” on a regional US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, California, Climate Change, Climate History, climate hysteria, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate regions, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Warming Hysteria, Idaho, January-September U.S. Temperature, Karl and Koss, land use change factors, Montana, NASA, National Climatic Data Center, NCDC, Nebraska, Nevada, NOAA, North Dakota, North West region, Oregon, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Regional Temperature trend, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, South Dakota, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature from a regional perspective, Temperature history, temperature measurement, Temperature trend/decade, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S. Regional Temperature trend, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US climate regions, US high temperature, US low temperature, US Regional Temperature trend, USHCN, Washington, weather stations, West North Central region, West region, Wyoming
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
9 oktober, 2011
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post September U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 9 months (year to date, January-September) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider a 9 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan-Sep) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.13 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.48 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.36 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.17 F / Decade
US temperature recent 9 months (Jan- Sep) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.78 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.78 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 7.8 F COOLER in 100 years. The freezer next!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme increase” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is actually cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 9 months trend 1970-2011 is exactly 0.48 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.36 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.17 F degrees a decade.
The recent 9 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.78 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, January-August U.S. Temperature, January-September U.S. Temperature, land use change factors, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 9 Months Temperature, Recent 9 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
9 oktober, 2011
As usual and as a complement to my previous post September U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.07 deg F / Decade, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent September US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature September 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.07 F / Decade
US temperature September 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.61 F / Decade
US temperature September 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.46 F / Decade
US temperature September 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.35 F / Decade
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 for September is exactly 0.35 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 3.5 F warmer in 100 years. Take cover!
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of Septembers ”accelerated warming” trend:
The September trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.61 F degrees a decade.
The September trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.46 F degrees a decade.
The September trend 2000-2011 is exactly 0.35 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 31 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
9 oktober, 2011
The official September temperature figures are out. And it is down a little: – 0.16 deg F compared with September last year.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that theUSstations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the August figures see my post:
August U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.12 deg F / Decade
September 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
September temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in September 2011 was 66.9 F. This was 1.5 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 21st warmest September in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.07 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 0.7 F warmer in 100 years. The sweat is really breaking out!
And as usual there are some wild swings from year to year. Which humankind somehow mysteriously survived without any catastrophe.
Notice the rise from 1918 to 1919. A rise of 7.93 F degrees.
And the dramatic drop from 1917 to 1918. A drop of – 4.46 F degrees.
A total change of a whopping 12.39 F degrees in two years. Talking about a temperature roller coaster.
And notice the dramatic rise from 1985 to 1986. A rise of 8.36 F degrees.
And the dramatic drop from 1911 to 1912. A drop of – 8.07 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and COOLING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And according to the “science” and “logic” of the Global Warming Hysterics humankind would have been killed 3 times over during these years. Especially in North America.
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rises and drop in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 5 – 7 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 8.36 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
And an ACTUAL CHANGE OF 12.39 F degrees in two years is also is nothing to bother about.
So we can easily survive an actual change of temperature of 12.39 F degrees in two years. But a “predicted”, (by these “eminent” Global Warming Hysteric “scientists” and their models which cannot predict the weather one week from now), rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:adjustment, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, huge smoothing radius, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, September temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, trend per decade, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
17 september, 2011
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post August U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 8 months (year to date, January-August) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
I don’t know about you, but I consider an 8 month consecutive month trend 111 years long to be a “quit good” indicator.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that theUSstations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan-Aug) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.14 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan-Aug) 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.47 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan-Aug) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.31 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan-Aug) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.10 F / Decade
US temperature recent 8 months (Jan-Aug) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.02 F / Decade
Do you notice the “accelerated warming” trend from 1970-2011 to 2000-2011??
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.02 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 10.2 F COOLER in 100 years. The freezer next!
And this is also the decade that the Global Warming Hysterics have been screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to scare us to death, about the catastrophic treat that the “extreme rinsing” in temperature is to mankind and earth.
This is a perfect example of what I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And all of this to “save” the Earth from a “catastrophic warming” when it is ACTUALLY cooling.
And the most absurd thing is that all the things that the “intelligent” politicians and the so called “scientists”, with the willing help of mainstream media, have forced through at EXTREME cost to us, are actually helping to accelerate the cooling.
Talking about an eminent treat to humankind!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 8 months trend 1970-2011 is exactly 0.47 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.31 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.10 F degrees a decade.
The recent 8 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.02 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer looks really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:August temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, January-August U.S. Temperature, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 8 Months Temperature, Recent 8 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
17 september, 2011
As usual and as a complement to my previous post August U.S. Temperature – The trend is 0.12 deg F / Decade, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent August US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 41 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature August 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.12 F/Decade
US temperature August 1970-2011
The trend for 1970 to 2011 is 0.48 F/Decade
US temperature August 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.45 F/Decade
US temperature August 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.81 F/Decade
US temperature August 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.18 F/Decade
Noticing the “accelerated warming” trend??
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
Or as Obi-Wan so aptly put it: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for – Move along.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of Augusts “accelerated warming” trend:
The August trend 1970-2011 is exactly 0.48 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.45 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.81 F degrees a decade.
The August trend 2000-2011 is exactly 0.18 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 41 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
And interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:August temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | Leave a Comment »
16 september, 2011
The official August temperature figures are out. And it is up.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that theUSstations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the May figures see my post:
May U.S. Temperature – 5.39 F cooler than the warmest May
For the April figures see my post:
April U.S. Temperature – 3.37 F cooler than the warmest April
For the March figures see my post:
March U.S. Temperature – 6.6 F cooler than the warmest March
For the February figures see my post:
February U.S. Temperature – 8.26 F cooler than the warmest February
For the January figures see my post:
January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January
Where you also have links to the other months
For the 2010 figures see my post (where you have links to all US temperature posts):
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
For longer trends:
Recent 3 Months (Mar-May) U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – – 18.7 F COOLER in 100 years
Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler 2
Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting Cooler and Cooler
See also my figure for cities, state and regional here:
Temperature Trend/Decade for the 4 Largest U.S. Cities – It is getting Cooler and Cooler
California’s “hot spell”
Texas Cold’em
Catastrophic Climate Change – All human activity ceased in Florida and Georgia!
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
Aug 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
August temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in August 2011 was 75.7 F. This was 3.0 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 2nd warmest August in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade.”
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.12 F degrees a decade. The same as in May and April. That is a whopping 1.2 F warmer in 100 years. The sweat is really breaking out!
And as usual there are some wild swings from year to year. Which humankind somehow mysteriously survived without any catastrophe.
Notice the rise from 1982 to 1983. A rise of 3.07 F degrees.
And the dramatic drop from 2003 to 2004. A drop of – 4.49 F degrees.
And notice the dramatic rise from 1946 to 1947. A rise of 3 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and COOLING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And some years there was a temperature roller coaster.
From 2003 to 2004 the August temperature dropped by – 4.49 F degrees.
And from 2004 to 2005 a dramatic rise of 3.06 F degrees.
A total change of a whopping 7.55 F degrees in two years.
And according to the “science” and “logic” of the Global Warming Hysterics humankind would have been killed 2 times over during these years. Especially in North America.
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rises and drop in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 3– 3.5 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 3.07 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
And an ACTUAL CHANGE OF 7.55 F degrees in two years is also is nothing to bother about.
So we can easily survive an actual change of temperature of 7.55 F degrees in two years. But a “predicted”, (by these “eminent” Global Warming Hysteric “scientists” and their models which cannot predict the weather one week from now), rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:August temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
15 juni, 2011
And the cooling continues. Sorry – I mean that Global Warming is an imminent treat to humankind.
As a complement to my previous post Recent 3 Months (Mar-May) U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 5 months (year to date, January-May) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan-May) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan-May) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.25 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan-May) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.32 F / Decade
US temperature recent 5 months (Jan-May) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.87 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.87 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 18.7 F COOLER in 100 years. The freezer next!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 5 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.25 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly – 0.32 F degrees a decade.
The recent 5 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.87 F degrees a decade.
So the “warming” trend is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Some more “rapid warming” like this and the freezer look really warm.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, May temperature, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 5 Months Temperature, Recent 5 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
14 juni, 2011
As usual and as a complement to my previous post May U.S. Temperature – 5.39 F cooler than the warmest May, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent 3 months (March-May) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
See also my figure for cities, state and regional here:
Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler
Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler 2
Temperature Trend/Decade for the 4 Largest U.S. Cities – It is getting Cooler and Cooler
Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting Cooler and Cooler
California’s “hot spell”
Texas Cold’em
Catastrophic Climate Change – All human activity ceased in Florida and Georgia!
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 3 months (Mar-May) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.13 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Mar-May) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.26 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Mar-May) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.16 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Mar-May) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.03 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.03 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 10.3 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
Even worse, “our” politicians, “scientists”, journalists” and the mainstream medias attitude is: Move on, NOTHING to see here.
Or as Obi-Wan so aptly put it: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for – Move along.
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 3 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.26 Fdegrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.16 Fdegrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.03 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind! Especially during the last 31 years.
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, March.May US temperature, May temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
14 juni, 2011
The official May temperature figures are out.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the April figures see my post:
April U.S. Temperature – 3.37 F cooler than the warmest April
For the March figures see my post:
March U.S. Temperature – 6.6 F cooler than the warmest March
For the February figures see my post:
February U.S. Temperature – 8.26 F cooler than the warmest February
For the January figures see my post:
January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January
Where you also have links to the other months
For the 2010 figures see my post (where you have links to allUStemperature posts):
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
May 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
May temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in May 2011 was 60.0 F. This was -1.0 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 25th coolest May in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade.”
This year, the May temperature is – 5.39 F cooler than 1934, the warmest May. And if we compare this year’s May with 2000 it is – 4.09 F cooler.
If we compare with 1936 this year’s May is – 4.17 F cooler. And if we compare with 1987 is – 3.98 F cooler.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.12 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 1.2 F warmer in 100 years. The sweat is breaking out!
And notice the rise from 1933 to 1934. A rise of 4.77 F degrees.
And the dramatic drop from 1934 to 1935. A drop of – 7.38 F degrees.
And the dramatic rise from 1935 to 1936. A rise of 6.16 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and COLING and an eminent treat to humankind!
So to summarize these three years:
From 1933 to1934 the May temperature rose 4.77 F degrees.
And from 1934 to 1935 it dropped by – 7.38 F degrees.
And from 1935 to 1936 a dramatic rise of 6.16 F degrees.
Talking about a temperature roller coaster!
A total change of a whopping 18.31 F degrees in three years.
And according to the “science” and “logic” of the Global Warming Hysterics humankind would have been killed 3 times over during these years. Especially in North America.
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rises and drop in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 5 – 6.1 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 6.16 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
And an ACTUAL CHANGE OF 18.31 Fdegrees in three years is also nothing to bother about.
So we can easily survive an actual change of temperature of 18.31 F degrees in three years. But a “predicted”, (by these “eminent” Global Warming Hysteric “scientists” and their models which cannot predict the weather one week from now), rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, May temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
15 maj, 2011
As a complement to my previous post Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler 2, and Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler, I thought I also would look at the recent 12 months (May-April) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 12 months (May-Apr) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.12F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (May-Apr) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.34 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (May-Apr) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.28 F / Decade
US temperature recent 12 months (May-Apr) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.50 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.50 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 5.0 F COOLER in 100 years. Brrr!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 12 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly0.34 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.28 F degrees a decade.
The recent 12 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.50 F degrees a decade.
And remember, the latest 3 Month “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.44 F degrees COOLER a decade.
And the latest 6 Month “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.64 F degrees COOLER a decade.
So the “warming trend” is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:April temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, May-April US temperature, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 12 Months Temperature, Recent 12 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
14 maj, 2011
As a complement to my previous post Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature trend/decade – It is getting cooler and cooler 2, I thought it also would be interesting to look at the recent 6 months (November-April) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 6 months (Nov-Apr) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.15 F / Decade
US temperature recent 6 months (Nov-Apr) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.30 F / Decade
US temperature recent 6 months (Nov-Apr) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is 0.07 F / Decade
US temperature recent 6 months (Nov-Apr) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.64 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.64 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 6.4 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 6 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.30 F degrees a decade.
The recent 6 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly 0.07 F degrees a decade.
The recent 6 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.64 F degrees a decade.
And remember, the latest 3 Month “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.44 F degrees COOLER a decade.
So the “warming trend” is really accelerating wouldn’t you say.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:April temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, NASA, NCDC, November-April US temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, Recent 6 Months Temperature, Recent 6 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
14 maj, 2011
As a complement to my previous post April U.S. Temperature – 3.37 F cooler than the warmest April, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent 3 months (February-April) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 3 months (Feb-Apr) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.19 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Feb-Apr) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.18 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Feb-Apr) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.40 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Feb-Apr) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.44 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.44 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 14.4 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 3 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.18 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly – 0.40 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.44 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:April temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February-April US temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
14 maj, 2011
The official April temperature figures are out.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the March figures see my post:
March U.S. Temperature – 6.6 F cooler than the warmest March
For the February figures see my post:
February U.S. Temperature – 8.26 F cooler than the warmest February
For the January figures see my post:
January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January
Where you also have links to the other months
For the 2010 figures see my post (where you have links to allUStemperature posts):
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
See also my figure for cities, state and regional here:
Temperature Trend/Decade for the 4 Largest U.S. Cities – It is getting Cooler and Cooler
California’s “hot spell”
Texas Cold’em
Catastrophic Climate Change – All human activity ceased in Florida and Georgia!
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
April 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
April temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in April 2011 was 52.9 F. This was 0.9 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 39th warmest April in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the April temperature is – 3.37 F cooler than 2006, the warmest April. And if we compare this year’s April with 1981 it is – 3.26 F cooler.
If we compare with 1946 this year’s April is – 2.62 F cooler. And if we compare with 1915 is – 2.63 F cooler.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.12 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 1.2 F warmer in 100 years. Take cover!
And notice the dramatic rise from 1907 to 1908. A rise of 5.24 F degrees.
And the dramatic rise from 1975 to 1975. A rise of 5.05 F degrees.
Or the rise from 1909 to 1910. A rise of 4.79 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rise in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 4.5 – 5.0 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 5.24 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:April temperature, average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
12 april, 2011
I have written before on the largest states and on regional temperature trends. So therefore I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent 3 months (January-March) temperature from a “historic” perspective for the 4 largest cities.
New York (8,175,133), Los Angeles (3,792,621), Chicago (2,695,598) and Houston (2,099,451). All population figures from the 2010 census.
Especially to see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 31 years. The period that according to the Global Warming Hysterics and computer models they worship should show a steady and accelerated increase in temperature.
These four cities also are very well geographically spread over the country which means the data is even more interesting.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
Another point to remember is that these data are from big cities. This means big Urban Heat island effect. The very obvious effect that it is warmer in the middle of big cities compared to the suburbs. And even more so compared to the countryside outside city limits.
This UHI effect on official temperature data has always been denied by the Global Warming Hysterics. And they have done their best to “adjust”, “tweak” or “reconstruct” the data to hide that effect. So that it doesn’t need to be accounted for in the “official data”.
So keep that in mind when you see the data below. This is the warmest of the warmest – temperature data from inside big cities.
I have written extensively about the UHI effect, see for example my posts:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 60
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 222
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 223
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 243
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 268
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 269
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 342
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 354
How the world temperature “record” was manipulated through HUGE smoothing radius
How the world temperature “record” was manipulated through dropping of stations
Here is a good picture shoving the UHI effect
And here is a picture of an actual measurement in Reno, NV October 28, 2008. Shoving the Urban Heat island effect very clearly.
And remember this effect does not exist according to the Global Warming Hysterics. And does not in ANY SHAPE OR FORM affect the “official” temperature “records” according to them.
So here are the trends:
New York temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.73 F / Decade
New York temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.30 F / Decade
New York temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 0.72 F / Decade
Wouldn’t you say that this is a prime example of rapid warming? Urban Heat island effect and all?
Los Angeles temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is – 0.27 F / Decade
Los Angeles temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.15 F / Decade
Los Angeles temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is 0.35 F / Decade
Some warming here. Interestingly the trend for the entire period (1944 to 2011) is0.51 F / Decade
Chicago temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.63 F / Decade
Chicago temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 1.50 F / Decade
Chicago temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 2.97 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 2.97 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 29.7 F COOLER in 100 years. Warm yourself!
Wouldn’t you say that this is a prime example of rapid warming? Urban Heat island effect and all?
But nothing to see here – Move On – You need to worry about the Predicted rise of 3- 4 F according to the computer models. Take no notice of the Actual trend. Trust us!
Houston temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.88 F / Decade
Houston temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.12 F / Decade
Houston temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.27 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.27 F degrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 12.7 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
Wouldn’t you say that this is a prime example of rapid warming? Urban Heat island effect and all?
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And remember, this is the official data from the warmest of the warmest – temperature data from inside big cities.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not these ACTUAL trends?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
New York trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 0.72 F degrees a decade
Los Angeles trend 2000-2011 is exactly 0.36 F degrees a decade.
Chicago trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 2.97 F degrees a decade.
Houston trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.27 F degrees a decade.
Another telling example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, Chicago, Chicago temperature trend, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, CO2, computer models, Continental U.S., cool the past, Cooler, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, Houston, Houston temperature trend, January-March US temperature, Klimatmodeller, land use change factors, Los Angeles, Los Angeles temperature trend, March temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, New York, New York temperature trend, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Reno, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, Urban Heat island effect, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
11 april, 2011
As a complement to my previous post March U.S. Temperature – 6.6 F cooler than the warmest March, I thought it would be interesting to look at the recent 3 months (January-March) US temperature from a “historic” perspective. To see how the decade trends have evolved during the last 111 years. Especially during the last 31 years.
And as I always point out:
Remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So here are the trends:
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1900-2011
The trend for 1900 to 2011 is 0.18 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1980-2011
The trend for 1980 to 2011 is 0.3 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 1990-2011
The trend for 1990 to 2011 is – 0.66 F / Decade
US temperature recent 3 months (Jan-Mar) 2000-2011
The trend for 2000 to 2011 is – 1.99 F / Decade
So the “warming trend” 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.99 Fdegrees COOLER a decade. That is a whopping – 19.9 F COOLER in 100 years. Take cover!
According to the computer models that the Global Warming Hysterics love so much, worship and blindly follows (especially our intelligent politicians), it should be EXACTLY the opposite.
And we are supposed to be very worried about a predicted rise of 3-4 F?
But not this ACTUAL trend?
And for this predicted trend the politicians want to take our societies back to the Stone Age. But, as usual, they DO NOTHING about the actual trend.
So to summarize this evidence of this “accelerated warming” trend:
The recent 3 months trend 1980-2011 is exactly 0.3 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 1990-2011 is exactly – 0.66 F degrees a decade.
The recent 3 months trend 2000-2011 is exactly – 1.99 F degrees a decade.
Another brilliant and glorious example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
That is truly “Global Warming” US style.
An interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, January-March US temperature, land use change factors, March temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 3 Months Temperature, Recent 3 Months U.S. Temperature, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 2 Comments »
10 april, 2011
The official March temperature figures are out.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations is back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the February figures see my post:
February U.S. Temperature – 8.26 F cooler than the warmest February
For the January figures see my post:
January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January
For the 2010 figures see my post (where you have links to all US temperature posts):
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
See also my state and regional figures here:
California’s “hot spell”
Texas Cold’em
Catastrophic Climate Change – All human activity ceased in Florida and Georgia!
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
March 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit their agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
March temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in March 2011 was 44.0 F. This was 1.4 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 39th warmest March in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit per decade.”
This year, the March temperature is – 6.6 F cooler than 1910, the warmest March. And if we compare this year’s March with 2007 it is – 4.49 F cooler.
If we compare with 1946 this year’s March is – 3.96 F cooler. And if we compare with 1921 is – 3.64 F cooler.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.16 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 1.6 F warmer in 100 years. Take cover!
And notice the dramatic rise from 1906 to 1907. A rise of 9.47 F degrees.
And the dramatic rise from 1910 to 1911. A rise of 9.07 F degrees.
Or the rise from 1960 to 1961. A rise of 7.69 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rise in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 6.77 – 7.52 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 9.5 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter</a>, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, March temperature, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, US low temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
13 mars, 2011
As a complement to my previous post February U.S. Temperature – 8.26 F cooler than the warmest February I thought it would be interesting to look at large state, in this case California, the third largest state with an area 423,970 km2 (163,695.57sq mi). And the biggest when it comes to population (37,253,956 April 2010).
California is the same size as Iraq. And is much bigger than Japan and Germany.
As I always point out:
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
California February temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in February 2011 was 45.0 F. This was -2.6 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 20th coolest February in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the February temperature is – 8.7 F cooler than 1963, the warmest February. And if we compare this year’s February with 1991 it is – 8.2 F cooler. If we compare with1924/1907 this year’s February is – 7.9 F cooler. And if we compare with 1980 is – 6 F cooler
This February is – 2.63 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.08 F degrees a decade. That is a whopping 0.8 F warmer in 100 years. Take cover!
And notice the dramatic rise from 1933 to 1934. A rise of 8.6 F degrees.
Another big rise from 1962 to 1963. A rise of 7.9 F degrees. Followed by nearly as a big drop 1964. A drop of – 7.6 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And California did not cease to exist because of this “catastrophic” rise in temperature as the Global Warming Hysterics want us to believe.
Nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
Interesting wouldn’t you say?
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 6.6 – 8.3 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, California went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 8.6 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
California recent 3 months (Dec-Feb) 1900-2011
This year, the Dec- Feb temperature is – 3.1 F cooler than 1981, the warmest Dec- Feb. And if we compare this year’s Dec- Feb with 2006 and 1995 it is – 1.5 F cooler.
If we compare with 1970,1963,1959, 1924 and 1907 this year’s is – 1.4 F cooler. And if we compare with 1940 it is – 1.7 F cooler
This recent 3 months is 0.46 F warmer than the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.08 F degrees a decade.
California recent 12 months (Mar-Feb) 1900-2011
This year, the Mar – Feb temperature is – 1.9 F cooler than 1927, the warmest Mar – Feb. And if we compare this year’s Mar – Feb with 1905 it is – 1.7 F cooler.
If we compare with 1997 this year is – 1.8 F cooler. And if we compare with 2009 and 1902 it is – 1.4 F cooler
This recent 12months is – 0.03 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.09 F degrees a decade.
Notice how the “warming” increases:
The February “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.08 F degrees a decade.
The Dec- Feb “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.08 F degrees a decade.
The Mar – Feb “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly 0.09 F degrees a decade.
That is truly “Global Warming” Californian style.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, California, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Cold'em, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, February temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 12 months, Recent 3 months, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, State temperature, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trend, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
10 mars, 2011
The official February temperature figures are out. And the cooling continues – Sorry this should of course be that the rapid warming continues in an accelerated pace.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the January figures see my post:
January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January Where you also have links to the other months
For the 2010 figures see my post:
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
February 2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
February temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in February 2011 was 34.0 F. This was – 0.6 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 51st coolest February in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.3 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the February temperature is – 8.26 F cooler than 1954, the warmest February And if we compare this year’s February with 1930 it is – 6.92 F cooler. If we compare with 2000 this year’s February is – 6.59 F cooler. And if we compare with 1992 is – 6.48 F cooler
This February is – 0.66 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And notice the dramatic rise from 1929 to 1930. A rise of 13.12 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And we all know what happened – USA ceased to exist because of this catastrophic rise in temperature.
Except it didn’t – nothing happened. Everything went on as normal.
Well sort of, you had of course the Wall Street crash in late 1929. So now I am only waiting for the Global Warming Hysterics to blame that TOO on “Global Warming” since they have blamed EVERYTHING, and I mean EVERYTHING, on that. From camel deaths to staff shortages in brothels struggle (See for example my post: Orsaken till ALLT elände i världen! ”The cause of ALL misery in the world” and Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 201).
There are other years in the chart when the temperature increases 6.77 – 7.76 F in one year. And still, somehow mysteriously, USA went on as normal.
So a “predicted” rise of 3- 4 F degrees in 100 years is a total catastrophe for humankind.
But an ACTUAL RISE OF 13.2 F degrees IN ONE YEAR is nothing.
Interesting ”science” wouldn’t you say.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, eminent treat to humankind, February temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 8 Comments »
15 februari, 2011
As a continuation of my previous post How the world temperature “record” was manipulated through dropping of stations I will continue my expose of official ways to manipulate data. This time about the smoothing radius.
It sounds like a very boring technical detail, and it is, but it plays an important part in the official manipulation of the temperature record. Others have shown this before and done a very good job presenting it. But it is worth repeating because most people have no idea on what shaky grounds the temperature records are based.
I have written extensively on this blog about the tweaking, “adjustment” and manipulation of the historic and present temperature “record” which are presented in the official figures.
With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations around 1990 – roughly 63 % of all climate measuring stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
So what is a “smoothing radius”? And why is it so important?
A smoothing radius is: EVERYTHING within 1200 km in ALL directions from the weather station IS GIVEN THE SAME TEMPERATURE AS AT THE STATION!
Regardless of facts, geography and data.
Here is the official description: “Smoothing radius: Distance over which a station influences regional temperature.”
This is of course a VERY HANDY tool. First you drop most of the measuring stations. And the one you chose and keep are very strategically placed. Then you let the stations you ”kept” decide, or as they so nicely put it “influence” the temperature within a radius of 1200 km.
Now you can influence and “control” the official world temperature “record”.
And remember –This dropping of stations was done on purpose. And what “happened” to the temperature after that – the temperature went up sharply.
Hmnnn??
Can there be a connection???
To recapitulate:
In 3 years, from 1989 to 1992, 5218 stations were purposely “dropped”.
From 1993 to 2000 1384 more stations were “dropped”. A total of 6602 stations.
And if we compare with 1970 with1992 8445 stations have been “dropped”.
If we compare 1970 with year 2000 9829 stations have been “dropped”.
And remember – Nearly ALL OF THESE STATIONS ARE STILL THERE AND GENERATING DATA.
This is the ”logic and science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
So let’s look at the difference so you can understand why this “technicality” plays such a big role:
1200 km (745.7 miles) smoothing
250 km (155.3 miles) smoothing
Noticing any difference?
The difference is HUGE and VERY revealing.
See ALL these grey areas that “suddenly appears” in the 250 km one? These huge areas of the globe which are grey are the ones where they don’t have ANY DATA. (I.e. the data is there but they don’t use it since dropping of ALL these stations).
That is also why they always “officially” use the 1200 km smoothing in their graphics.
So that you wouldn’t know that Antarctica, Arctic, HUGE PARTS of Africa and Asia is NOT covered in “their measurements”.
Also notice, and this is VERY TYPICAL of them, that ALL these parts that ARE NOT COVERED ARE ALL VERY RED (i.e. very hot).
Do you think this is by coincidence?
And what does that says about the “science” behind this?
And also remember that a 250 km smoothing in it self is VERY large.
If you could use a 100 km smoothing you would see EVEN more parts of the world in grey – i.e. there is no data.
This is the ”logic and science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
To show you how ABSURD a 1200 km (745.7 miles) smoothing is if used in ANY “scientific” way or shape or form, I am going to give you 3 examples.
Stockholm.
If the weather station is placed in Stockholm (Sweden) the temperature there would be given to Moscow, Amsterdam, Berlin, Warszawa, Kiev, Oslo, Helsinki and Prague etc.
You see how TOTALLY ABSURD THIS IS.
Paris.
If the weather station is placed in Paris (France) the temperature there would be given to London, Amsterdam, Berlin, Madrid, Rome, Dublin, Budapest and Prague etc.
You see how TOTALLY ABSURD THIS IS.
Denver.
If the weather station is placed in Denver(Colorado) the temperature there would be given to Las Vegas (NV), Phoenix (AR), over the border to Canada and Mexico, St Louis (IL), Minneapolis (MN) and Dallas (TX) etc.
You see how TOTALLY ABSURD THIS IS.
That’s why “officially” the high Bolivian Andes can have a “record warm” when the temperature is actually measured 1200 km away at the beaches in Peru. Or in the jungles of Brazil.
There has not been any thermometer data in GHCN since 1990 from Bolivia.
None. Nada. Zilch. Nothing. Empty Set.
So just how can it be so Hot Hot Hot! in Bolivia if there is NO data?
Easy. GIStemp “makes it up” from “nearby” thermometers up to 1200 km away.
“The official excuse given is that the data acceptance window closes on one day of the month and Bolivia does not report until after that date. Oh, and they never ever would want to go back and add date into the past after a close date. Yet they are happy to fiddle with, adjust, modify, and wholesale change and delete old data as they change their adjustment methods…”
The same goes on in the Arctic.
And the Antarctic.
And over huge parts of Africa.
And over huge parts of Asia.
And over huge parts of Latin America.
And over the oceans which make up 70% of the surface of earth.
So to sum up the “science” behind the “Global Temperature Record”:
It doesn’t cover 70% of the surface, Antarctic, Arctic, huge parts of Africa, huge parts of Asia and huge parts of Latin America.
Besides that everything is just fine.
Another brilliant example of the trustworthiness of the Global Warming Hysteria.
And “their science”.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:1200 km smoothing radius, 250 km smoothing radius, a political agenda, adjustment, Africa, Antarctic, Arctic, Asia, Bolivia, Climate Change, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, cooler than the average, CRN, Denver, Departure from normal, dropping of stations, Edward R. Long, Florida, Florida temperature, Georgia, Georgia temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Record, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteri, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, Hansen, historical record, homemade statistical method, homogenization, Joe D’Aleo, Journalism, land use change factors, Latin America, Mainstream media, manipulation, measurement biases, measuring stations, Media, Menne adjustment methodology, Menne-transformed, MSM, NASA, NCDC, New England, News, NOAA, oceans, Paris, Patrick Frank, poor placement of stations, Press, quality control, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, SPPI, Steve McIntyre, Stockholm, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Traditional Media, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations, World temperature
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 1 Comment »
15 februari, 2011
(Sorry, I could not resist the pun).
As a complement to my previous post January U.S. Temperature – 9.74 F cooler than the warmest January I thought it would be interesting to look at large state, in this case Texas, the second largest state with an area of 695,621 km2 (268,580.82 sq mi).
Texas is bigger than France, Afghanistan, and Ukraine etc. And is double the size of Germany.
As I always point out:
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
Texas January temperature 1900-2011
This year, the January temperature is – 10.3 F cooler than 1923, the warmest January. And if we compare this year’s January with 1998 it is – 5.9 F cooler.
If we compare with1952 this year’s January is – 9.1 F cooler. And if we compare with 1911 is – 9.3 F cooler
This January is – 1.58 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.14 F degrees a decade.
And notice the dramatic drop from 2006 to 2007. A drop of – 10.1 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
Texas recent 3 months (Nov-Jan) 1900-2011
This year, the Nov – Jan temperature is – 5 F cooler than 1923, the warmest Nov – Jan. And if we compare this year’s Nov – Jan with 1907 and 1934 it is – 3.7 F cooler.
If we compare with 2006 this year’s is – 2.7 F cooler. And if we compare with 2000 it is – 3 F cooler
This recent 3 months is nearly exactly as the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.06 F degrees a decade.
Texas recent 12 months (Feb-Jan) 1900-2011
This year, the Feb – Jan temperature is – 5 F cooler than 1923, the warmest Feb – Jan. And if we compare this year’s Feb – Jan with 1907 and 1934 it is – 3.7 F cooler.
If we compare with2006 this year’s January is – 2.7 F cooler. And if we compare with 2000 is – 3 F cooler
This recent 12months is – 0.09 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And the “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.01 F degrees a decade.
Notice how the “warming” increases:
The January “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.14 F degrees a decade.
The Nov – Jan “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.06 F degrees a decade.
The Feb – Jan “warming trend” 1900-2011 is exactly – 0.01 F degrees a decade.
That is truly “Global Warming” Texas style.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Cold'em, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, January temperature, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, Recent 12 months, Recent 3 months, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, State temperature, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Texas, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trend, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 5 Comments »
14 februari, 2011
The official January temperature figures are out. And the cooling continues – Sorry this should of course be that the rapid warming continues in an accelerated pace.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the 2010 figures see my post:
2010 U.S.Temperature is -1.32F Cooler than the Warmest Year
For the December figures see my post:
December Temperature Continental U.S. -5.45 F cooler than the warmest December
For the November figures see my post:
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
For the May figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 366
For the April figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 365
For the March figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 357
For the February figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 347
For the January figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 287
For the December figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 207
January2011 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
It is always ”fascinating” to see the huge difference between the national level when you compare it to the regional picture. Especially if you see the bright red areas in the official “Departure from normal” January picture above. Which covers the WHOLE western, and parts of central and eastern USA.
It looks very dramatic doesn’t it?
If you contrast that with the regional one, remember this is from the same people and the same “official data”; the difference is HUGE to say the least.
Ehhh? Where did these huge red areas of North West, West North Central and Northeast go???
You would think that huge bright red spots on a national level would be EVEN more dramatic on a regional level.
But they ARE GONE –zip, nada, nothing.
We are REALLY FACING EXTINCTION ARE WE NOT?
And Northeast with a “warming trend” of exactly – 0.03 F degrees a decade??
Whoa – Take cover! Armageddon is here.
And this is nothing new, it happens time and again. See for example my post:
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit there agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.).
January temperature 1900-2011
“The average temperature in January 2011 was 30.0 F. This was -0.8 F cooler than the 1900-2000 (20th century) average, the 37th coolest January in 117 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the January temperature is – 9.74 F cooler than 2006, the warmest January. And if we compare this year’s January with 1998 it is – 5.67 F cooler.
If we compare with1953 this year’s January is – 7.23 F cooler. And if we compare with 1900 is – 4.91 F cooler
This January is – 1.05 F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2011.
And notice the dramatic drop from 2006 to 2007. A drop of – 8.05 F degrees.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And take a look at this interesting graph:
US State High Temperature Record by Decade
66% of ALL State High Temperature Records are PRIOR to 1940.
Don’t you see the rapid warming there?
Another brilliant example of RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
(The graph is from a slide presentation given by David Archibald in Melbourne on February 5th. The PDF here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/12/david-archibald-on-climate-and-energy-security/)
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:average temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, January temperature, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, North West, Northeast, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Regional temperature, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, State high temperature records, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, US high temperature, USHCN, weather stations, West North Central
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 8 Comments »
23 januari, 2011
I have written extensively on this blog about the tweaking, “adjustment” and manipulation of the historic and present temperature “record” which are presented in the official figures.
With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations around 1990 – roughly 63 % of all climate measuring stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
(See for example my posts:
Rewriting Temperature History – Time and Time Again!,
More on the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data and the mess they have,
The Big dropout of weather stations since 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years,
The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data.
Minus 60 C or not?
The world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data)
Just one example of this historical “adjustment and tweaking” they are doing:
On average 20% of the historical record was modified 16 times 2006 to beginning of 2008. The largest single jump was 0.27 C. This occurred between the Oct 13, 2006 and Jan 15, 2007 records when Aug 2006 changed from an anomaly of +0.43C to +0.70C, a change of nearly 68%.
And what a “coincidence” that the data is always “modified” in only on direction – guess which one.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit there agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
Just a couple of weeks ago a new report was published by Patrick Frank that shows that there has NEVER been a measurement of Sensor measurement uncertainty in ALL the weather stations used for the “Global” temperature “record”. And that “the systematic error from uncontrolled variables has been invariably neglected”.
UNCERTAINTY IN THE GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE AIR TEMPERATURE INDEX: A REPRESENTATIVE LOWER LIMIT
Patrick Frank, Palo Alto, CA 94301-2436, USA, Energy and Environment, Volume 21, Number 8 / December 2010 DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.21.8.969
Abstract here:
http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/q557742n3221/?p=e174cd02151f44d7bd601ebb287be383&pi=0
Abstract :
“Sensor measurement uncertainty has never been fully considered in prior appraisals of global average surface air temperature. The estimated average ±0.2 C station error has been incorrectly assessed as random, and the systematic error from uncontrolled variables has been invariably neglected. The systematic errors in measurements from three ideally sited and maintained temperature sensors are calculated herein. Combined with the ±0.2 C average station error, a representative lower-limit uncertainty of ±0.46 C was found for any global annual surface air temperature anomaly. This ±0.46 C reveals that the global surface air temperature anomaly trend from 1880 through 2000 is statistically indistinguishable from 0 C, and represents a lower limit of calibration uncertainty for climate models and for any prospective physically justifiable proxy reconstruction of paleo-temperature. The rate and magnitude of 20th century warming are thus unknowable, and suggestions of an unprecedented trend in 20th century global air temperature are unsustainable.”
Summary and Conclusion:
“The assumption of global air temperature sensor noise stationarity is empirically untested and unverified. Estimated noise uncertainty propagates as
rather than 
.
Future noise uncertainty in monthly means would greatly diminish if the siting of surface stations is improved and the sensor noise variances become known, monitored, and empirically verified as stationary.
The ±0.46 C lower limit of uncertainty shows that between 1880 and 2000, the trend in averaged global surface air temperature anomalies is statistically indistinguishable from 0 C at the 1σ level. One cannot, therefore, avoid the conclusion that it is presently impossible to quantify the warming trend in global climate since 1880.”
See also the letter to the Editors (APS Physics) by Patrick Frank:
http://www.aps.org/units/nes/newsletters/fall09.cfm
See also
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2011/01/20/what-evidence-for-unprecedented-warming/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/20/surface-temperature-uncertainty-quantified/
So I thought I show you the drastic dropping of weather stations in 1989-1992. Others have shown this before and done a very good job presenting it. But it is worth repeating because most people has no idea on what shaky grounds the temperature records are based.
And remember –This dropping of stations was done on purpose. And you can see on the graph what “happened” to the temperature after that. For some very “odd” reason it went up sharply.
Hmnnn??
Can there be a connection???
And remember – Nearly ALL OF THESE STATIONS ARE STILL THERE AND GENERATING DATA.
In 3 years, from 1989 to 1992, 5218 stations were purposely “dropped”.
From 1993 to 2000 1384 more stations were “dropped”. A total of 6602 stations.
And if we compare with 1970 with1992 8445 stations have been “dropped”.
If we compare 1970 with year 2000 9829 stations have been “dropped”.
This is the ”logic and science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
1970 (15 094 Stations)
1990 (9 475 Stations)
2000 (5 265 Stations)
Where did all the stations in China, India, Asia, Africa, Latin America, Middle East, Russia, Antarctica, and Australia go?????
AND WHY??????
Whole continents “just disappeared” and most of the landmass of Earth is now NOT COVERED.
And how do you compare the “average” Global temperature when they dropped 9829 stations between 1970 and 2000??????
9829 stations that where part of the “average” global temperature????
This is the “science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
And it gets worse (which in itself s an “achievement”). Look at the map for 2010 – EVEN MORE landmass are “gone” on purpose. Including large parts of USA. See the huge contrast between 2000 an 2010 regarding USA.
2010
See also some of my previous post on this subject:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 241
NASA ”systematically eliminated 75% of the world’s stations with a clear bias toward removing higher-latitude, high-altitude and rural locations.
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 211
How “they” (NASA) make Bolivia a VERY HOT PLACE EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO TEMPERATURE STATIONS OR DATA FROM THERE.
Another brilliant example of the trustworthiness of the Global Warming Hysteria.
And “their science”.
“One Small Problem. There has not been any thermometer data in GHCN since 1990.
None. Nada. Zilch. Nothing. Empty Set.
So just how can it be so Hot Hot Hot! in Bolivia if there is NO data?
Easy. GIStemp “makes it up” from “nearby” thermometers up to 1200 km away.
So what is within 1200 km of Bolivia? The beaches of Peru and the Amazon Jungle. Not exactly the same as snow capped peaks, but hey, you gotta make do with what you have, you know? (The official excuse given is that the data acceptance window closes on one day of the month and Bolivia does not report until after that date. Oh, and they never ever would want to go back and add date into the past after a close date. Yet they are happy to fiddle with, adjust, modify, and wholesale change and delete old data as they change their adjustment methods…)”
Here are some more glaring examples of this “tweaking and adjustment” of the temperature “record”:
NEW ENGLAND’S TEMPERATURE HISTORY AND TRENDS (1911 – 2009)
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/ne_temp_history_trends.pdf
WHY NOAA AND NASA PROCLAMATIONS SHOULD BE IGNORED
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/noaa_2010_report.pdf
“NASA/NOAA homogenization process has been shown to significantly alter the trends in many stations where the siting and rural nature suggest the data is reliable. In fact, adjustments account for virtually all the trend in the data. Unadjusted data for the best sites/rural shows cyclical multi-decadal variations but no net long term trend as former NASA scientist Dr. Ed Long showed here. He showed however that after adjustment, the rural data trend was made consistent with the urban data set with an artificial warming introduced.“
See also
http://climateaudit.org/2010/12/26/nasa-giss-adjusting-the-adjustments/
Just look at this “tweaking” done by NASA/NOAA in August 2007 to the temperature “record”. They just “happened” to LOWER the temperature 1880-1900 by OVER 0.3 C and then they just “happened” to RISE the temperature 1990-2007 by OVER 0.2 C. So “suddenly” you have a nice “warming trend” where there were NONE before. In fact it was a lowering trend from year 2000 which “suddenly” change to a warming trend with OVER 0.4 C difference.
This is the “science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
US Agencies Still Fiddling Temperature Record, Reports SPPI
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?storyid=671981&ret=close
NASA and NOAA, which each receive close to half a billion dollars a year in taxpayer funding, have been systematically fiddling the worldwide temperature record for years, making “global warming” look worse than it is, according to a new paper by the Science and Public Policy Institute. The findings are reported by Joe D’Aleo, a leading meteorologist.
Robert Ferguson, President of SPPI, said: “Despite billions spent on official claims about the supposed threat of catastrophic man-made ‘global warming’, opinion polls show the public are no longer fooled. A main reason why the voters buy don’t climate alarmism any more is that the tiny but well-connected, lavishly-funded Climategate clique keeps on being caught out bending the scientific evidence.
The problem of data integrity has recently been commented on by MIT’s Dr. Richard Lindzen, “Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data…That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a certain corruption within the climate science community.”
Mr. D’Aleo’s paper is a damning exposé of the inner workings of two agencies of the US Government –
• The global temperature data from surface stations is “seriously compromised: the data suffer significant contamination by urbanization and other local factors such as changes in land cover and land use”. Numerous peer review papers suggest contamination of 30%, 50% or more.
•The state of the temperature database, in the words of one of its operators, is “hopeless”, with “hundreds if not thousands of pairs of dummy and duplicate stations”.
•The NASA warming is achieved in part by inventing data in arctic areas where no stations exist.
•In the US, the warmest decade of the 20th century was the 1930s, and the warmest year was 1934, NASA’s chief climate scientist announced after the last super El Nino.
•NOAA tampered with temperature data in 2000, 2007 and 2009 to create an artificial increase of 0.3 F° in the warming trend since the 1930s.
•NASA admits even today on their website, there is no generally-accepted standard for surface air temperatures.
•Temperatures for the 1930s to 1950s have been readjusted downward to make the warming since then seem greater than it is.
•Temperatures for recent decades have been readjusted upward to make the warming of the 20th century seem greater than it is.
•Over time in the NASA database, the warming trend has been steadily increasing – not because the weather is getting warmer but because NASA keeps tampering with the data.
•The data tampering became more serious and more frequent in 2007, when a strong la Niña caused widespread and profound global cooling.
•Adjustments by NOAA and NASA, rather than real-world temperature changes, account for virtually all the apparent warming trend in the global data.
•NASA and NOAA have repeatedly resisted Freedom of Information Act requests for release of the unadjusted data and documentation of adjustments made, probably because they fear independent analysis will demonstrate the adjustments are unwarranted and warming insignificant
•Global temperature databases are “seriously flawed” and “can no longer be trusted to assess climate trends or rankings or validate model forecasts”.
In a lengthy paper updated in August 2010, Surface Temperature Records: Policy Driven Deception? , Watts and D’Aleo catalogued numerous case studies of temperature data tampering around the world. This issue is of critical importance because these very data sets are used as justification of advocacy for formulating and implementing unprecedented policy decisions seeking radical transformations of our society and institutions.
Said Ferguson, “So blatantly obvious has the tampering become that Congress must mandate a thorough investigation of the temperature records, independent of the government scientists controlling them. A ‘B’ team of non-government and non-UN experts must be established with access to all the raw data, records, adjustments, fudges, bodges and computer codes currently being black-boxed by government scientists.”
SURFACE TEMPERATURE RECORDS: POLICY-DRIVEN DECEPTION?
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/surface_temp.pdf
SUMMARY FOR POLICY MAKERS
(by SPPI)
1. Instrumental temperature data for the pre-satellite era (1850-1980) have been so widely, systematically, and uni-directionally tampered with that it cannot be credibly asserted there has been any significant “global warming” in the 20th century.
2. All terrestrial surface-temperature databases exhibit signs of urban heat pollution and post measurement adjustments that render them unreliable for determining accurate long-term temperature trends.
3. All of the problems have skewed the data so as greatly to overstate observed warming both regionally and globally.
4. Global terrestrial temperature data are compromised because more than three-quarters of the 6,000 stations that once reported are no longer being used in data trend analyses.
5. There has been a significant increase in the number of missing months with 40% of the GHCN stations reporting at least one missing month. This requires infilling which adds to the uncertainty and possible error.
6. Contamination by urbanization, changes in land use, improper siting, and inadequately-calibrated instrument upgrades further increases uncertainty.
7. Numerous peer-reviewed papers in recent years have shown the overstatement of observed longer term warming is 30-50% from heat-island and land use change contamination.
8. An increase in the percentage of compromised stations with interpolation to vacant data grids may make the warming bias greater than 50% of 20th-century warming.
9. In the oceans, data are missing and uncertainties are substantial. Changes in data sets introduced a step warming in 2009.
10. Satellite temperature monitoring has provided an alternative to terrestrial stations in compiling the global lower-troposphere temperature record. Their findings are increasingly diverging from the station-based constructions in a manner consistent with evidence of a warm bias in the surface temperature record.
11. Additional adjustments are made to the data which result in an increasing apparent trend. In many cases, adjustments do this by cooling off the early record.
12. Changes have been made to alter the historical record to mask cyclical changes that could be readily explained by natural factors like multi-decadal ocean and solar changes.
13. Due to recently increasing frequency of eschewing rural stations and favoring urban airports as the primary temperature data sources, global terrestrial temperature data bases are thus seriously flawed and can no longer be representative of both urban and rural environments. The resulting data is therefore problematic when used to assess climate trends or VALIDATE model forecasts.
14. An inclusive external assessment is essential of the surface temperature record of CRU, GISS and NCDC “chaired and paneled by mutually agreed to climate scientists who do not have a vested interest in the outcome of the evaluations.”
15. Reliance on the global data by both the UNIPCC and the US GCRP/CCSP should trigger a review of these documents assessing the base uncertainty of forecasts and policy language.
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:a political agenda, adjustment, Anthony Watts, Climate Change, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, cooler than the average, coolest December, CRN, December Temperature, Departure from normal, Edward R. Long, Florida, Florida temperature, Georgia, Georgia temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteri, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, Hansen, historical record, homemade statistical method, homogenization, Joe D’Aleo, Journalism, land use change factors, Mainstream media, manipulation, measurement biases, Media, Menne adjustment methodology, Menne-transformed, MSM, NASA, NCDC, New England, News, NOAA, Patrick Frank, poor placement of stations, Press, quality control, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, SPPI, Steve McIntyre, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Traditional Media, Trends per decade, tweaking, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations, World temperature
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 19 Comments »
15 januari, 2011
Temperature dropped nearly 10F below average during December.
Did you see any headlines like this from the “Mainstream media” who otherwise are so eager to spread the Global Warming Hysteria?
NO – And this exactly the point. Because, despite this drastic lowering of temperature, life goes on as normal in Florida and Georgia.
And since this was a drastic lowering of the temperature, and does not fit their agenda, no big headlines except in some of the local media.
Isn’t it interesting that a PREDICTED (by their beloved computer models) rise of temperature of 1.5-2F in the next 100 years is considered a catastrophe for humankind and an eminent treat for our survival?.
By the way, these computer models are the same models THAT CAN NOT PREDICT THE WEATHER A WEEK FROM NOW, OR THE WEATHER A WEEK AGO. But they claim that they can predict the temperature a 100 years from now with 0.1F certainty!
As I have been saying all along, it has always been a political agenda – anti human, anti freedom, anti development and anti capitalism. And this Global Warming Hysteria is part of that agenda. It has nothing to do with science, facts or saving the environment or the Earth.
All of this, as always, paid by us, the common people, in the form of taxes, high energy costs and reducing our living standard back to the Stone Age.
And these guys spends billions and TRILLIONS of $ of our tax money to “fight” this predicted “Global Warming” and to “reduce” our “carbon footprint”. Ramming through their political agenda at all costs.
So lets look what happened in Florida and Georgia in December.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Florida:
This year, the December temperature is – 8.6 F cooler than1931, the warmest December And if we compare this year’s December with 1971 it is – 6.7 F cooler. If we compare with1998 this year’s December is – 14.7 F cooler. And if we compare with 2007 it is -14 F cooler
This December is – 9.3F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2010. And is the coolest December in 116 years.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And somehow a DROP of -9.3F degrees in one month compared to the average is not considered a “big deal”. In fact it is ignored. But a “predicted rise of 1.5-2F over a 100 years is considered by the same Global Warming Hysterics to be a total catastrophe for humankind.
So to recapitulate: a DROP of average temperature of – 0.3F PER DAY is nothing, ignore it. But a “predicted” rise of average temperature of 0.02F PER YEARis a total catastrophe for humankind.
By the way, if you wondered, 0.02F per year is 0.00005F per day.
This is the ”logic and science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
2010 temperature
This year Florida’s temperature is – 3.3 F cooler than1990, the warmest year. And if we compare this year with 1948 it is – 3 F cooler. If we compare with1911 this year is – 2.7 F cooler. And if we compare with 2007 it is – 2.3 F cooler
This year is – 1.33F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2010. And is the 5th coolest year in 116 years.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
Georgia:
This year, the December temperature is – 17.3 F cooler than1931, the warmest December And if we compare this year’s December with 1971 it is -16.5 F cooler. If we compare with1984 this year’s December is – 15.8 F cooler. And if we compare with 2007 it is -13.2 F cooler
This December is – 8.34F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2010. And is the coolest December in 116 years.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
And somehow a DROP of -8.34F degrees in one month compared to the average is not considered a “big deal”. In fact it is ignored. But a “predicted rise of 1.5-2F over a 100 years is considered a total catastrophe for humankind.
So to recapitulate: a DROP of average temperature of – 0.27F PER DAY is nothing, ignore it. But a “predicted” rise of average temperature of 0.02F PER YEAR is a total catastrophe for humankind.
This is the ”logic and science” behind the Global warming Hysteria.
2010 temperature
This year Georgia’s temperature is – 3.4 F cooler than1921, the warmest year. And if we compare this year with 1998 it is – 2.8 F cooler. If we compare with1946 this year is – 2.7 F cooler. And if we compare with 2007 it is – 1.7 F cooler
This year is – 0.91F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2010. And is the 22nd coolest year in 116 years.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:2010 Temperature, a political agenda, anti development, anti freedom, anti human, Climate Change, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, cooler than the average, coolest December, CRN, December Temperature, Departure from normal, Florida, Florida temperature, Georgia, Georgia temperature, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Global Warming Hysteri, Global Warming Hysteria, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, Journalism, land use change factors, Mainstream media, measurement biases, Media, MSM, NASA, NCDC, News, poor placement of stations, Press, quality control, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Traditional Media, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 4 Comments »
14 januari, 2011
Since the official December temperature figures are out we now have the figures for the whole of 2010. I will in later posts look at the continental US figures and compare them with a state/regional analysis.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the December figures see my post:
December Temperature Continental U.S. -5.45 F cooler than the warmest December
For the November figures see my post:
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
For the May figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 366
For the April figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 365
For the March figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 357
For the February figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 347
For the January figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 287
For the December figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 207
Year 2010 temperature
This year the temperature is -1.32F cooler than 1998, the “warmest year” And if we compare this year with 1953 it is – 0.4F cooler. If we compare with1934 this year is – 1.07F cooler. And if we compare with 1921 it is – 0.77F cooler
This Year is 0.86F degrees warmer than the average for 1900-2010.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:2010 Temperature, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 6 Comments »
13 januari, 2011
The official December temperature figures are out. I will in later posts look at the continental US figures for December, and compare them with a state/regional analysis.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius, the historical “adjustment and tweaking” to cool the past etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of all the GHCN world stations.
For the November figures see my post:
November Temperature – Continental U.S. and a Regional Analysis
For the May figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 366
For the April figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 365
For the March figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 357
For the February figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 347
For the January figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 287
For the December figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 207
December 2010 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
December temperature 1900-2010
“The average temperature in December 2010 was 33.0 F. This was – 0.4 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 44th coolest December in 116 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the December temperature is – 5.45 F cooler than1939, the warmest December And if we compare this year’s December with 1957 it is – 4.83 F cooler. If we compare with1923 this year’s December is – 3.8 F cooler. And if we compare with 1886 is – 3.84 F cooler
This December is -0.45F degrees cooler than the average for 1900-2010.
That’s what I call RAPID WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, December Temperature, Departure from normal, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, poor placement of stations, quality control, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 3 Comments »
10 januari, 2011
While we all are “eagerly” awaiting the official December temperature figures I thought it would be interesting to look at the continental US figures for November, and compare them with a regional analysis.
And remember, these are the official figures. With the poor placement of stations (91 % of the stations are CRN 3 to 5 = bad to very poor); where they have purposely taken away the urban heat island effect, use huge smoothing radius etc.
Not to mention the great slaughter of GHCN stations 1990-1993 – roughly 63 % of all stations were “dropped”. Oddly enough many of them in cold places – Hmmm? Now the number of GHCN stations are back at the same numbers as in 1890.
(See for example my posts: Rewriting Temperature History – Time and Time Again!,
More on the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data and the mess they have,
The Big dropout of weather stations since 1989 – A 66% reduction in 11 years,
The Big Difference Between GISS and UAH Temperature Data.
Minus 60 C or not?
The world has never seen such freezing heat OR the Blunder with NASA: s GISS Temperature data)
Just one example of this historical “adjustment and tweaking” they are doing:
On average 20% of the historical record was modified 16 times 2006 to beginning of 2008. The largest single jump was 0.27 C. This occurred between the Oct 13, 2006 and Jan 15, 2007 records when Aug 2006 changed from an anomaly of +0.43C to +0.70C, a change of nearly 68%.
And what a “coincidence” that the data is always “modified” in only on direction – guess which one.
Also remember that the US stations are now nearly a third of the all GHCN world stations.
For the May figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 366
For the April figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 365
For the March figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 357
For the February figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 347
For the January figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 287
For the December figures see my post:
Climate Gate – All the manipulations and lies revealed 207
November 2010 departure from normal temperature
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/cag3.html
November temperature 1900-2010
“The average temperature in November 2010 was 43.3 F. This was 0.8 F warmer than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 46th warmest November in 116 years. The temperature trend for the period of record (1895 to present) is 0.1 degrees Fahrenheit per decade. “
This year, the November temperature is – 5.34 F cooler than1999, the warmest November And if we compare this year’s November with 1949 it is – 2.99 F cooler.
If we compare with1909 this year’s November is – 2.65 F cooler.
That’s what I call WARMING and an eminent treat to humankind!
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/cag3/na.html
I thought it would be interesting to look at the regional picture. Especially if you see the bright red areas in the official “Departure from normal” November picture above. Which covers the WHOLE central, and most of the eastern USA, from north to south.
It looks very dramatic doesn’t it?
If you contrast that with the regional one, remember this is from the same people and the same “official data”; the difference is HUGE to say the least.
Compare this departure from normal with the regional ones for East North Central, Central and South and you get a very different picture to say the least!
Here are the 1900-2010 trends per Decade for these regions:
East North Central 0.09F
Central 0,15F
South 0,00F
Ehhh? Where did these huge red areas of Texas and the rest of the south go???
And East North Central? A “warming trend” of 0,009F degrees a year. With this dangerous, accelerated and rapid warming it will take 111 years and 2 months to “warm“a whole 1F degree.
We are REALLY FACING EXTINCTION ARE WE NOT?
And South with a “warming trend” of exactly 0,000F degrees a year??
Whoa – Take cover! Armageddon is here.
This is the “stuff” that “Global Warming” is made of.
And as I said in the beginning – always remember that these figures are based on the official data that has been tweaked, “adjusted” and manipulated to fit there agenda (cool the past, ignore UHI and land use change factors, huge smoothing radius – 1200km etc.)..
East North Central
Central
South
Here are the rest of the regions (North West, North East, South East, South West, West, West North Central):
North West
West
West North Central
South West
South East
North East
Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om http://bloggar.se/om/milj%F6” rel=”tag”>miljö</a>, <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/yttrandefrihet” rel=”tag”>yttrandefrihet</a>, <a href=”http://bloggar.se/om/fri-+och+r%E4ttigheter” rel=”tag”>fri- och rättigheter, Läs även andra bloggares åsikter om <a href=” http://bloggar.se/om/USA” rel=”tag”>USA</a>
Etiketter:Aug 2006, Central, climate record, Climate Reference Network, climate stations, Continental U.S., cool the past, CRN, Departure from normal, East North Central, GHCN, GISS, Global temperature, Global Temperature Trends, Goddard Institute of Space Flight, historical record, land use change factors, measurement biases, NASA, NCDC, North East, North West, November Temperature, poor placement of stations, quality control, Regional Analysis, regional climate change, Site Information Handbook, smoothing radius, South, South East, South West, Surface stations, Temperaturdata, Temperature data, temperature measurement, Texas, the National Climatic Data Center, thermometers, Trends per decade, U.S.Temperature, UAH, UHI, Urban Heat Island, USHCN, weather stations, West, West North Central
Publicerat i Fri- och rättigheter, Miljö - Environment, US Temperature, USA, Yttrandefrihet | 7 Comments »
UD/RK Samhälls Debatt 